Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
nerve cells—the very specialization that stem, germ, and cancer<br />
cells do not have. Second, processes that promote cell immortality<br />
can easily slip into a destructive mode. Telomerase may stimulate<br />
cancer. The more active form <strong>of</strong> superoxide dismutase causes ALS<br />
(amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig’s disease) in humans<br />
when it functions in nerve cells. As the years roll by, telomeres<br />
shorten, oxidative damage occurs, and the molecular armamentarium<br />
<strong>of</strong> the cells appears unable to stop these processes from<br />
eventually killing an individual.<br />
2. Inevitability <strong>of</strong> cancer. Among the many genes in a eukaryotic<br />
cell are tumor-suppressor genes. These genes become active<br />
when a cell experiences a potentially carcinogenic mutation. These<br />
TSGs cause the mutated cell to commit biochemical suicide, thereby<br />
preventing the cell from causing cancer. Benzopyrene in cigarette<br />
smoke mutates the p53 TSG in lung cells, making these cells vulnerable<br />
to cancer. This is the principal reason that smoking causes lung<br />
cancer. Mutations in the p53 gene are also responsible for cancers<br />
in response to ultraviolet light and to certain fungal toxins. There are<br />
other TSGs, which protect cells from other kinds <strong>of</strong> cancer.<br />
Because humans are diploid organisms (see mendelian genetics),<br />
each cell has two copies <strong>of</strong> each TSG. If a mutation occurs in<br />
one <strong>of</strong> these copies in a cell, the other can serve as a backup in<br />
that cell. Eventually both will mutate, as the body is bombarded by<br />
radiation and exposed to carcinogenic chemicals (including many<br />
that are natural components <strong>of</strong> food or the environment). Cancer<br />
therefore appears to be inevitable after a long enough period <strong>of</strong><br />
time. People who inherit mutated TSGs from their parents have an<br />
increased risk <strong>of</strong> cancer. If a person inherits one copy <strong>of</strong> a mutated<br />
TSG, cancer can result quickly in a cell because there is no functional<br />
backup TSG. This is what happens in women who inherit one<br />
mutated copy <strong>of</strong> the BRCA1 gene, a TSG that protects them from<br />
breast cancer. These women are at greatly increased risk <strong>of</strong> breast<br />
cancer. As the years roll by, cells lose their tumor-suppressor genes<br />
and cancer results.<br />
3. Inevitability <strong>of</strong> mutations. Many other mutations accumulate<br />
in chromosomes, besides those in the tumor-suppressor genes.<br />
In time, the accumulation <strong>of</strong> mutations would ruin the genes. Mutations<br />
cannot be prevented.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the major causes <strong>of</strong> mutations is the very air that animals<br />
breathe! Among the results <strong>of</strong> oxidative stress, described<br />
above, is DNA mutation. Eventually, oxygen gas would create so<br />
many mutations that the genes would stop working. At the same<br />
time, oxygen is essential for most cells to release energy from food<br />
and put it to use. Oxygen gas is essential to all higher life-forms<br />
(anaerobic life-forms are all simple and slow), yet it would eventually<br />
kill all <strong>of</strong> these life-forms.<br />
Another major cause <strong>of</strong> mutations is radiation, especially<br />
ultraviolet radiation from the sun. The ozone layer shields the world<br />
from much, but not all, ultraviolet radiation. Sunlight is necessary<br />
for life, but this same sunlight would eventually kill all cells and<br />
cell lineages by creating mutations and ruining their genes. As the<br />
years roll by, mutations accumulate.<br />
Therefore, in a world <strong>of</strong> oxygen and ultraviolet radiation, it<br />
appears that no individual organism could live forever. Natural<br />
selection does get rid <strong>of</strong> many mutations that would otherwise build<br />
up through generations <strong>of</strong> exposure to oxygen and radiation. Mutations<br />
do accumulate in germline cells—and they are the source <strong>of</strong><br />
life history, evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
the genetic variation (see DNA [raw material <strong>of</strong> evolution]; mutations;<br />
population genetics) upon which natural selection acts.<br />
Aging and Death Are in the Body<br />
From ages 30 to 75, the average male human loses 44 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
his brain weight, 64 percent <strong>of</strong> his taste buds, and 44 percent <strong>of</strong> his<br />
lung capacity. The older man’s heart output is 30 percent lower, and<br />
his nerves 10 percent slower. His brain receives 20 percent less<br />
blood. During exercise, the older man absorbs 60 percent less oxygen<br />
into his blood. Just as cells accumulate molecular damage, so<br />
the organs accumulate damage due to wear and tear. Repair mechanisms<br />
exist but are imperfect.<br />
Aging Is the Product <strong>of</strong> Natural Selection<br />
The longer an organism lives, the more likely it is to meet its demise<br />
from factors unrelated to its own health. In the wild, it would be<br />
practically inconceivable for an animal to live a thousand years<br />
without experiencing an accident or disaster or cancer. Some<br />
plants live a long time but experience much damage during that<br />
time. Giant sequoia trees, many <strong>of</strong> them more than two millennia<br />
old, almost all show signs <strong>of</strong> fire damage. Even in an imaginary<br />
population <strong>of</strong> physically immortal animals, there would be very few<br />
extremely old ones. (The immortals <strong>of</strong> mythology avoided this problem<br />
by not being physical.) Natural selection would favor the ability<br />
<strong>of</strong> their bodies to repair themselves for at most a few decades. Any<br />
genes that especially promoted the repair <strong>of</strong> cells in very old individuals<br />
would confer little benefit, since there would be so few <strong>of</strong><br />
these individuals. Besides, repair mechanisms have costs and risks<br />
associated with them. Examples include:<br />
• The cells that have the greatest ability to regenerate are the<br />
very cells that have the greatest risk <strong>of</strong> cancer—which is, after<br />
all, simply cell division that has gone out <strong>of</strong> control. Examples<br />
include skin and intestinal cells.<br />
• The same physiological processes that protect younger individuals<br />
can accumulate and cause problems in older individuals.<br />
Urate molecules in the blood act as antioxidants, but they also<br />
accumulate in joints, causing gout.<br />
Early in the 20th century, evolutionary biologist J. B. S. Haldane<br />
(see haldane, J. b. s.) pointed out that natural selection cannot<br />
eliminate mutations that are deleterious to individuals who have<br />
passed their reproductive life span. Biologists Peter Medawar and<br />
George Williams expanded this concept. Pleiotropic genes have<br />
more than one effect. If the effect <strong>of</strong> a gene on young individuals is<br />
good but the effect on older individuals is bad, natural selection will<br />
actually favor the gene, despite its deleterious effects on older individuals.<br />
Natural selection has favored a long, but not vast, period <strong>of</strong><br />
post-reproductive life in humans (see life history, evolution <strong>of</strong>).<br />
Natural selection favors characteristics that promote successful<br />
reproduction, even at the expense <strong>of</strong> individual survival. This<br />
is why evolutionary fitness is defined as successful reproduction.<br />
Organisms that devote the most effort and resources to reproduction<br />
when they are young, even if they “wear themselves out” in doing<br />
so, can produce more <strong>of</strong>fspring than can organisms that reproduce<br />
fewer <strong>of</strong>fspring over a longer period <strong>of</strong> time. This has been confirmed<br />
(continues)