Travel in London Travel in London
travel-in-london-report-8
travel-in-london-report-8
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
11. Spotlight: How has travel by <strong>London</strong>ers changed – <strong>in</strong>sights from 10 years of the <strong>London</strong> <strong>Travel</strong><br />
Demand Survey (LTDS)<br />
Figure 11.12<br />
70<br />
Proportions of <strong>in</strong>ner and outer <strong>London</strong> households with no access to a car.<br />
60<br />
Percentage of households with no car<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15<br />
Greater <strong>London</strong> Inner <strong>London</strong> Outer <strong>London</strong><br />
Source: TfL Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Strategic Analysis.<br />
Density and dependence on motorised transport<br />
The differences <strong>in</strong> density levels and changes <strong>in</strong> density also affect travel behaviour.<br />
As noted elsewhere <strong>in</strong> this chapter, <strong>in</strong>ner and outer <strong>London</strong> have both seen modal<br />
shift away from private car travel, but <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>London</strong>’s case this has largely moved<br />
to walk<strong>in</strong>g and cycl<strong>in</strong>g trips whereas <strong>in</strong> outer <strong>London</strong> public transport ga<strong>in</strong>ed most.<br />
This can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>London</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g density allow<strong>in</strong>g residents to<br />
be less dependent on motorised transport, while the relatively low density of outer<br />
<strong>London</strong> means residents rema<strong>in</strong> dependent on motorised transport whether that is<br />
private car or public transport.<br />
This dependence on motorised transport <strong>in</strong> outer <strong>London</strong> can be l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />
differences <strong>in</strong> the trends <strong>in</strong> trip rates among <strong>in</strong>ner and outer <strong>London</strong> residents that<br />
have been observed over the last 10 years. Although there have been some<br />
fluctuations, <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>London</strong>ers’ trip rates by all modes have been reasonably<br />
constant at around 2.5 trips per person per day. In contrast, outer <strong>London</strong>ers’ trip<br />
rates have been on a decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g trend, with decreases seen most years <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
large decrease of around 10 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2008/09 as the recession hit.<br />
With <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g density mak<strong>in</strong>g car use less appeal<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>London</strong> this has<br />
meant modal shift to public transport walk<strong>in</strong>g and cycl<strong>in</strong>g, whereas <strong>in</strong> outer <strong>London</strong><br />
there has been a net loss <strong>in</strong> the number of trips made per capita.<br />
<strong>Travel</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>London</strong>, Report 8 217