24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gaia hypothesis The Gaia hypothesis claims that organisms<br />

have transformed the entire Earth and maintain it in a<br />

state very different than it would have without organisms.<br />

“Gaia” is the name <strong>of</strong> an ancient Greek Earth goddess and<br />

is intended by the scientists who defend the hypothesis as<br />

an image, not referring to the Earth as a literal organism or<br />

person. Biologist Lewis Thomas proposed the concept that<br />

the Earth was like a cell in his 1984 book Lives <strong>of</strong> a Cell.<br />

However, Thomas’s imagery resulted in no program <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

investigation. The scientific predictions based upon the<br />

Gaia hypothesis began with the work <strong>of</strong> atmospheric scientist<br />

James Lovelock. Its principal proponent within the world <strong>of</strong><br />

biological and evolutionary science is evolutionary biologist<br />

Lynn Margulis (see Margulis, Lynn).<br />

The Gaia hypothesis is sometimes worded as “The Earth<br />

is alive,” but this is not correct. The scientists who defend the<br />

Gaia hypothesis claim not that the Earth is an organism but<br />

that the atmosphere and water <strong>of</strong> the Earth are a nonliving<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the Earth’s living system <strong>of</strong> interacting organisms the<br />

same way that a shell is a nonliving part <strong>of</strong> a mollusk. The<br />

Gaia hypothesis states that organisms transform the Earth in<br />

a way that has resulted in a regulation <strong>of</strong> the temperature and<br />

chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the Earth.<br />

Biological activities <strong>of</strong> organisms have caused the Earth<br />

to be very different from other planets and maintain it in a<br />

chemically unstable condition. Thus, even without visiting a<br />

distant planet, observers should be able to determine whether<br />

life exists on the planet. If all <strong>of</strong> its atmospheric components<br />

(which can be studied by analyzing the light that they reflect)<br />

are in equilibrium, the planet is either lifeless or nearly so. Life<br />

creates chemical and physical disequilibrium which can be visible<br />

from millions <strong>of</strong> miles away. This was the basis on which<br />

James Lovelock predicted that no life would be found on<br />

Mars, a prediction that is either entirely or very nearly accurate<br />

(see Mars, life on). Consider the following examples.<br />

Carbon dioxide. The other Earth-like planets (Venus and<br />

Mars) have atmospheres with tremendous amounts <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />

G<br />

dioxide. In contrast, the Earth’s atmosphere consists <strong>of</strong> less<br />

than 0.04 percent carbon dioxide. The primordial Earth, during<br />

the Hadean era (see Precambrian time), also had a high<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide, although sediments deposited<br />

at that time indicate that the Earth’s atmosphere never<br />

had as much carbon dioxide as Venus and Mars now have.<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis (see photosynthesis, evolution<br />

<strong>of</strong>), carried out by many bacteria during the Archaean<br />

era, reduced the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration<br />

by at least two orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude. Where did the carbon<br />

dioxide go? The bacteria made it into organic material,<br />

whether living material (the bacteria themselves) or deposits<br />

<strong>of</strong> dead material. Eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms, such<br />

as plants, continued this process once they evolved.<br />

Oxygen. Photosynthetic bacteria, from which the chloroplasts<br />

<strong>of</strong> many protists and <strong>of</strong> green plants have evolved,<br />

also filled the Earth’s atmosphere with huge amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

oxygen gas. The buildup <strong>of</strong> oxygen made the sky turn blue.<br />

Through most <strong>of</strong> the late Precambrian time, the Earth’s<br />

atmosphere had approximately the level <strong>of</strong> oxygen gas that<br />

it now has. The huge amount <strong>of</strong> oxygen gas in the air is perhaps<br />

the most strikingly unstable result <strong>of</strong> biological activities.<br />

Oxygen atoms attract electrons from many other kinds<br />

<strong>of</strong> atoms and are therefore very reactive. All <strong>of</strong> the oxygen<br />

gas in the air would react with other molecules (such as<br />

nitrogen gas, which is the principal component <strong>of</strong> the atmosphere;<br />

the ferrous form <strong>of</strong> iron; and with organic molecules)<br />

and disappear, if it were not continually replenished by photosynthesis.<br />

Other atmospheric components. Methane (CH 4; the<br />

principal form <strong>of</strong> natural gas) is continually produced by<br />

organisms, mostly by bacteria that live in anaerobic conditions<br />

(for example, mud or animal intestines, away from the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> oxygen). While there is not much methane in the<br />

atmosphere, the little that is there quickly reacts with oxygen<br />

to form carbon dioxide. Its continued presence results from<br />

bacterial metabolism. The atmosphere also has nitrogen (N 2),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!