Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Piltdown man<br />
found in slightly different forms (see convergence). All<br />
<strong>of</strong> the enzymes involved in the first cycle (which produces<br />
the acid) are used in other parts <strong>of</strong> the cell for other purposes.<br />
The enzyme that captures the carbon dioxide, PEP<br />
carboxylase, produces organic acids in all the cells <strong>of</strong> the<br />
plant. Therefore the evolution <strong>of</strong> C 4 photosynthesis did not<br />
require the origin <strong>of</strong> new chemical reactions but borrowed<br />
them from other parts <strong>of</strong> the cell.<br />
• CAM plants (which have Crassulacean Acid Metabolism)<br />
also have the same two carbon fixation cycles, but the first<br />
one (acid production) occurs at night, and the second one<br />
(the Calvin cycle) occurs in the daytime. Like C 4 photosynthesis,<br />
CAM appears to have evolved more than once, for<br />
it is found in some species in several plant families (such<br />
as the cactus, jade plant, and lily families) but not in their<br />
common ancestors.<br />
Both C4 and CAM pathways are adaptations to hot, dry<br />
conditions:<br />
• Rubisco, the enzyme that fixes carbon dioxide in the Calvin<br />
cycle, is inhibited by oxygen. However, PEP carboxylase,<br />
the enzyme that fixes carbon dioxide in the first cycle<br />
<strong>of</strong> C4 photosynthesis, is not inhibited by oxygen. On a hot<br />
dry day, leaves <strong>of</strong>ten close their pores (stomata) to prevent<br />
excessive water loss. This causes a buildup <strong>of</strong> oxygen inside<br />
the leaves. This oxygen buildup causes the photosynthesis<br />
<strong>of</strong> C3 plants to slow down but does not inhibit the photosynthesis<br />
<strong>of</strong> C4 plants. Therefore, in hot dry climates, C4 plants can continue making food under conditions that<br />
would cause C3 plants to stop making food. Because the<br />
carbon fixation in C4 plants has two cycles rather than just<br />
one, it is more expensive; but in hot dry climates the extra<br />
expense is worth the cost. However, in cool moist climates,<br />
the expense is not worth the cost. Therefore C4 plants are<br />
relatively more common in hot dry climates (usually grasslands)<br />
and C3 plants in cool, moist climates. C4 photosynthesis<br />
has also evolved in some aquatic plants, because<br />
carbon dioxide is <strong>of</strong>ten scarce in water. The PEP carboxylase<br />
helps them obtain more carbon dioxide than would<br />
rubisco acting alone.<br />
• CAM plants open their pores and absorb carbon dioxide<br />
from the air at night, when conditions are relatively cool<br />
and moist. They make it into acid and store the acid until<br />
dawn. Then they close their pores and use the acid as a<br />
source <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide from which the Calvin cycle<br />
can produce sugar during the day. This has the advantage<br />
<strong>of</strong> allowing the CAM plants to open their pores at night<br />
rather than during the day, but it has a cost: They have<br />
to store the acid in their tissues. Most CAM plants are<br />
succulents (such as cactuses, jade plants, and agaves). As<br />
with C4 photosynthesis, CAM is worth the cost in hot, dry<br />
climates (usually deserts) but not worth the cost in cool,<br />
moist climates.<br />
The fact that most C 4 plants are grasses (which did not<br />
become abundant until the middle <strong>of</strong> the Cenozoic era),<br />
and that C 4 has evolved several times, suggests that it is <strong>of</strong><br />
recent origin. CAM appears to also be <strong>of</strong> recent origin.<br />
Before oxygen gas was abundant in the atmosphere <strong>of</strong><br />
the Earth, ultraviolet radiation bombarded the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />
planet. This would probably have killed most life-forms at or<br />
near the surface <strong>of</strong> the ocean. Most scientists believe that the<br />
first life-forms evolved below the ocean surface, perhaps at<br />
deep sea vents (see origin <strong>of</strong> life). Oxygen gas produced by<br />
photosynthesis would have overcome the problem <strong>of</strong> ultraviolet<br />
radiation and allowed photosynthetic organisms to grow<br />
at or near the surface. The obvious problem is, what were the<br />
photosynthetic organisms doing when the only safe place for<br />
them to live was deep in the ocean? The great sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />
anoxic photosynthetic bacteria to light was mentioned above.<br />
In 2005 scientists announced the discovery that anoxic green<br />
sulfur bacteria could carry out photosynthesis over 200 feet<br />
(80 m) below the surface <strong>of</strong> the Black Sea, under conditions<br />
that appeared to human observers to be totally dark. Sensitive<br />
measurements indicated that the volcanic vents in this<br />
region produced light in the visible range, and that the bacteria<br />
could use this faint light for photosynthesis. These bacteria<br />
were also, unlike other green sulfur bacteria, not killed by<br />
oxygen gas. In two ways—their ability to use very faint light<br />
and their ability to tolerate oxygen—these bacteria may represent<br />
what the first photosynthetic cells were like.<br />
Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />
Bohannon, John. “Microbe may push photosynthesis into deep<br />
water.” Science 308 (2005): 1,855.<br />
Nasa Astrobiology Institute. “Terrestrial Powerhouses.” Available<br />
online. URL: http://www.nai.arc.nasa.gov/news_stories/news_<br />
detail.cfm?article=old/powerhouses.htm. Accessed May 1, 2005.<br />
Whitmarsh, John, and Govindjee. “The Photosynthetic Process.”<br />
Available online. URL: http://www.life.uiuc.edu/govindjee/paper/<br />
gov.html#32. Accessed May 1, 2005.<br />
Piltdown man Piltdown man was a fraudulent fossil<br />
human that was planted in a gravel quarry in England in<br />
1911. The perpetrator/s <strong>of</strong> the hoax, which was revealed in<br />
1953, were never definitely identified, although the person<br />
who had greatest opportunity was Charles Dawson, a lawyer<br />
and amateur archaeologist who was involved in other fraudulent<br />
schemes. At that time, the only other fossil humans,<br />
aside from those that were clearly in the modern human species<br />
(see Cro-Magnon), were the Neandertals in mainland<br />
Europe and Java man (see Homo erectus; Dubois,<br />
Eugène). Throughout the early period <strong>of</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> human<br />
evolution, the question persisted: Which came first, upright<br />
posture or a large brain? The Neandertal and Java man skeletons<br />
suggested that apelike features <strong>of</strong> the skull persisted even<br />
after erect posture had evolved in the human lineage. Piltdown<br />
man was, for four decades, accepted as evidence that<br />
brain expansion may have preceded the evolution <strong>of</strong> the rest<br />
<strong>of</strong> the skeleton. Also, this ancient expansion <strong>of</strong> brain capacity<br />
just happened to occur in what is now England, which at the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> the 20th century still considered itself the most<br />
intellectually advanced nation in the world.<br />
In 1911 Dawson visited the Piltdown gravel quarry near<br />
his home and asked the quarrymen to be on the watch for fos-