03.10.2014 Views

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL<br />

18 SEPTEMBER 2012<br />

9. A report from a Structural Engineer shall be submitted to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> Manager<br />

Approvals prior to the issue <strong>of</strong> a demolition licence, demonstrating that any<br />

modification to the internal floor levels to create one (1) finished level across the<br />

tenancy (without internal steps) will not have an adverse impact on the structural<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> the building.<br />

10. An Archival Record <strong>of</strong> the building shall be undertaken to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Manager Approvals prior to the issue <strong>of</strong> a demolition licence. Additional images <strong>of</strong> the<br />

building should be undertaken during the demolition works to document the nature and<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> the pressed tin ceiling.<br />

Officer's Recommendation<br />

That pursuant to the Orders made by the Tribunal in accordance with Section 31 <strong>of</strong> the State<br />

Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA), the Council RECONSIDERS its decision and that<br />

pursuant to Clause 10.3.1 <strong>of</strong> Local Planning Scheme No.3, the application for partial<br />

demolition <strong>of</strong> the commercial building at Lot 25, House Number 760, Beaufort Street, Mount<br />

Lawley be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-<br />

1. The extent <strong>of</strong> fabric retained shall be no less than that which encompasses the original<br />

corner store, and one (1) structural bay back from the Beaufort Street frontage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

three (3) shops facing Beaufort Street, subject to:-<br />

a. Certification from a suitably qualified Structural Engineer being provided to the<br />

satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Manager Approvals, which demonstrates how the structural<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> the remaining original structure will be maintained.<br />

2. The internal wall between ‘Shop 2’ and ‘Shop 3’ may be removed subject to:-<br />

a. Certification from a suitably qualified Structural Engineer being provided to the<br />

satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Manager Approvals, which demonstrates that the removal <strong>of</strong><br />

this portion <strong>of</strong> wall will not have an adverse impact on the structural stability <strong>of</strong><br />

the remaining original structure;<br />

b. The parapet ties above the wall being retained in situ; and<br />

c. The removal <strong>of</strong> the internal wall does not extend any closer to the front wall than<br />

the depth <strong>of</strong> shop entry return wall so that the original door opening can be<br />

reconstructed.<br />

3. The existing non-original awning shall be removed and a verandah be reinstated<br />

based on photographic evidence (with non-structural posts), to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Manager Approvals.<br />

4. Original door and window openings to the Beaufort Street façade are to be reinstated<br />

to reflect the original configuration <strong>of</strong> openings based on photographic evidence, to the<br />

satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Manager Approvals. It is not necessary that the doors to Beaufort<br />

Street are operable. Further investigation, both archival and <strong>of</strong> the existing fabric, is be<br />

undertaken to ascertain whether the doors were recessed. If it is found that the doors<br />

were originally recessed (as is common in the area), they should be reinstated as<br />

such.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!