Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
adaptive radiation<br />
they can use them for eating leaves from treetops, but that is<br />
not the original reason that long necks evolved in these animals.<br />
The long neck <strong>of</strong> the giraffe, therefore, is an adaptation<br />
to combat, and an exaptation for reaching leaves at the tops<br />
<strong>of</strong> trees.<br />
4. True adaptations. The only true adaptations, according<br />
to many evolutionary scientists, are the genetic changes<br />
that result from natural selection favoring those actual traits.<br />
For each <strong>of</strong> the preceding eight definitions, the term adaptation<br />
can refer either to the evolutionary process (natural<br />
selection) or to the product. This leads to 16 meanings <strong>of</strong> adaptation.<br />
As explained above, however, much clarity is achieved<br />
by restricting the use <strong>of</strong> the term to just two: the process and<br />
product <strong>of</strong> evolution acting directly on a characteristic.<br />
In most cases, a characteristic is not an adaptation with<br />
just a single function. Most characteristics are adaptations<br />
with numerous evolutionary causes. For example, the glands<br />
within an animal’s epidermis are an adaptation with several<br />
functions, each <strong>of</strong> which may have provided a separate evolutionary<br />
advantage. Some <strong>of</strong> the glands produce sweat, which<br />
allows the animal to become cooler as the sweat evaporates.<br />
Sweat also contains dissolved molecules. The body <strong>of</strong> the animal<br />
uses sweat as one <strong>of</strong> its methods <strong>of</strong> disposing <strong>of</strong> excess or<br />
toxic materials. Molecules in sweat can also serve as chemical<br />
communication between animals. Mammary glands are modified<br />
sweat glands. Sweat glands, therefore, are an adaptation<br />
to at least four different functions.<br />
Once a true adaptation has been identified, an evolutionary<br />
scientist may attempt to test a hypothesis to explain how<br />
and why it evolved. To test a hypothesis, scientists need to<br />
obtain as large a sample <strong>of</strong> data as possible (see scientific<br />
method). These data must be independent <strong>of</strong> one another,<br />
rather than repeated measures on the same phenomenon.<br />
Recently evolutionary scientists noticed that testing hypotheses<br />
about adaptation requires observations in which the<br />
adaptation has evolved independently. They refer to these<br />
observations as phylogenetically independent. As an example,<br />
consider small leaves as an adaptation for bushes that live in<br />
dry conditions, and large leaves as an adaptation for bushes<br />
that live in moist conditions. The scientist determines the<br />
average leaf area for each <strong>of</strong> 12 species that live in different<br />
moisture conditions and finds that there is a positive correlation<br />
between leaf size and moisture. If these 12 species represent<br />
six species from a small-leaved genus that lives in dry<br />
climates, and six species from a large-leaved genus that lives<br />
in moist climates, the number <strong>of</strong> independent observations is<br />
two, not 12. These 12 species evolved from just two ancestral<br />
species, one with small leaves, one with large leaves. If the<br />
investigator claims that bushes that live in dry climates have<br />
smaller leaves than those in moist climates, the investigator<br />
has only two, not 12, data to test the claim. The 12 species<br />
are not phylogenetically independent <strong>of</strong> one another. This<br />
phenomenon is called the phylogenetic effect.<br />
<strong>Evolution</strong>ary biologist Joseph Felsenstein determined a<br />
way around the problem <strong>of</strong> the phylogenetic effect. The investigator<br />
first identifies pairs <strong>of</strong> closely related species and then<br />
compares the two members <strong>of</strong> each pair with one another. If,<br />
within most <strong>of</strong> the pairs, the species from the drier climate<br />
has smaller leaves, then the investigator has six observations<br />
that test the claim.<br />
An excellent example <strong>of</strong> testing a hypothesis about adaptation,<br />
incorporating the phylogenetic effect, is the study<br />
by ecologists Angela Moles, David Ackerly, and colleagues.<br />
The hypothesis is that large seed size in plants is an adaptation<br />
to enhance the survival <strong>of</strong> seedlings in plant species that<br />
live a long time and grow to a large size (see life history,<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong>). Rather than calculating a simple correlation<br />
between seed size and body size in plants, the investigators<br />
produced a phylogenetic tree (see cladistics) <strong>of</strong> 12,987<br />
plant species and determined the evolutionary events in which<br />
significant changes in seed size occurred. They found that<br />
increases in seed size occurred along with evolutionary shifts<br />
toward large plant size. These investigators could conclude,<br />
with a great degree <strong>of</strong> confidence, that large seed size is an<br />
adaptation to large body size in plants.<br />
In order for adaptation to be a useful concept in evolutionary<br />
science, investigators restrict the use <strong>of</strong> the word to<br />
characteristics that result from the direct effects <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
selection, and they investigate adaptation using phylogenetically<br />
independent comparisons.<br />
Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />
Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Evolution</strong> Reveals a Universe Without Design. New York: Norton,<br />
1996.<br />
Felsenstein, Joseph. “Phylogenies and the comparative method.” The<br />
American Naturalist 125 (1985): 1–15.<br />
Gould, Stephen Jay. The Panda’s Thumb: More Reflections in Natural<br />
History. New York: Norton, 1980.<br />
———, and Richard Lewontin. “The spandrels <strong>of</strong> San Marco and<br />
the Panglossian paradigm: A critique <strong>of</strong> the adaptationist programme.”<br />
Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society <strong>of</strong> London B 205<br />
(1979): 581–598.<br />
———, and Elisabeth Vrba. “Exaptation—a missing term in the science<br />
<strong>of</strong> form. Paleobiology 8 (1982): 4–15.<br />
Moles, Angela T., et al. “A brief history <strong>of</strong> seed size.” Science 307<br />
(2005): 576–580.<br />
Sultan, Sonia E. “Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function,<br />
and life history.” Trends in Plant Science 5 (2000): 363–383.<br />
Van Kleunen, M. and M. Fischer. “Constraints on the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants.” New Phytologist 166<br />
(2005): 49–60.<br />
adaptive radiation Adaptive radiation is the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
many species from a single, ancestral population. Throughout<br />
the history <strong>of</strong> life, many species have become extinct, either<br />
by natural selection or simply bad luck (see extinction; mass<br />
extinctions), while others have produced many new species<br />
by adaptive radiation. The net result has been a steady increase<br />
in biodiversity through evolutionary time. Adaptive radiation<br />
occurs because the single ancestral population separates into<br />
distinct populations that do not interbreed, thus allowing separate<br />
directions <strong>of</strong> evolution to occur in each (see speciation).<br />
The world is full <strong>of</strong> numerous examples <strong>of</strong> adaptive radiation.<br />
Nearly every genus that contains more than one species,<br />
or any family that contains more than one genus, can be