Travel in London Travel in London

More documents

Recommendations

Info

10. The London 2012 Games and their legacy – an update number of households increased by 8.9 per cent to 626,600. Growth in these boroughs has been greater than the London average, where there was a 5.6 per cent increase in population and a 4.8 per cent increase in the number of households between 2011 and 2015. Demographically, the six boroughs are far from homogenous, with distinct differences between them in terms of population density, age profiles and ethnic make-up. This is, of course, not surprising given the geographical extent of the Growth Boroughs. Population density has increased in all of the boroughs between 2011 and 2015. Tower Hamlets has shown the largest increase over this period with population density increasing by 13.0 per cent, more than double that of the London average. The percentage of the resident population born abroad varies across the Growth Boroughs. Newham has the highest percentage, at almost 52 per cent. Barking & Dagenham and Tower Hamlets have shown the greatest increase in the percentage of resident population born abroad between 2011 and 2015, at 28 per cent and 22 per cent respectively. In contrast, Greenwich and Waltham Forest have seen a decline in the proportion of the population born abroad over the period, of 7 per cent and 3 per cent respectively. Basic economic indicators Table 10.2 shows some basic indicators relating to jobs and employment. In contrast to the demographic indicators above it is clear from these data that the Growth Boroughs as a group currently under-perform other London comparators. The number of jobs by workplace and gross annual pay of residents has increased in all of the Growth Boroughs between the comparison years. The change in employment rate between 2012 and 2014 is more varied, with the largest increases in Hackney and Tower Hamlets. Greenwich and Waltham Forest have seen a slight decline in the employment rate, by 4 per cent and 1 per cent respectively, and Newham has seen no change. All of the Growth Boroughs have a 2014 employment rate that is lower than the Greater London average. The number of active businesses has increased in all of the Growth Boroughs between 2012 and 2013, and at a faster rate than the London average. The number of active businesses increased by between 9 and 10 per cent in all of the Growth Boroughs, compared to a London average of 6 per cent. 190 Travel in London, Report 8
10. The London 2012 Games and their legacy – an update Table 10.2 Basic economic indicators (employment). Olympic Growth Boroughs and appropriate comparators. Borough/area Number of jobs by workplace Residents gross annual pay (£) Employment rate (%) Number of active enterprises 2012 2013 2012 2014 2012 2014 2012 2013 Barking & Dagenham 53,000 54,300 24,000 27,252 62.3 63.6 4,580 5,055 Greenwich 81,000 83,400 26,000 30,800 69.6 66.7 7,665 8,320 Hackney 112,000 123,300 27,000 32,269 63.7 68.2 12,980 14,180 Newham 89,000 100,300 20,000 25,815 60.5 60.5 7,750 8,540 Tower Hamlets 251,000 269,600 29,000 35,276 61.6 68.7 13,740 15,030 Waltham Forest 72,000 81,100 25,000 27,893 68.2 67.8 8,265 8,970 Inner London 3,033,000 3,263,300 30,000 34,365 67.2 70.8 230,730 245,615 Outer London 1,990,000 2,098,800 27,000 31,906 70.1 71.5 208,675 220,520 Greater London 5,023,000 5,362,600 28,000 32,781 68.9 71.2 439,405 466,135 Source: GLA London Datastore, Borough Profiles: http://data.london.gov.uk/datastore/package/london-borough-profiles . Especially notable are the indices of multiple deprivation, which were recently updated in September 2015. All of the Growth Boroughs have seen an improvement in terms of their average deprivation score ranking – particularly notable is that Hackney and Newham have moved out of top ten most deprived local authorities in England since 2010. It is useful to look at the actual deprivation scores for the Growth Boroughs to see how the level of deprivation has changed between 2010 and 2015 rather than a measure of relativity. All of the Growth Boroughs show a reduction in deprivation except Barking & Dagenham, which has seen a marginal increase. Newham has seen the largest decrease (21 per cent) in deprivation over the 5 year period, closely followed by Greenwich, with a 20 per cent decrease (table 10.3). Table 10.3 English indices of deprivation. Olympic Growth Boroughs. Indices of multiple deprivation Indices of multiple deprivation Rank of average score Average score Borough/area 2010 2015 2010 2015 % change Barking & Dagenham 22 12 34.2 34.6 1% Greenwich 28 78 31.9 25.5 -20% Hackney 2 11 42.9 35.3 -18% Newham 3 23 41.8 32.9 -21% Tower Hamlets 7 10 39.6 35.7 -10% Waltham Forest 15 35 35.4 30.2 -15% Source: Department for Communities and Local Government, Indices of Multiple Deprivation: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/english-indices-of-deprivation Environment, education, crime/safety and active travel National-level data, available through the London Datastore, provide indices relating to many of the social objectives of convergence. Table 10.4 shows a 191 Travel in London, Report 8
Page 1:
Travel in London Travel in London R
Page 5 and 6:
Overview ..........................
Page 7 and 8:
8.1 Introduction and content ......
Page 9 and 10:
5 Travel in London, Report 8
Page 11 and 12:
Overview Overview Travel in London
Page 13 and 14:
Overview of 67.1 per cent in journe
Page 15 and 16:
Overview upgrade programme, includi
Page 17 and 18:
Overview the impact of temporary di
Page 19 and 20:
Overview ‘fair’; perception of
Page 21 and 22:
Overview • The overall distance t
Page 23 and 24:
Overview • Within the overall con
Page 25 and 26:
1. Introduction and contents 1. Int
Page 27 and 28:
1. Introduction and contents 1.3 Mo
Page 29 and 30:
Travel demand and performance of th
Page 31 and 32:
2. Overall travel trends in London
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
3. Travel trends by mode 3. Travel
Page 55 and 56:
3. Travel trends by mode • Passen
Page 57 and 58:
3. Travel trends by mode 10.6 per c
Page 59 and 60:
3. Travel trends by mode Figure 3.5
Page 61 and 62:
3. Travel trends by mode Table 3.1
Page 63 and 64:
3. Travel trends by mode Table 3.2
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
3. Travel trends by mode Light good
Page 73 and 74:
3. Travel trends by mode and partly
Page 75 and 76:
3. Travel trends by mode Although U
Page 77 and 78:
4. Performance of the transport net
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Progress towards MTS transport goal
Page 101 and 102:
5. Operational efficiency, public t
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
6. Safety and security on the trans
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
7. The Customer Experience 7. The c
Page 127 and 128:
7. The Customer Experience • That
Page 129 and 130:
7. The Customer Experience Figure 7
Page 131 and 132:
7. The Customer Experience • Pers
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
7. The Customer Experience markings
Page 139 and 140:
7. The Customer Experience proporti
Page 141 and 142:
7. The Customer Experience of the w
Page 143 and 144: 8. Transport connectivity, physical
Page 167 and 168: 9. London’s air quality and green
Page 189 and 190: 10. The London 2012 Games and their
Page 193: 10. The London 2012 Games and their
Page 207 and 208: Spotlight topics 203 Travel in Lond
Page 209 and 210: 11. Spotlight: How has travel by Lo
Page 245 and 246:
11. Spotlight: How has travel by Lo
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
12. Spotlight: The transport challe
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277:
show all

Travel in London Travel in London

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?