03.10.2014 Views

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL<br />

18 SEPTEMBER 2012<br />

Conservation Parameter No. 7: Any original ceiling treatments should be retained and<br />

restored. As with flooring, original pressed tin should be salvaged from the demolition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

remaining building and reused in the conservation works, where the original ceiling is no<br />

longer extant.<br />

Applicants Comment<br />

The applicant has advised that the<br />

prospective tenant do not wish to re-use any<br />

<strong>of</strong> the existing ceilings within their tenancy<br />

and therefore, has proposed two<br />

alternatives:-<br />

Re-use an element <strong>of</strong> the original<br />

pressed tin ceiling within the entry<br />

lobby to the upper level <strong>of</strong>fice and/or<br />

residential uses, as a means to<br />

interpret the building's history; or<br />

Leave the ceiling in-situ but cover it<br />

with a suspended ceiling to meet<br />

tenant requirements, whilst<br />

preserving the original ceiling for<br />

resurrection at a later date.<br />

<strong>City</strong>’s Heritage Consultant Comment<br />

The latter alternative is the preferred<br />

solution, as it will enable the ceiling to be<br />

reinstated at a later date. During the works it<br />

is recommended that the Applicant take<br />

photographs documenting the nature and<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> existing pressed tin ceiling.<br />

In relation to the suggestion to reinstate a<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> weatherboard to the Second<br />

Avenue façade, the applicant has advised<br />

that they will consider this request, but<br />

cannot make any commitment with respect<br />

to retaining this element <strong>of</strong> the building's<br />

fabric.<br />

Policy and Legislative Implications<br />

The owner/applicant has exercised their right to have the decision reviewed in accordance<br />

with Part 14 <strong>of</strong> the Planning and Development Act 2005. The <strong>City</strong> is required to attend a<br />

further directions hearing at the SAT on 5 October 2012.<br />

Financial Implications<br />

Should Council resolve to refuse the revised proposal, the matter may proceed to a full<br />

hearing at the SAT. Costs for the hearing may range from $10,000 to $15,000.<br />

Strategic Implications<br />

Goal 2:<br />

Objective 2.1:<br />

SI 2.1.6:<br />

To plan, develop, enhance and maintain a quality built and natural<br />

environment based on sustainability principles.<br />

Position the <strong>City</strong> as a flagship <strong>of</strong> sustainable urban local government,<br />

encouraging innovative, creative and inspirational built form and<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Develop and implement policies to improve the identification, retention and<br />

restoration <strong>of</strong> heritage buildings, streetscapes and areas.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!