24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to evolutionary science. He also applied his scientific viewpoint<br />

to religion and ethics.<br />

Born May 4, 1825, into a large and not affluent family,<br />

Thomas Huxley had limited formal education. However, he<br />

read voraciously in many scholarly fields. He won a scholarship<br />

to study medicine at a hospital in London. At age 21,<br />

he became the assistant surgeon on HMS Rattlesnake, during<br />

a voyage to map the seas around Australia. Huxley collected<br />

and studied marine invertebrates (see invertebrates,<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong>). He became an expert in natural history the<br />

same way that Charles Darwin had on HMS Beagle and<br />

Joseph Hooker had on HMS Erebus. Huxley sent specimens<br />

and notes back to England, and when he returned in 1850<br />

he found that these specimens and notes had made him a<br />

celebrity among English scientists, just as had happened with<br />

Darwin. He became acquainted with the leading natural scientists<br />

<strong>of</strong> his day (see Lyell, Charles; Hooker, Joseph<br />

Dalton). Huxley supported himself on a Navy stipend and<br />

by writing popular scientific articles. In 1854 he was hired<br />

by the School <strong>of</strong> Mines as a lecturer, a position he retained<br />

until retirement.<br />

Although he initially opposed evolution, especially the<br />

version proposed in the Vestiges <strong>of</strong> Creation (see Chambers,<br />

Robert), Huxley became convinced <strong>of</strong> evolution by<br />

reading the Origin <strong>of</strong> Species. His reaction to it was something<br />

like, “How stupid <strong>of</strong> me not to have thought <strong>of</strong> that.”<br />

Accustomed to lecturing and to popular writing, Huxley<br />

was ready to champion the theory that Charles Darwin<br />

was, due to a quiet nature and illness, reluctant to defend<br />

in public.<br />

Huxley’s most famous public moment was at the 1860<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the British Association at Oxford University,<br />

where he debated Bishop Samuel Wiberforce, known as<br />

“Soapy Sam” because <strong>of</strong> the slippery debate maneuvers<br />

for which he was famous. Wilberforce knew little about<br />

science but had been coached by a famous paleontologist<br />

(see Owen, Richard). Wilberforce could not resist a jab<br />

at Huxley, asking him whether he traced his descent from<br />

the apes on his mother’s side or his father’s side. Huxley<br />

muttered, “The Lord hath delivered him into my hands,”<br />

referring to the harm Wilberforce had done to his own<br />

position by this statement. Huxley said, according to his<br />

own account, “If then the question is put to me would I<br />

rather have a miserable ape for a grandfather or a man<br />

highly endowed by nature and possessed <strong>of</strong> great means<br />

<strong>of</strong> influence and yet who employs these faculties and that<br />

influence for the mere purpose <strong>of</strong> introducing ridicule into<br />

a grave scientific discussion, I unhesitatingly affirm my<br />

preference for the ape.” The debate was just one part <strong>of</strong><br />

a series <strong>of</strong> speeches, and its importance was dramatically<br />

exaggerated in 20th-century accounts. Wilberforce has<br />

been portrayed as a vicious attacker <strong>of</strong> evolutionary scientists,<br />

while in reality Darwin and Wilberforce were on reasonably<br />

good terms. Wilberforce referred to Darwin as “a<br />

capital fellow.” Furthermore, the main defense <strong>of</strong> Darwin’s<br />

theory at this meeting was made by Joseph Hooker, not<br />

Huxley. However, the audience saw this meeting as much<br />

Huxley, Thomas Henry 0<br />

more than a scientific debate about zoology. The captain<br />

with whom Charles Darwin had sailed around the world<br />

walked around, holding up a Bible, saying, “The Book! The<br />

Book!” (see FitzRoy, Robert).<br />

Although he was a bulldog, Huxley was ready to<br />

admit mistakes and correct his viewpoints. He visited the<br />

United States to present lectures on the evolution <strong>of</strong> horses<br />

(see horses, evolution <strong>of</strong>). Fossil horses from Europe<br />

seemed to indicate that the modern horse genus, Equus,<br />

had evolved there. American paleontologist Othniel C.<br />

Marsh, however, showed Huxley evidence that horses had<br />

evolved in North America, and some <strong>of</strong> them had migrated<br />

to Europe. Huxley completely and immediately rewrote his<br />

speeches. In another instance, Huxley became convinced<br />

that the ocean floor was covered with a formless ooze that<br />

might have been an amoebalike primitive organism, which<br />

he called Bathybius haeckelii, named after another famous<br />

paleontologist (see Haeckel, Ernst). It turned out that the<br />

ooze was simply a chemical product <strong>of</strong> the reaction <strong>of</strong> mud<br />

with alcohol (used to preserve the specimens). Huxley also<br />

admitted this error.<br />

Huxley took Darwin’s theory further than Darwin had<br />

dared to propose in writing. Darwin wrote in the Origin <strong>of</strong><br />

Species that “Much light will be thrown on the origin <strong>of</strong> man<br />

and his history.” In 1963 Huxley published Man’s Place in<br />

Nature, which explicitly presented the fossil evidence for the<br />

evolutionary place <strong>of</strong> humankind among the apes. Because<br />

little was known about human prehistory, aside from recently<br />

discovered skull fragments <strong>of</strong> Neandertals, most <strong>of</strong> Huxley’s<br />

evidence was to show the many anatomical similarities<br />

between humans and other primates. This brought him into<br />

conflict with Richard Owen, who insisted that the human<br />

brain had a structure, the hippocampus minor, that was not<br />

present in the brains <strong>of</strong> other primates. As more evidence<br />

became available about gorillas and chimpanzees, both<br />

recently discovered by Europeans, it became obvious that<br />

Owen was wrong.<br />

Especially in his later years, Huxley gave much attention<br />

to ethics. He had rejected organized religion, yet was unwilling<br />

to conclude that God could not exist. The term agnostic,<br />

referring to someone who believes the existence <strong>of</strong> God cannot<br />

be known, was Huxley’s invention. In <strong>Evolution</strong> and Ethics,<br />

Huxley claimed an evolutionary origin for human behavior<br />

but also noted that large brains give humans the ability<br />

to behave differently than other animals (see evolutionary<br />

ethics). In saying that good ethics consists <strong>of</strong> resisting rather<br />

than embracing the tendencies <strong>of</strong> evolution, he placed his<br />

philosophy firmly against those <strong>of</strong> the social Darwinists (see<br />

Spencer, Herbert) and the eugenicists (see eugenics).<br />

Huxley’s passion for science and scholarship established<br />

a tradition in his family. One <strong>of</strong> his grandchildren (see Huxley,<br />

Julian) was one <strong>of</strong> the scientists who established the<br />

modern synthesis <strong>of</strong> evolution; another grandson, Andrew<br />

Huxley, won the Nobel Prize for his study <strong>of</strong> nerve impulses<br />

and muscle contraction; another grandson, Aldous Huxley,<br />

was a writer, most famous for Brave New World. Thomas<br />

Henry Huxley died June 29, 1895.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!