24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

high priest, Aaron, brother <strong>of</strong> Moses. These males are known<br />

as kohanim, and today their last names have such variants<br />

as Cohen, Cohn, and Kahn. Researchers obtained DNA<br />

samples (from cheek cells) from modern Jewish men who<br />

identified themselves as kohanim, in Israel, North America,<br />

and England. About half <strong>of</strong> these shared a DNA sequence<br />

(a marker) in their Y chromosomes that had to come from a<br />

common ancestor about a hundred generations back—which<br />

was approximately the time that Aaron is believed to have<br />

lived. This Cohen Modal Haplotype may very well have<br />

come from Aaron’s Y chromosome. (A haplotype is a DNA<br />

sequence that is not broken up by sexual recombination; in<br />

many cases, haplotypes are genes, but in this case it is nearly<br />

the entire Y chromosome. Modal refers to the most frequent<br />

set <strong>of</strong> sequences found in this region <strong>of</strong> the chromosome in<br />

these men.)<br />

The Lemba tribe in southern Africa, though phenotypically<br />

black, claimed a tradition <strong>of</strong> Jewish ancestry. In 1997<br />

researchers studied Y chromosomes from men in this tribe.<br />

Two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the Y chromosomes in this sample were <strong>of</strong><br />

Middle Eastern, rather than Bantu African, origin. And most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Y chromosomes contained the Cohen Modal Haplotype,<br />

suggesting that they were not merely <strong>of</strong> Jewish descent<br />

but <strong>of</strong> Jewish priestly descent. In contrast, the mitochondrial<br />

DNA in this tribe was not <strong>of</strong> Jewish origin, strengthening the<br />

suggestion that this tribe is descended from Jewish men, not<br />

Jewish women.<br />

Jefferson’s descendants. Many historians believe that<br />

American president Thomas Jefferson produced <strong>of</strong>fspring<br />

through his slave and friend Sally Hemings. Researchers<br />

found a DNA marker that was shared between known white<br />

descendants <strong>of</strong> Thomas Jefferson and some black Americans<br />

who also had a family tradition <strong>of</strong> Jeffersonian descent. While<br />

most historians accept this as pro<strong>of</strong> that Thomas Jefferson<br />

had illegitimate <strong>of</strong>fspring, some point out that the DNA<br />

marker could just as easily have come from Thomas Jefferson’s<br />

brother, who was also present at the places and times<br />

when the <strong>of</strong>fspring would have been conceived. This example<br />

illustrates both the power and the limitations <strong>of</strong> DNA markers<br />

in genetic research.<br />

Markers are also used in cases <strong>of</strong> paternity identification<br />

and criminal investigation. Markers, not usually being subject<br />

to evolutionary forces, <strong>of</strong>ten change rapidly over time.<br />

A major application <strong>of</strong> markers to evolutionary science is to<br />

short-term studies <strong>of</strong> population genetics. Tracing the parentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> individual animals and plants in populations helps<br />

to reveal the patterns <strong>of</strong> mating and <strong>of</strong> reproductive success<br />

in these evolving populations.<br />

Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />

Ayres, Debra R., and Donald R. Strong. “Origin and genetic diversity<br />

<strong>of</strong> Spartina anglica (Poaceae) using nuclear DNA markers.”<br />

American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 88 (2001): 1,863–1,867.<br />

Drayna, Dennis. “Founder mutations.” Scientific American, October<br />

2005, 78–85.<br />

Haak, Wolfgang, et al. “Ancient DNA from the first European farmers<br />

in 7500-year-old Neolithic sites.” Science 310 (2005): 1,016–<br />

1,021. Summary by Michael Balter, Science 310 (2005): 964–965.<br />

Mars, life on<br />

Olson, Steve. Mapping Human History: Discovering the Past through<br />

Our Genes. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.<br />

Shreeve, James. “The greatest journey.” National Geographic, March<br />

2006, 60–73.<br />

Mars, life on Life-forms resembling the bacteria found on<br />

Earth may have once existed on Mars. When the evidence<br />

for this was first announced, some people considered it the<br />

most important discovery in the history <strong>of</strong> science. The evidence<br />

came from a Martian meteorite that was found in<br />

Antarctica. Had the evidence been confirmed, it would have<br />

indicated that the evolution <strong>of</strong> life from simple molecules<br />

was not an isolated event on the Earth. If life originated<br />

on two planets in the same solar system, it is quite likely to<br />

have occurred many times on many other planets throughout<br />

the universe.<br />

Mars is the planet most similar to Earth, in temperature<br />

and chemical composition, in the solar system. Jupiter<br />

and Saturn consist largely <strong>of</strong> cold liquids, while Venus<br />

is extremely hot. Some moons <strong>of</strong> Jupiter and Saturn are<br />

more likely to have conditions suitable for the origin <strong>of</strong> life,<br />

although they too are very cold. Scientists have long believed<br />

that, if life ever existed outside <strong>of</strong> the Earth, it would have<br />

been on Mars or on one <strong>of</strong> these moons.<br />

In recent years, astronomers have presented evidence<br />

for several planets orbiting other stars in the Milky Way<br />

galaxy. The first photograph <strong>of</strong> such a planet was published<br />

in 2005. Because these planets are usually too far away to<br />

be directly observed, the evidence for their existence is usually<br />

the gravitational force that they exert upon the stars<br />

around which they revolve. From the movements <strong>of</strong> these<br />

stars, the mass and orbit <strong>of</strong> the unseen planets can be calculated.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> these planets appear to be large and gaseous<br />

and very close to their stars (“hot Jupiters”). However, this<br />

does not mean that Earth-like planets are rare; small planets<br />

like Earth are much less likely to be detected by such<br />

methods. The presence <strong>of</strong> planets may also be inferred by<br />

periodic slight decreases in star luminosity, perhaps produced<br />

when the planet passes between the star and the<br />

human observer.<br />

The U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration<br />

(NASA) sent two spacecraft that landed on Mars in<br />

1976. These spacecraft sent back photographs and data, none<br />

<strong>of</strong> which indicated life on Mars. A burst <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide<br />

production from soil was thought at first to indicate microbial<br />

life on Mars, but scientists later decided that the carbon<br />

dioxide could have been produced by an inorganic reaction.<br />

Other spacecraft sent to Mars in 1997 and 2004 have sent<br />

back data that reinforce the conclusion that Mars is lifeless at<br />

the present time.<br />

But was there life on Mars in the past? Mars was a very<br />

different planet in the past than it is at present. When first<br />

formed, it was warm and had liquid water. The evidence for<br />

this comes from the following sources:<br />

• Satellites orbiting Mars have photographed geological patterns<br />

that appear to have been produced by water erosion<br />

(see photo on page 260).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!