13.02.2013 Views

Preproceedings 2006 - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

Preproceedings 2006 - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

Preproceedings 2006 - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Rational Structure of Non-Violent Worldview<br />

Antonino Drago, University of Florence and University of Pisa, Italy<br />

1. A premise<br />

Was the 1989 event of the non-violent liberation of so<br />

many Eastern countries an explosion of irrationality? Most<br />

people think so, since rationality in national defence has<br />

also been equated with a great capability for destruction,<br />

obtained by applying scientific research, that is, the<br />

collective reason of mankind applied to human needs. To<br />

want to face a conflict without weapons was considered as<br />

a merely wishful attitude.<br />

Yet the in 20 th cntury, Indian people, subjugated by<br />

the greatest colonialist empire, conquered national<br />

independence without weapons. Their leader, Gandhi, was<br />

inspired by a notion, non-violence, which rejects all<br />

offensive means. Moreover, Gandhi often reiterated that<br />

his non-violent method had to be qualified as a very<br />

science, so that his life experimented with it in a scientific<br />

way (e.g., see the title of 30). On the other hand, Gandhi<br />

accused Western science of being one of the structural<br />

violences exported by Western civilisation.(29) Apparently,<br />

by the term “science” Gandhi was referring to the hard<br />

sciences, yet by interpreting them from an alternative<br />

viewpoint. Which one?<br />

2. An alternative tradition within Western<br />

science<br />

An close look at the history of scientific theories proves<br />

that since the 18 th century natural science has included a<br />

relevant minoritarian tradition. It is not difficult to recognise<br />

that classical chemistry was at variance with Newton’s<br />

mechanics, the dominating theory throughout two<br />

centuries of science. The same holds true for: (12) L.<br />

Carnot’s calculus(6), geometry(5) and mechanics(4), S.<br />

Carnot’s thermodynamics(7), Lobachevsky’s non-<br />

Euclidean geometry(37), Einstein's theory of special<br />

relativity(26).<br />

The alternative attitude of so many theories is<br />

commonly ignored since they are all accused of being<br />

"phenomenological", “immature”, lacking advanced<br />

mathematics theories. Yet, a comparison shows that they<br />

enjoy a common method, which was sketched by L. Carnot<br />

as an improvement of the “synthetic method”. 1<br />

3. The parallelism with conflict theories<br />

Its basic features are shared by some social theories and<br />

even Gandhi’s non-violent thinking.<br />

i) According to L. Carnot's synthetic method, each of<br />

the above-mentioned theories, rather thanbeing organised<br />

as an apodictic system (whose truth flows from few, abstract<br />

axioms by means of a purely deductive development), first<br />

posits an universal problem concerning a given field of<br />

phenomena; e.g., in classical chemistry, to discover which<br />

elements constitute matter; in S. Carnot’s thermodynamics,<br />

the maximum efficiency in producing work from heat; in<br />

Lobachevsky’s theory, whether more than one parallel line is<br />

1 "Note" (6, 217-253). An authoritative book on his scientific activity is (32). A<br />

more recent and complete book is (8).<br />

possible in geometry; in Einstein's theory, which are the<br />

Lorentz invariants in mechanics(13,7, 37,9, 26).<br />

Likely, Gandhi’s worldview cannot be derived from<br />

self-evident principles; rather it puts the universal problem as<br />

to how to solve conflicts in interpersonal relationships by<br />

means of a final agreement among opponents.<br />

Let us note that a scientific theory of even the most<br />

intimate conflicts, i.e., Freud’s psychoanalysis, shares this<br />

feature: it places the problem of solving traumas in a<br />

patient.(27) Also Marx' theory of social conflicts places the<br />

problem of how to overcome capitalism in mankind's<br />

history.(31)<br />

Some theories mediate between natural sciences and<br />

the theory of conflicts; strategic theories apply rationality in a<br />

scientific way to a lot of factors involved in the most<br />

tremendous conflict – war. Rather than merely use brute,<br />

destructive force, some strategiespose the universal<br />

problem of managing wars by linking the best destructive<br />

power with political aims. This attitude characterises the<br />

three strategists Sun Tzu,(41) L. Carnot,(8) Clausewitz.(10)<br />

ii) Each of the above theories induces from commonly<br />

shared knowledge a new method, capable of solving the<br />

previously stated universal problem. Such a feature is<br />

apparent in classical chemistry, where chemists, although<br />

lacking direct evidence on elements of matter, induced, from<br />

both analysis and synthesis of common substances, an<br />

excellent method for listing these elements. Similar notes<br />

apply to the remaining above-mentioned natural theories. In<br />

particular, Einstein's theory started his celebrated paper by<br />

suggesting a new method for measuring space and time, for<br />

obtaining a first Lorentz invariant.(26)<br />

Likely, Gandhi’s theory of non-violence leads us to<br />

induce from the knowledge of the common links with an<br />

opponent a conciliatory viewpoint, from which to develop a<br />

specific method for solving through a common agreement<br />

the conflict.<br />

Notice that both Freud and Marx did not appeal to<br />

esoteric or highly abstract notions from which to draw their<br />

theories; rather, both wrote books addressed to a wide<br />

public for presenting new methods.<br />

Just because the above-mentioned alternative<br />

strategists based their theories on common knowledge their<br />

books on strategy were addressed to laymen.(10,<br />

Introduction) Each of such theories does not suggest a list of<br />

technical orders imparted to subordinate people, but a new<br />

method, which each soldier can interiorise.(1,11,21)<br />

iii) The entire synthetic method was qualified in semiformal<br />

terms by L. Carnot as the method of the ‘adjunctions’<br />

to a given system, which is so generalised that the search<br />

for a solution is made easier; after the desired solution is<br />

obtained, it is introduced, by suppressing auxiliary variables,<br />

to the initial system. For instance, in the (ancient)<br />

infinitesimal analysis one adds to a mathematical system to<br />

be solved some auxiliary variables, commonly called<br />

infinitesimals; which, after the solution is obtained, are<br />

"suppressed". In his mechanics, L. Carnot added<br />

“geometrical motions”, which in the simplest case represent<br />

changes in the reference frames, and which in general<br />

constitute a group of transformations; in fact, Carnot started<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!