03.10.2014 Views

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL<br />

18 SEPTEMBER 2012<br />

In discussing potential uses for the Centre, one (1) option put forward was a Tourist Visitor<br />

Centre and it was further suggested that funding may be available through Tourism Western<br />

Australia for that purpose. It has since been confirmed that Tourism Western Australia does<br />

not provide funding for the establishment or operation <strong>of</strong> Tourist Visitor Centres.<br />

Since the adoption <strong>of</strong> the revised Master Plan several private sector parties have expressed<br />

interest in becoming involved in the redevelopment <strong>of</strong> Scarborough, in particular interest has<br />

been shown in the proposed commercial developments along The Esplanade and above the<br />

Scarboro Surf Life Saving Club. This type <strong>of</strong> development along with redevelopment <strong>of</strong><br />

existing land holdings would create a new look and feel to Scarborough. Refurbishment <strong>of</strong><br />

the existing Maureen Grierson Centre would not contribute positively to the overall Master<br />

Plan for the area. Interested parties have considered the possible refurbishment but<br />

discounted this due to the high cost and limited life <strong>of</strong> such a project given the intent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Master Plan to demolish the building.<br />

The outcome proposed in the Master Plan is to demolish the building and provide<br />

opportunities to develop three commercial activities. These would most likely be hospitality<br />

based (café, restaurant or small bars) or retail activities and would act as additional nonbeach<br />

attractions to Scarborough. This would therefore support the intent <strong>of</strong> the Notice <strong>of</strong><br />

Motion to increase activity and vitality in the precinct however, the proposal to refurbish the<br />

centre is not in line with the Master Plan. Refurbishment would not create this increased<br />

activity or vitality to the extent that the proposal contained within the Master Plan would. A<br />

more effective option would be to progress an application to the Minister for Lands for power<br />

to lease the site as per the adopted Master Plan.<br />

Consultation/Communication Implications<br />

The proposal to refurbish the Maureen Grierson Centre is not in line with the revised Master<br />

Plan adopted by Council in August 2011. The revised Master Plan was developed with<br />

significant input and support from the public. A refurbishment <strong>of</strong> the existing building was not<br />

supported through community consultation and the community was advised in public forums<br />

and through the Master Plan itself that the building would be demolished.<br />

Following Council adoption <strong>of</strong> the Master Plan the document was submitted to the Western<br />

Australian Planning Commission seeking endorsement <strong>of</strong> the overall plan which includes the<br />

proposed development <strong>of</strong> commercial opportunities on the current Maureen Grierson Centre<br />

site. This requires State Government support and approval as the subject land is Crown<br />

land. The outcomes <strong>of</strong> this process are expected in May 2012 and a positive endorsement<br />

would facilitate an approach by the <strong>City</strong> to Minister for Lands for power to lease.<br />

Policy and Legislative Implications<br />

The <strong>City</strong> does not have power to lease the existing Maureen Grierson Centre but could apply<br />

to the Minister for Lands to obtain such power.<br />

Financial Implications<br />

The financial implications <strong>of</strong> refurbishing the existing Maureen Grierson Centre would be<br />

significant as would be the cost <strong>of</strong> operating any attraction or multiple attractions established<br />

in the refurbished building. Any expenditure on refurbishment and establishment <strong>of</strong> an<br />

attraction or attractions would have a limited life cycle given that it would contradict the<br />

adopted Master Plan and could be viewed as wasteful. It is unlikely that any external<br />

funding could be generated for operational or capital purposes which would require the total<br />

cost to be met by the <strong>City</strong>.<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!