24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

duplication, gene<br />

prominent brow ridges that were characteristic <strong>of</strong> apes but<br />

not <strong>of</strong> humans (except for Neandertals). The estimated size<br />

<strong>of</strong> the brain was larger than that <strong>of</strong> any ape and smaller than<br />

the range <strong>of</strong> modern humans.<br />

Two years later, he found a femur (upper leg bone). The<br />

fact that the femur was found only 15 meters away from<br />

the tooth and skullcap, and from the same layer, suggested<br />

to Dubois that they were from the same species, perhaps the<br />

same individual. The femur bent inward, which is a characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> animals that walk upright. The length <strong>of</strong> the femur,<br />

moreover, suggested that this species had relatively long<br />

legs and short arms, which characterizes humans, not apes.<br />

Dubois was convinced that he had found the remains <strong>of</strong> a<br />

species that was intermediate between humans and apes and<br />

walked erect: In the article in which he announced his discoveries,<br />

he called it Anthropopithecus erectus, the humanape<br />

that walked upright. Later he changed the genus name to<br />

Pithecanthropus, which was the name that the German evolutionist<br />

Haeckel (see Haeckel, Ernst) had used to describe<br />

the hypothetical ape-man that he was sure had to have<br />

existed. For the next several decades, scientific articles and<br />

books referred to Java man as Pithecanthropus erectus. After<br />

anthropologists determined that Java man was very similar to<br />

Peking man and that it belonged in the human genus, both<br />

were subsumed into the species Homo erectus.<br />

While not every scientist accepted Dubois’s conclusions,<br />

many did. Dubois himself began to doubt that the specimens<br />

really were an intermediate between apes and humans. The<br />

more he studied the Southeast Asian gibbon, the more he came<br />

to believe that Java man was just a large gibbon. In his later<br />

years, Dubois kept the Java man specimens hidden underneath<br />

the floorboards <strong>of</strong> his house. This reduced, but did not eliminate,<br />

the credibility <strong>of</strong> his discoveries. To this day creationists<br />

claim that Homo erectus fossils can be ignored because their<br />

discoverer lost confidence in them (see creationism). Many<br />

other specimens <strong>of</strong> Homo erectus, and <strong>of</strong> related species such<br />

as Homo ergaster, have been found that leave no doubt<br />

about either the existence or the characteristics <strong>of</strong> this hominin<br />

species. Dubois died December 16, 1940.<br />

Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />

Lewin, Roger, Carl Swisher, and Garniss H. Curtis. Java Man: How<br />

Two Geologists’ Discoveries Changed Our Understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Evolution</strong>ary Path to Modern Humans. New York: Scribners,<br />

2000.<br />

Shipman, Pat. The Man Who Found the Missing Link: Eugene<br />

Dubois and His Lifelong Quest to Prove Darwin Right. Cambridge,<br />

Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002.<br />

duplication, gene See DNA (raw material <strong>of</strong> evolution).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!