16.12.2015 Views

Travel in London Travel in London

travel-in-london-report-8

travel-in-london-report-8

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11. Spotlight: How has travel by <strong>London</strong>ers changed – <strong>in</strong>sights from 10 years of the <strong>London</strong> <strong>Travel</strong><br />

Demand Survey (LTDS)<br />

Figure 11.12<br />

70<br />

Proportions of <strong>in</strong>ner and outer <strong>London</strong> households with no access to a car.<br />

60<br />

Percentage of households with no car<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15<br />

Greater <strong>London</strong> Inner <strong>London</strong> Outer <strong>London</strong><br />

Source: TfL Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Strategic Analysis.<br />

Density and dependence on motorised transport<br />

The differences <strong>in</strong> density levels and changes <strong>in</strong> density also affect travel behaviour.<br />

As noted elsewhere <strong>in</strong> this chapter, <strong>in</strong>ner and outer <strong>London</strong> have both seen modal<br />

shift away from private car travel, but <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>London</strong>’s case this has largely moved<br />

to walk<strong>in</strong>g and cycl<strong>in</strong>g trips whereas <strong>in</strong> outer <strong>London</strong> public transport ga<strong>in</strong>ed most.<br />

This can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>London</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g density allow<strong>in</strong>g residents to<br />

be less dependent on motorised transport, while the relatively low density of outer<br />

<strong>London</strong> means residents rema<strong>in</strong> dependent on motorised transport whether that is<br />

private car or public transport.<br />

This dependence on motorised transport <strong>in</strong> outer <strong>London</strong> can be l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> the trends <strong>in</strong> trip rates among <strong>in</strong>ner and outer <strong>London</strong> residents that<br />

have been observed over the last 10 years. Although there have been some<br />

fluctuations, <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>London</strong>ers’ trip rates by all modes have been reasonably<br />

constant at around 2.5 trips per person per day. In contrast, outer <strong>London</strong>ers’ trip<br />

rates have been on a decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g trend, with decreases seen most years <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

large decrease of around 10 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2008/09 as the recession hit.<br />

With <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g density mak<strong>in</strong>g car use less appeal<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>London</strong> this has<br />

meant modal shift to public transport walk<strong>in</strong>g and cycl<strong>in</strong>g, whereas <strong>in</strong> outer <strong>London</strong><br />

there has been a net loss <strong>in</strong> the number of trips made per capita.<br />

<strong>Travel</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>London</strong>, Report 8 217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!