03.10.2014 Views

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL<br />

18 SEPTEMBER 2012<br />

Council Resolution<br />

0912/027<br />

Moved Councillor Italiano, seconded Councillor Michael<br />

That pursuant to the Orders made by the Tribunal in accordance with Section 31 <strong>of</strong><br />

the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA), the Council RECONSIDERS its<br />

decision and that pursuant to Clause 10.3.1 <strong>of</strong> Local Planning Scheme No.3, the<br />

application for partial demolition <strong>of</strong> the commercial building at Lot 25, House Number<br />

760, Beaufort Street, Mount Lawley be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-<br />

1. The extent <strong>of</strong> fabric retained shall be no less than that which encompasses the<br />

original corner store, and one (1) structural bay back from the Beaufort Street<br />

frontage <strong>of</strong> the three (3) shops facing Beaufort Street, subject to:-<br />

a. Certification from a suitably qualified Structural Engineer being provided to<br />

the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Manager Approvals, which demonstrates how the<br />

structural stability <strong>of</strong> the remaining original structure will be maintained.<br />

2. The internal wall between ‘Shop 2’ and ‘Shop 3’ may be removed subject to:-<br />

a. Certification from a suitably qualified Structural Engineer being provided to<br />

the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Manager Approvals, which demonstrates that the<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> this portion <strong>of</strong> wall will not have an adverse impact on the<br />

structural stability <strong>of</strong> the remaining original structure;<br />

b. The parapet ties above the wall being retained in situ; and<br />

c. The removal <strong>of</strong> the internal wall does not extend any closer to the front wall<br />

than the depth <strong>of</strong> shop entry return wall so that the original door opening<br />

can be reconstructed.<br />

3. The existing non-original awning shall be removed and a verandah be reinstated<br />

based on photographic evidence (with non-structural posts), to the satisfaction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Manager Approvals.<br />

4. Original door and window openings to the Beaufort Street façade are to be<br />

reinstated to reflect the original configuration <strong>of</strong> openings based on<br />

photographic evidence, to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Manager Approvals. It is not<br />

necessary that the doors to Beaufort Street are operable. Further investigation,<br />

both archival and <strong>of</strong> the existing fabric, is be undertaken to ascertain whether<br />

the doors were recessed. If it is found that the doors were originally recessed<br />

(as is common in the area), they should be reinstated as such.<br />

5. A door is to be provided in the corner truncation to reflect the original design <strong>of</strong><br />

the shop, to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Manager Approvals. The existing (nonoriginal)<br />

entrance doors on Second Avenue may be retained if they reflect the<br />

original configuration identified in the photographic evidence.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!