24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

0 DNA (evidence for evolution)<br />

second table). Humans and chimps shared all <strong>of</strong> them; gorillas<br />

and orangutans shared five <strong>of</strong> them with humans; the<br />

rhesus monkey, an Old World monkey, shared three <strong>of</strong> them<br />

with humans; the capuchin monkey, a New World monkey,<br />

shared one; the hamster had none <strong>of</strong> the six pseudogenes.<br />

This pattern corresponded perfectly to the primate evolutionary<br />

lineage.<br />

Humans and chimpanzees. Two species <strong>of</strong> chimpanzees<br />

are the living animals most closely related to Homo sapiens.<br />

Humans and chimpanzees have a 99 percent similarity <strong>of</strong> nucleotide<br />

base sequences. The genetic differences between humans<br />

and chimpanzees have major effects but are few in number.<br />

The molecular clock also suggests that the evolutionary lineages<br />

leading to humans and to chimps may have diverged as recently<br />

as five million years ago (see australopithecines).<br />

Modern human diversity. Most anthropologists are now<br />

convinced that African hominins (similar to Homo ergaster)<br />

spread throughout Europe (as Homo HeiDelbergensis)<br />

and Asia (evolving into Homo erectus). H. erectus<br />

became extinct. H. heidelbergensis evolved into neandertals<br />

and became extinct. The only survivors were the H. ergaster<br />

individuals that remained in Africa and evolved into H. sapiens<br />

in Africa between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago. This<br />

is consistent with the fossil evidence, which shows H. sapiens<br />

appearing only in Africa, and then spreading around the<br />

world. This has been called the Out <strong>of</strong> Africa hypothesis.<br />

If the Out <strong>of</strong> Africa hypothesis is correct, then there<br />

should be very little DNA variability among modern<br />

humans. University <strong>of</strong> California geneticists Allan Wilson,<br />

Mark Stoneking, and Rebecca Cann analyzed mtDNA<br />

from 150 women from Africa, Asia, Europe, Australia, and<br />

New Guinea. By using computers that can make thousands<br />

<strong>of</strong> comparisons among the nucleotide sequences <strong>of</strong> DNA,<br />

the researchers were able to reconstruct a human family<br />

tree. Their results showed that the evolutionary divergence<br />

<strong>of</strong> human races was relatively recent, having occurred only<br />

100,000 to 200,000 years ago. Because mtDNA is inherited<br />

only through mothers, the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the Wilson group<br />

has been popularized as the “mitochondrial Eve” or “African<br />

Eve.” Their results also showed that DNA variability in the<br />

human species is very low, compared to the variability found<br />

in populations <strong>of</strong> most other species. The greatest degree <strong>of</strong><br />

variability was from the African samples, which implies that<br />

the evolution <strong>of</strong> H. sapiens has been going on in Africa longer<br />

than anywhere else.<br />

More than a decade <strong>of</strong> study since the original report<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Wilson group has failed to find human genetic variation<br />

outside <strong>of</strong> Africa that cannot be found within African<br />

populations. More recent studies on nuclear genes confirm<br />

the pattern that was revealed by mtDNA. Studies on the Y<br />

chromosome suggest that the pattern inherited through males<br />

is the same as that inherited through females. Not surprisingly,<br />

the Y chromosome studies have been popularized as<br />

the “African Adam.” These results indicate that all modern<br />

humans share a recent African origin.<br />

These results also indicate that all non-African human<br />

populations were originally emigrants from Africa. Ancestors <strong>of</strong><br />

aborigines left Africa and arrived in Australia over 60,000 years<br />

ago. Their burial customs, and the fact that they would have to<br />

Investigators compared nucleotide sequence differences between<br />

different humans; between humans and Neandertals; and between<br />

humans and chimpanzees. The comparisons were made between<br />

homologous (corresponding) locations on chromosomes. The narrow<br />

vertical lines represent approximate standard deviations <strong>of</strong> the data.<br />

Comparisons among humans averaged eight nucleotide differences;<br />

comparisons between humans and Neandertals averaged , over three<br />

times as great; and comparisons between humans and chimpanzees<br />

averaged about . Neandertals differed from humans about half as much<br />

as chimpanzees differ from humans.<br />

build boats to reach Australia, strongly suggest that the people<br />

who colonized Australia were fully modern humans. Bones <strong>of</strong><br />

some <strong>of</strong> these people, found in Mungo by anthropologist Alan<br />

Thorne, appear to be 62,000 years old. Mitochondrial DNA<br />

extracted from the Mungo bones is outside the modern range<br />

<strong>of</strong> human genetic variation, which to some researchers suggests<br />

that they came from a population <strong>of</strong> humans that no longer<br />

exists. However, the Mungo DNA is only slightly outside the<br />

range <strong>of</strong> modern humans, and most researchers do not consider<br />

it to discredit the Out <strong>of</strong> Africa hypothesis.<br />

Humans and Neandertals. Another test <strong>of</strong> the hypothesis<br />

that all modern humans are descended from African H. sapiens<br />

would be to compare modern humans with Neandertals.<br />

Comparisons <strong>of</strong> bone structure have suggested that Neandertals<br />

were a separate lineage <strong>of</strong> evolution from H. ergaster.<br />

However, a DNA comparison would clinch the case. It<br />

would seem impossible to find Neandertal DNA—they have<br />

been extinct for almost 30,000 years—but the laboratory <strong>of</strong><br />

Svante Pääbo was able to obtain a little bit <strong>of</strong> mtDNA from<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the youngest Neandertal bones. Because mtDNA<br />

is so much more abundant than nuclear DNA, it was more<br />

likely to be preserved in these ancient bones. The Neandertal<br />

DNA turned out to have a base sequence very different from<br />

that <strong>of</strong> any modern human (see Neandertals). Since 1997,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!