minutes - City of Stirling

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL
18 SEPTEMBER 2012
Quasi-Judicial
Information
Purposes
when Council determines an application/matter that directly affects a
person’s right and interests. The judicial character arises from the
obligation to abide by the principles of natural justice. Examples of
Quasi-Judicial authority include town planning applications, building
licences, applications for other permits/licences (eg under Health
Act, Dog Act or Local Laws) and other decisions that may be
appealable to the State Administrative Tribunal.
includes items provided to Council for information purposes only,
that do not require a decision of Council (i.e. - for 'noting').
Council Resolution
0912/035
Moved Councillor Italiano, seconded Councillor Proud
1. That pursuant to Clause 8.4 of the City’s Local Planning Scheme No.3, the
retrospective application for a Change of Use from ‘Office’ to ‘Educational
Establishment’ (Training Services Australia) at Lot 116, Units 2, 3 and 4, House
Number 799, Beaufort Street, Inglewood, be APPROVED subject to the following
conditions:-
a. Vehicular parking, manoeuvring and circulation areas indicated on
approved plan being sealed, marked and drained to the satisfaction of the
City;
b. All off street parking to be available on site during business hours for all
customers and staff, to the satisfaction of the City;
c. No goods or materials being stored, either temporarily or permanently, in
the parking or landscape areas or within access driveways. All goods and
materials are to be stored within the buildings or storage yards, where
provided; and
d. Any on site floodlights not being positioned or operated in such a manner
so as to cause annoyance to surrounding residents, passing traffic or
nearby businesses.
2. That pursuant to clause 5.8 of the City’s Local Planning Scheme No.3, the cashin-lieu
contribution in relation to the six (6) car bay shortfall be WAIVED for the
application at Lot 116, Units 2, 3 and 4, House Number 799, Beaufort Street,
Inglewood.
3. That the applicant BE ADVISED that the development is to comply in all respects
with the Building Code of Australia and relevant Australian Standards in respect
of access and facilities for the disabled.
The motion was put and declared CARRIED (13/0) by exception resolution (page 184
refers).
For: Councillors Boothman, Cooke, Ferrante, Italiano, Jenkinson, Lagan, Michael, Proud,
Robbins, Sargent, Stewart, Tyzack and Willox.
Against: Nil.
185