Preproceedings 2006 - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

valorise that aspect, arguing erroneously that the
understanding of a rule implies only one answer for new
future cases, he interprets with scepticism the fact that the
rule may be invalidated.
The problem of the paradox does not then consist in
determining the validity of a past application, but in
establishing a criterion that will allow us to decide on which
of the contending applications of the rule is normal. And
this criterion is the forms of life, the solution to the problem
of application of a rule in this case, or in this point.
Normativity, Experience and Concrete Case - Regina Queiroz
References
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 1985 Wittgenstein: Rules,
Grammar and Necessity, in: An Analytical Commentary on
Philosophical Investigations, vol. 2, Oxford: Blackwell.
Kripke, Samuel 1982 Wittgenstein: On Rules and Private
Language, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1977 Philosophical Investigations, trans.
G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford: Blackwell.
271