03.10.2014 Views

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL<br />

18 SEPTEMBER 2012<br />

The requirement for the reinstatement <strong>of</strong> a car parking contingency arrangement is<br />

inconsistent with previous decisions taken by Council and is not reflective <strong>of</strong> the factual<br />

car parking situation occurring in the locality as documented in the parking assessment<br />

report prepared by Uloth and Associates.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In conclusion, the proposed Dan Murphy’s development is considered to be an<br />

appropriate use for the site. Conditions 1, 2 and 3 relating to a parking contingencies<br />

are considered unnecessary on the basis that:-<br />

Current and previous parking assessments have demonstrated that the level <strong>of</strong><br />

proposed parking will be in excess <strong>of</strong> current and future requirements.<br />

The <strong>City</strong>’s technical <strong>of</strong>ficers through a detailed assessment concur that the<br />

proposed level <strong>of</strong> on site parking provision is adequate to meet projected need.<br />

No complaints have been received to date regarding parking provision at the<br />

Mirrabooka Square Shopping Centre.<br />

A former parking contingency plan similar to that proposed by the planning<br />

approval conditions was extinguished by Council in 2010 on the basis that<br />

parking at the Regional Centre was underutilised.<br />

Consideration <strong>of</strong> parking provision associated with any particular development<br />

should be considered on its merits at that time.<br />

Given the above, we respectfully request that Council amend the planning approval<br />

and delete conditions 1, 2 and 3 as soon as possible. This will ensure that a time<br />

consuming and costly application for review to the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT)<br />

will not be required in order for the unnecessary conditions to be removed."<br />

The Applicant provided the following additional justification following the Mediation<br />

Conference convened on 21 September 2012:-<br />

“ There is no nexus between car parking contingency conditions 1, 2 and 3 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planning approval and the considerations and requirements as set out within the<br />

Respondent's planning framework, inclusive <strong>of</strong> the applicable local planning<br />

scheme and relevant planning policies.<br />

The matter has now been considered by the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT)<br />

and the SAT has determined that conditions 1, 2 and 3 <strong>of</strong> the planning approval<br />

be sent back under Section 31 <strong>of</strong> the State Administrative Tribunal Act, 2004 for<br />

serious reconsideration by the Respondent.<br />

All car parking associated with the Mirrabooka Square Shopping Centre,<br />

including the proposed Dan Murphy's Liquor Store will be a shared (reciprocal)<br />

resource. Based on the application <strong>of</strong> accepted planning principles, shared use<br />

will result in a reduction <strong>of</strong> overall parking demand. This will occur due to<br />

different businesses having differing peak periods <strong>of</strong> operation that do not<br />

overlap, and also due to patrons visiting multiple tenancies as part <strong>of</strong> one trip to<br />

the centre.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!