Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Wallace, Alfred Russel<br />
knew they would be controversial, and he wanted to amass<br />
all available evidence into a huge book that would answer<br />
every possible objection and settle the question. Therefore<br />
Darwin delayed 20 years, while Wallace was ready to publish<br />
right away.<br />
Darwin was astounded that, after this long delay, another<br />
scientist had come up with the same ideas, even using the<br />
same term to describe the process. Darwin said, “I never saw<br />
a more striking coincidence. If Wallace had my manuscript<br />
sketch written out in 1842, he could not have made a better<br />
short abstract.” In consultation with the famous geologist Sir<br />
Charles Lyell (see Lyell, Charles), Darwin decided that his<br />
1842 summary <strong>of</strong> natural selection should be presented and<br />
published jointly with Wallace’s article. Darwin was ill, so<br />
Lyell presented the joint Darwin-Wallace paper to the Linnaean<br />
Society in 1858. Strangely, the scientists in attendance<br />
took little notice <strong>of</strong> the paper, nor did the president <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Linnaean Society who summarized the events <strong>of</strong> 1858 as unremarkable.<br />
Wallace, still in Indonesia, knew nothing <strong>of</strong> this.<br />
While in Indonesia, Wallace noticed that the animals on<br />
the island <strong>of</strong> Lombok differed strikingly from the animals <strong>of</strong><br />
Bali, and those <strong>of</strong> Borneo differed from those <strong>of</strong> Sulawesi.<br />
The mammals <strong>of</strong> Lombok and Borneo included many marsupials<br />
(see mammals, evolution <strong>of</strong>) and few large predators,<br />
while the animals <strong>of</strong> Bali and Sulawesi were mostly placental<br />
mammals and included large predators such as tigers.<br />
He also noticed a difference in the birds. In some cases, the<br />
islands with different animals were almost within sight <strong>of</strong> one<br />
another. The line he drew on the map to separate the two<br />
faunas is now known as Wallace’s Line. Wallace interpreted<br />
this, correctly, as resulting from the separate evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
two groups <strong>of</strong> animals. He could not have known that a deep<br />
ocean trench separated the two groups, which were on different<br />
continental plates (see continental drift) and which<br />
had therefore had little contact throughout geological history.<br />
Wallace’s line is considered one <strong>of</strong> the earliest major contributions<br />
to the science <strong>of</strong> biogeography.<br />
After returning to England in 1862, Wallace spent three<br />
years organizing his specimens, presenting papers to scientific<br />
meetings, and writing. He earned money from his famously<br />
interesting public presentations; one speaking tour took him<br />
as far as California. His striking appearance (he was tall, had<br />
a long beard, and snow-white hair for the last 40 years <strong>of</strong> his<br />
life) contributed to his public success. He married a woman<br />
almost 20 years younger than he, but she shared his passion<br />
for gardening and natural history. Later, they journeyed overseas<br />
on botanizing expeditions. Although his collections and<br />
writings proved pr<strong>of</strong>itable, his investments did not. He had to<br />
take on small editing and speaking assignments for pay and<br />
move his family progressively further from London to find<br />
cheaper accommodations. Eventually, Darwin intervened to<br />
convince the British government to give Wallace an annual<br />
stipend in recognition <strong>of</strong> his services to science.<br />
Wallace continued his studies <strong>of</strong> evolution and advanced<br />
into other areas <strong>of</strong> science. His paper, “The Origin <strong>of</strong> Human<br />
Races and the Antiquity <strong>of</strong> Man Deduced from the Theory<br />
<strong>of</strong> Natural Selection,” presented in 1864, preceded Darwin’s<br />
book The Descent <strong>of</strong> Man (see Descent <strong>of</strong> man [book]) by<br />
seven years. Wallace published a paper in 1863 that gave an<br />
evolutionary explanation for the hexagonal construction <strong>of</strong><br />
the cells in beehives, a topic Darwin incorporated into later<br />
editions <strong>of</strong> the Origin <strong>of</strong> Species. Wallace also published a<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> glaciation and evolutionary explanations <strong>of</strong> mimicry,<br />
protective coloration, and color vision in animals, bird<br />
migration, and the necessity <strong>of</strong> aging. He was one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
first to present evidence that the Pleistocene extinction<br />
may have been caused by overhunting by humans. His writings<br />
were among the earliest that contrasted different kinds<br />
<strong>of</strong> life history in animals (see life history, evolution <strong>of</strong>).<br />
His ideas about the evolution <strong>of</strong> reproductive isolation (see<br />
isolating mechanisms) have even been called the “Wallace<br />
Effect.” He wrote in 1907 that the ice caps <strong>of</strong> Mars were carbon<br />
dioxide (dry ice), not water.<br />
Wallace also expanded his studies into many different<br />
areas throughout the remainder <strong>of</strong> his life. He began to<br />
give serious time and attention to social issues, in which he<br />
defended the causes <strong>of</strong> the working man and the oppressed.<br />
His views may be mainly attributed to his experiences with<br />
Amazonian, Indonesian, and Papuan peoples, and to his<br />
exposure to socialism when he worked as a surveyor. Among<br />
the social issues he championed are:<br />
• Land nationalization. Wallace called for the protection <strong>of</strong><br />
rural lands and historical monuments, the formation <strong>of</strong><br />
greenbelts and parks, for the preservation <strong>of</strong> nature but<br />
also for the recreation <strong>of</strong> the lower and middle classes.<br />
• Labor reform. Rather than calling for strikes, Wallace in<br />
1899 called for workingmen to lay aside a portion <strong>of</strong> their<br />
salaries into a fund that would allow them to buy stock in<br />
the company and thereby partly or wholly control the company.<br />
He also called for double overtime pay rates. Later in<br />
life he fully converted to socialism.<br />
• Opposition to vaccination. This issue puzzles many modern<br />
scientists: Why would one <strong>of</strong> the most prominent scientists<br />
in Europe oppose vaccination? Wallace had both scientific<br />
and social reasons for it. Scientifically, he could demonstrate<br />
with epidemiological data that the incidence <strong>of</strong> contagious<br />
diseases began to decline before the introduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> vaccination. Today scientists know that he was correct:<br />
Advances in public hygiene have proved at least as important<br />
as vaccination in improving public health. Socially,<br />
Wallace saw vaccination as the government’s way <strong>of</strong> trying<br />
to improve the lot <strong>of</strong> the poor without having to spend the<br />
money necessary for public sanitation. It was much cheaper<br />
and easier to jab poor people in the arm than to build sewers<br />
and provide safe drinking water.<br />
• Women’s suffrage. He was one <strong>of</strong> the earliest proponents <strong>of</strong><br />
voting rights for women in male intellectual society.<br />
• Consumer safety. Wallace proposed in 1885 that all manufactured<br />
items have labels that identify their component<br />
materials, and that the government regulate standards for<br />
these materials.<br />
• Eugenics. Wallace criticized the attempt, then popular<br />
among scientists, including Darwin’s cousin (see Galton,<br />
Francis), to attribute social problems to the supposed