Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DNA (raw material <strong>of</strong> evolution)<br />
DNA is the basis <strong>of</strong> inheritance and <strong>of</strong> evolution. DNA, or<br />
deoxyribonucleic acid, is important to evolutionary science in<br />
four ways:<br />
• Because <strong>of</strong> DNA, traits are heritable.<br />
• Because <strong>of</strong> DNA, traits are mutable.<br />
• The study <strong>of</strong> DNA allows comparisons <strong>of</strong> evolutionary<br />
divergence to be made among individuals (see DNA [evidence<br />
for evolution]).<br />
• The study <strong>of</strong> DNA allows the genetic variability <strong>of</strong> populations<br />
to be assessed (see population genetics).<br />
In order for natural selection to work on traits within<br />
a population, those traits must be heritable (see natural<br />
selection). Characteristics that are induced by environmental<br />
conditions, though sometimes called adaptations, are<br />
not heritable (see adaptation). Scientists, and most other<br />
people, have long known that traits are passed on from one<br />
generation to another, that organisms reproduce not only<br />
“after their own kind” but that the <strong>of</strong>fspring resemble their<br />
parents more than they resemble the other members <strong>of</strong> the<br />
population. Some scientists in the 17th century believed that<br />
tiny versions <strong>of</strong> organisms were contained within the reproductive<br />
cells, such as homonculi within sperm; that is, entire<br />
structures were passed on from one generation to another,<br />
a theory called preformation. Other scientists believed that<br />
structures formed spontaneously from formless material,<br />
a theory called epigenesis. They were both partly right and<br />
partly wrong. In the 20th century scientists discovered that<br />
the instructions for making the structure, rather than the<br />
structure itself, were passed from one generation to another<br />
through the reproductive cells.<br />
In the 19th century, many scientists believed that characteristics<br />
that an organism acquired during its lifetime could be<br />
passed on to later generations. The scientist most remembered<br />
for this theory is Jean Baptiste de Lamarck (see Lamarckism).<br />
The inheritance <strong>of</strong> acquired characteristics was not his<br />
special theory, but rather the common assumption <strong>of</strong> scientists<br />
in his day. Until Gregor Mendel (see Mendel, Gregor;<br />
Mendelian genetics), nobody had performed experiments<br />
that would adequately test these assumptions. Charles Darwin<br />
(see Darwin, Charles) was so perplexed and frustrated<br />
by the general lack <strong>of</strong> scientific understanding <strong>of</strong> inheritance<br />
that he invented his own theory: pangenesis, in which “gemmules”<br />
from the body’s cells worked their way to the reproductive<br />
organs and lodged there, carrying acquired genetic<br />
information with them. His theory was essentially the same<br />
as Lamarck’s, and equally wrong. Darwin either had never<br />
heard <strong>of</strong> Mendel’s work or overlooked its significance.<br />
How DNA Stores Genetic Information<br />
By the early 20th century, data had accumulated that a chemical<br />
transmitted genetic information from one generation to the<br />
next, and that the chemical was DNA. In 1928 microbiologist<br />
Frederick Griffith performed an experiment in which a harmless<br />
strain <strong>of</strong> bacteria was transformed into a deadly strain <strong>of</strong><br />
bacteria by exposing the harmless bacteria to dead bacteria <strong>of</strong><br />
the deadly strain. Some chemical from the dead bacteria had<br />
transformed the live harmless bacteria permanently into generation<br />
after generation <strong>of</strong> deadly bacteria. Research in 1944 by<br />
geneticist Oswald Avery and associates established that it was<br />
the DNA, not proteins, that caused the transformation that<br />
Griffith had observed. Research in 1953 by geneticists Alfred<br />
Hershey and Martha Chase established that it was the DNA,<br />
not the proteins, <strong>of</strong> viruses that allowed them to reproduce:<br />
The DNA from inside the old viruses produced new viruses,<br />
while the protein coats were merely shed and lost.<br />
Many scientists doubted that DNA could be the basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> inheritance and suspected that proteins might carry the<br />
genetic information. DNA was a minor component <strong>of</strong> cells,<br />
compared to the abundance <strong>of</strong> protein. Furthermore, DNA<br />
was a structurally simple molecule, compared to proteins,<br />
and was thus considered unlikely to carry enough genetic<br />
information. It was not until the structure <strong>of</strong> DNA was<br />
explained by chemists James Watson and Sir Francis Crick in<br />
1953, based upon their data and data from colleagues such as<br />
chemist Rosalind Franklin, that DNA became a truly believable<br />
molecule for the transmission <strong>of</strong> genetic information.<br />
DNA is an enormously long molecule made up <strong>of</strong><br />
smaller nucleotides (see figure on page 133). Each nucleotide<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> a sugar, a phosphate, and a nitrogenous base. In<br />
DNA, the sugar is always deoxyribose. The nitrogenous base<br />
in a DNA nucleotide is always one <strong>of</strong> the following: adenine,<br />
guanine, cytosine, or thymine. The general public has been<br />
well exposed to the abbreviations <strong>of</strong> these bases (A, G, C,<br />
and T). The nucleotides are arranged in two parallel strands,<br />
like a rope ladder. The parallel sides <strong>of</strong> the ladder consist<br />
<strong>of</strong> alternating molecules <strong>of</strong> phosphate and sugar. The rungs<br />
consist <strong>of</strong> the nitrogenous bases meeting together in the center.<br />
A large base is always opposite a small base, and the correct<br />
bonds must form; therefore, A is always opposite T, and<br />
C is always opposite G. Because <strong>of</strong> this, both strands <strong>of</strong> DNA<br />
contain mirror-images <strong>of</strong> the same information: if one strand<br />
is ACCTGAGGT, the other strand must be TGGACTCCA.<br />
DNA not only stores information but stores it in a stable<br />
fashion: All <strong>of</strong> the information in one strand is mirrored in<br />
the other strand. If mutations occur in one strand, the base<br />
sequence in the other strand can be used to correct them.<br />
Mutations in DNA are usually but not always corrected. All<br />
cells use DNA to store genetic information. Therefore the<br />
mutations that occur in one strand are frequently corrected<br />
by an enzyme that consults the other strand.<br />
Mutations occur relatively infrequently, and evolution<br />
proceeds slowly, in all species <strong>of</strong> organisms. Some viruses<br />
(which are not true organisms) use a related molecule, RNA<br />
(ribonucleic acid), to store genetic information. RNA is single-stranded,<br />
and its mutations cannot be corrected. Because<br />
<strong>of</strong> this, RNA viruses evolve much more rapidly than DNA<br />
viruses. RNA viruses such as colds and influenza evolve so<br />
rapidly that the human immune system cannot keep up with<br />
them. This is why a new flu vaccine is needed every year.<br />
Last year’s flu vaccine is effective only against last year’s<br />
viruses. In contrast, DNA viruses such as the ones that cause<br />
poliomyelitis (polio) evolve slowly enough that old forms <strong>of</strong><br />
the vaccine are still effective. The human immunodeficiency<br />
virus is an RNA virus and evolves rapidly (see AIDS, evolution<br />
<strong>of</strong>).<br />
DNA is capable <strong>of</strong> replication. If the two strands separate,<br />
new nucleotides can line up and form new strands that<br />
exactly mirror the exposed strands. In this way, one DNA