Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
0 DNA (evidence for evolution)<br />
second table). Humans and chimps shared all <strong>of</strong> them; gorillas<br />
and orangutans shared five <strong>of</strong> them with humans; the<br />
rhesus monkey, an Old World monkey, shared three <strong>of</strong> them<br />
with humans; the capuchin monkey, a New World monkey,<br />
shared one; the hamster had none <strong>of</strong> the six pseudogenes.<br />
This pattern corresponded perfectly to the primate evolutionary<br />
lineage.<br />
Humans and chimpanzees. Two species <strong>of</strong> chimpanzees<br />
are the living animals most closely related to Homo sapiens.<br />
Humans and chimpanzees have a 99 percent similarity <strong>of</strong> nucleotide<br />
base sequences. The genetic differences between humans<br />
and chimpanzees have major effects but are few in number.<br />
The molecular clock also suggests that the evolutionary lineages<br />
leading to humans and to chimps may have diverged as recently<br />
as five million years ago (see australopithecines).<br />
Modern human diversity. Most anthropologists are now<br />
convinced that African hominins (similar to Homo ergaster)<br />
spread throughout Europe (as Homo HeiDelbergensis)<br />
and Asia (evolving into Homo erectus). H. erectus<br />
became extinct. H. heidelbergensis evolved into neandertals<br />
and became extinct. The only survivors were the H. ergaster<br />
individuals that remained in Africa and evolved into H. sapiens<br />
in Africa between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago. This<br />
is consistent with the fossil evidence, which shows H. sapiens<br />
appearing only in Africa, and then spreading around the<br />
world. This has been called the Out <strong>of</strong> Africa hypothesis.<br />
If the Out <strong>of</strong> Africa hypothesis is correct, then there<br />
should be very little DNA variability among modern<br />
humans. University <strong>of</strong> California geneticists Allan Wilson,<br />
Mark Stoneking, and Rebecca Cann analyzed mtDNA<br />
from 150 women from Africa, Asia, Europe, Australia, and<br />
New Guinea. By using computers that can make thousands<br />
<strong>of</strong> comparisons among the nucleotide sequences <strong>of</strong> DNA,<br />
the researchers were able to reconstruct a human family<br />
tree. Their results showed that the evolutionary divergence<br />
<strong>of</strong> human races was relatively recent, having occurred only<br />
100,000 to 200,000 years ago. Because mtDNA is inherited<br />
only through mothers, the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the Wilson group<br />
has been popularized as the “mitochondrial Eve” or “African<br />
Eve.” Their results also showed that DNA variability in the<br />
human species is very low, compared to the variability found<br />
in populations <strong>of</strong> most other species. The greatest degree <strong>of</strong><br />
variability was from the African samples, which implies that<br />
the evolution <strong>of</strong> H. sapiens has been going on in Africa longer<br />
than anywhere else.<br />
More than a decade <strong>of</strong> study since the original report<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Wilson group has failed to find human genetic variation<br />
outside <strong>of</strong> Africa that cannot be found within African<br />
populations. More recent studies on nuclear genes confirm<br />
the pattern that was revealed by mtDNA. Studies on the Y<br />
chromosome suggest that the pattern inherited through males<br />
is the same as that inherited through females. Not surprisingly,<br />
the Y chromosome studies have been popularized as<br />
the “African Adam.” These results indicate that all modern<br />
humans share a recent African origin.<br />
These results also indicate that all non-African human<br />
populations were originally emigrants from Africa. Ancestors <strong>of</strong><br />
aborigines left Africa and arrived in Australia over 60,000 years<br />
ago. Their burial customs, and the fact that they would have to<br />
Investigators compared nucleotide sequence differences between<br />
different humans; between humans and Neandertals; and between<br />
humans and chimpanzees. The comparisons were made between<br />
homologous (corresponding) locations on chromosomes. The narrow<br />
vertical lines represent approximate standard deviations <strong>of</strong> the data.<br />
Comparisons among humans averaged eight nucleotide differences;<br />
comparisons between humans and Neandertals averaged , over three<br />
times as great; and comparisons between humans and chimpanzees<br />
averaged about . Neandertals differed from humans about half as much<br />
as chimpanzees differ from humans.<br />
build boats to reach Australia, strongly suggest that the people<br />
who colonized Australia were fully modern humans. Bones <strong>of</strong><br />
some <strong>of</strong> these people, found in Mungo by anthropologist Alan<br />
Thorne, appear to be 62,000 years old. Mitochondrial DNA<br />
extracted from the Mungo bones is outside the modern range<br />
<strong>of</strong> human genetic variation, which to some researchers suggests<br />
that they came from a population <strong>of</strong> humans that no longer<br />
exists. However, the Mungo DNA is only slightly outside the<br />
range <strong>of</strong> modern humans, and most researchers do not consider<br />
it to discredit the Out <strong>of</strong> Africa hypothesis.<br />
Humans and Neandertals. Another test <strong>of</strong> the hypothesis<br />
that all modern humans are descended from African H. sapiens<br />
would be to compare modern humans with Neandertals.<br />
Comparisons <strong>of</strong> bone structure have suggested that Neandertals<br />
were a separate lineage <strong>of</strong> evolution from H. ergaster.<br />
However, a DNA comparison would clinch the case. It<br />
would seem impossible to find Neandertal DNA—they have<br />
been extinct for almost 30,000 years—but the laboratory <strong>of</strong><br />
Svante Pääbo was able to obtain a little bit <strong>of</strong> mtDNA from<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the youngest Neandertal bones. Because mtDNA<br />
is so much more abundant than nuclear DNA, it was more<br />
likely to be preserved in these ancient bones. The Neandertal<br />
DNA turned out to have a base sequence very different from<br />
that <strong>of</strong> any modern human (see Neandertals). Since 1997,