24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Piltdown man<br />

found in slightly different forms (see convergence). All<br />

<strong>of</strong> the enzymes involved in the first cycle (which produces<br />

the acid) are used in other parts <strong>of</strong> the cell for other purposes.<br />

The enzyme that captures the carbon dioxide, PEP<br />

carboxylase, produces organic acids in all the cells <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plant. Therefore the evolution <strong>of</strong> C 4 photosynthesis did not<br />

require the origin <strong>of</strong> new chemical reactions but borrowed<br />

them from other parts <strong>of</strong> the cell.<br />

• CAM plants (which have Crassulacean Acid Metabolism)<br />

also have the same two carbon fixation cycles, but the first<br />

one (acid production) occurs at night, and the second one<br />

(the Calvin cycle) occurs in the daytime. Like C 4 photosynthesis,<br />

CAM appears to have evolved more than once, for<br />

it is found in some species in several plant families (such<br />

as the cactus, jade plant, and lily families) but not in their<br />

common ancestors.<br />

Both C4 and CAM pathways are adaptations to hot, dry<br />

conditions:<br />

• Rubisco, the enzyme that fixes carbon dioxide in the Calvin<br />

cycle, is inhibited by oxygen. However, PEP carboxylase,<br />

the enzyme that fixes carbon dioxide in the first cycle<br />

<strong>of</strong> C4 photosynthesis, is not inhibited by oxygen. On a hot<br />

dry day, leaves <strong>of</strong>ten close their pores (stomata) to prevent<br />

excessive water loss. This causes a buildup <strong>of</strong> oxygen inside<br />

the leaves. This oxygen buildup causes the photosynthesis<br />

<strong>of</strong> C3 plants to slow down but does not inhibit the photosynthesis<br />

<strong>of</strong> C4 plants. Therefore, in hot dry climates, C4 plants can continue making food under conditions that<br />

would cause C3 plants to stop making food. Because the<br />

carbon fixation in C4 plants has two cycles rather than just<br />

one, it is more expensive; but in hot dry climates the extra<br />

expense is worth the cost. However, in cool moist climates,<br />

the expense is not worth the cost. Therefore C4 plants are<br />

relatively more common in hot dry climates (usually grasslands)<br />

and C3 plants in cool, moist climates. C4 photosynthesis<br />

has also evolved in some aquatic plants, because<br />

carbon dioxide is <strong>of</strong>ten scarce in water. The PEP carboxylase<br />

helps them obtain more carbon dioxide than would<br />

rubisco acting alone.<br />

• CAM plants open their pores and absorb carbon dioxide<br />

from the air at night, when conditions are relatively cool<br />

and moist. They make it into acid and store the acid until<br />

dawn. Then they close their pores and use the acid as a<br />

source <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide from which the Calvin cycle<br />

can produce sugar during the day. This has the advantage<br />

<strong>of</strong> allowing the CAM plants to open their pores at night<br />

rather than during the day, but it has a cost: They have<br />

to store the acid in their tissues. Most CAM plants are<br />

succulents (such as cactuses, jade plants, and agaves). As<br />

with C4 photosynthesis, CAM is worth the cost in hot, dry<br />

climates (usually deserts) but not worth the cost in cool,<br />

moist climates.<br />

The fact that most C 4 plants are grasses (which did not<br />

become abundant until the middle <strong>of</strong> the Cenozoic era),<br />

and that C 4 has evolved several times, suggests that it is <strong>of</strong><br />

recent origin. CAM appears to also be <strong>of</strong> recent origin.<br />

Before oxygen gas was abundant in the atmosphere <strong>of</strong><br />

the Earth, ultraviolet radiation bombarded the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planet. This would probably have killed most life-forms at or<br />

near the surface <strong>of</strong> the ocean. Most scientists believe that the<br />

first life-forms evolved below the ocean surface, perhaps at<br />

deep sea vents (see origin <strong>of</strong> life). Oxygen gas produced by<br />

photosynthesis would have overcome the problem <strong>of</strong> ultraviolet<br />

radiation and allowed photosynthetic organisms to grow<br />

at or near the surface. The obvious problem is, what were the<br />

photosynthetic organisms doing when the only safe place for<br />

them to live was deep in the ocean? The great sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />

anoxic photosynthetic bacteria to light was mentioned above.<br />

In 2005 scientists announced the discovery that anoxic green<br />

sulfur bacteria could carry out photosynthesis over 200 feet<br />

(80 m) below the surface <strong>of</strong> the Black Sea, under conditions<br />

that appeared to human observers to be totally dark. Sensitive<br />

measurements indicated that the volcanic vents in this<br />

region produced light in the visible range, and that the bacteria<br />

could use this faint light for photosynthesis. These bacteria<br />

were also, unlike other green sulfur bacteria, not killed by<br />

oxygen gas. In two ways—their ability to use very faint light<br />

and their ability to tolerate oxygen—these bacteria may represent<br />

what the first photosynthetic cells were like.<br />

Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />

Bohannon, John. “Microbe may push photosynthesis into deep<br />

water.” Science 308 (2005): 1,855.<br />

Nasa Astrobiology Institute. “Terrestrial Powerhouses.” Available<br />

online. URL: http://www.nai.arc.nasa.gov/news_stories/news_<br />

detail.cfm?article=old/powerhouses.htm. Accessed May 1, 2005.<br />

Whitmarsh, John, and Govindjee. “The Photosynthetic Process.”<br />

Available online. URL: http://www.life.uiuc.edu/govindjee/paper/<br />

gov.html#32. Accessed May 1, 2005.<br />

Piltdown man Piltdown man was a fraudulent fossil<br />

human that was planted in a gravel quarry in England in<br />

1911. The perpetrator/s <strong>of</strong> the hoax, which was revealed in<br />

1953, were never definitely identified, although the person<br />

who had greatest opportunity was Charles Dawson, a lawyer<br />

and amateur archaeologist who was involved in other fraudulent<br />

schemes. At that time, the only other fossil humans,<br />

aside from those that were clearly in the modern human species<br />

(see Cro-Magnon), were the Neandertals in mainland<br />

Europe and Java man (see Homo erectus; Dubois,<br />

Eugène). Throughout the early period <strong>of</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> human<br />

evolution, the question persisted: Which came first, upright<br />

posture or a large brain? The Neandertal and Java man skeletons<br />

suggested that apelike features <strong>of</strong> the skull persisted even<br />

after erect posture had evolved in the human lineage. Piltdown<br />

man was, for four decades, accepted as evidence that<br />

brain expansion may have preceded the evolution <strong>of</strong> the rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> the skeleton. Also, this ancient expansion <strong>of</strong> brain capacity<br />

just happened to occur in what is now England, which at the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the 20th century still considered itself the most<br />

intellectually advanced nation in the world.<br />

In 1911 Dawson visited the Piltdown gravel quarry near<br />

his home and asked the quarrymen to be on the watch for fos-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!