03.10.2014 Views

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL<br />

18 SEPTEMBER 2012<br />

Financial Implications<br />

Should Council resolve to refuse the revised proposal, the matter may proceed to a full<br />

hearing at the SAT. Costs for the hearing may range from $10,000 to $15,000.<br />

Strategic Implications<br />

Goal 2:<br />

Objective 2.1:<br />

SI 2.1.5:<br />

To plan, develop, enhance and maintain a quality built and natural<br />

environment based on sustainability principles.<br />

Position the <strong>City</strong> as a flagship <strong>of</strong> sustainable urban local government,<br />

encouraging innovative, creative and inspirational built form and<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Develop and implement policies to support and promote sustainable<br />

building design.<br />

Sustainability Implications<br />

The following tables outline the applicable sustainability issues for this proposal:-<br />

Nil.<br />

Issue<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

Comment<br />

Nil.<br />

Issue<br />

SOCIAL<br />

Comment<br />

Issue<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> key business sectors<br />

ECONOMIC<br />

Comment<br />

The subject proposal will not result in land use<br />

patterns developing in line with the <strong>City</strong>’s current<br />

Scheme and Policy objectives.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The proposed development application directly contravenes the objectives <strong>of</strong> the Mixed<br />

Business Zone as set out under LPS3, and directly contravenes the land use controls as set<br />

out within the Mixed Business Design Guidelines. The applicant’s submission and<br />

justification in support <strong>of</strong> the subject proposal such as land use patterns established under a<br />

previous zoning and previous planning scheme, commercial leasing prospects and<br />

precedent do not have any statutory planning basis or merit by which the <strong>City</strong> may consider<br />

approving the application. For the above reasons the application is recommended for<br />

refusal.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!