Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
0 Mars, life on<br />
• The spacecraft Opportunity and the rovers that it delivered<br />
to the Martian surface sent back evidence in 2004 that the<br />
chemistry and structure <strong>of</strong> some Martian rocks probably<br />
resulted from percolation by water in the distant past.<br />
• Satellite photographs <strong>of</strong> Martian gullies, published in 2006,<br />
showed that over a four-year time span, a flow <strong>of</strong> liquid<br />
water had filled a gully with ice and mineral deposits.<br />
What happened to the water on Mars? Being a smaller<br />
planet than Earth, Mars cooled down more quickly from<br />
its initially molten condition. With less gravitation, it was<br />
unable to hold onto a significant atmosphere. The Martian<br />
atmosphere is about one percent as dense as Earth’s. Mars<br />
apparently no longer has liquid magma circulating in its interior;<br />
therefore, it has no magnetic field that can deflect solar<br />
particles. The solar particles have scoured away much <strong>of</strong> the<br />
atmosphere, including the water vapor.<br />
In 1996 scientists from NASA and several universities<br />
announced direct evidence that there may once have been life<br />
on Mars. They obtained the evidence from one <strong>of</strong> more than<br />
50 meteorites that apparently came from Mars: a rock called<br />
ALH84001, so named because it was specimen number 1<br />
found in 1984 in the Allen Hills <strong>of</strong> Antarctica. Meteorites<br />
from Mars are the next best thing to actually bringing rocks<br />
back from Mars.<br />
How could scientists conclude that the meteorite came<br />
from Mars?<br />
• Scientists had to confirm that the rock really was a meteorite.<br />
It was found on top <strong>of</strong> an ice field in Antarctica, far<br />
from rock outcrops. Scientists therefore concluded that the<br />
This photograph taken in 00 by the Mars Global Surveyor shows gullies<br />
coming from the sides <strong>of</strong> an impact crater. These gullies were most likely<br />
formed by melting water, either from groundwater or from snow. The<br />
scale bar is about 0 feet ( 00 m). (Courtesy <strong>of</strong> NASA)<br />
rocks at this location were meteorites. At the location where<br />
the rocks were found, the ice slowly rises and the water<br />
molecules enter the atmosphere, leaving the meteorites<br />
behind. Therefore, over thousands <strong>of</strong> years, meteorites have<br />
accumulated at this location in relatively large numbers.<br />
• Scientists had to confirm that the meteorite really came from<br />
Mars. Most meteorites are small asteroids (see asteroids<br />
and comets). Some meteorites are volcanic in origin, which<br />
means they must have come from a planet. ALH84001 is <strong>of</strong><br />
volcanic origin. Could it have come from a volcano on the<br />
Earth? An analysis <strong>of</strong> gas bubbles trapped within the rocks<br />
closely matched the atmosphere <strong>of</strong> Mars. The rocks were<br />
therefore identified as meteorites from Mars.<br />
How could volcanic rocks from Mars have reached the<br />
Earth? The most likely explanation is that a large meteoric<br />
impact on Mars about 15 million years ago blasted some<br />
volcanic rocks up into space. Some <strong>of</strong> these volcanic rocks<br />
crossed the orbit <strong>of</strong> the Earth and became meteorites. The<br />
ALH84001 meteorite fell to the Earth about 13,000 years<br />
ago.<br />
What evidence <strong>of</strong> life can be found in these meteorites?<br />
NASA scientists presented two types <strong>of</strong> evidence: chemical<br />
and fossil.<br />
Chemical evidence. ALH84001 contains organic compounds<br />
known as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),<br />
similar to some <strong>of</strong> the compounds found in petroleum.<br />
Although terrestrial PAHs are usually produced by biological<br />
activity (as in petroleum), they are also found in interstellar<br />
space (see origin <strong>of</strong> life).<br />
Is there any direct evidence that the PAHs in the Martian<br />
meteorite were formed by biological activity? The PAHs were<br />
found closely associated with carbonates in the meteorite.<br />
Carbonates (for example, in limestone and the shells <strong>of</strong> invertebrates)<br />
are <strong>of</strong>ten produced by biological processes—but can<br />
also be produced inorganically as dissolved CO2 reacts with<br />
calcium in water. The carbonates have been dated to be 3.6<br />
billion years old, younger than the 4.5-billion-year-old rock<br />
itself. The carbonates, and PAHs, may have entered the rock<br />
after it formed, perhaps from prolonged soaking in water that<br />
contained microbes.<br />
The scientists considered the possibility that the PAHs<br />
could be contaminants from petroleum fumes in the Earth’s<br />
polluted atmosphere. But, they concluded, if this were the<br />
case, there would be more PAHs on the outside than the<br />
inside <strong>of</strong> the meteorite. Since the outside <strong>of</strong> the meteorite had<br />
less PAH than did the inside, the scientists concluded that the<br />
PAHs could not have come from a relatively brief exposure<br />
to atmospheric PAHs on earth.<br />
Fossil evidence. Scanning electron micrographs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
meteorite revealed structures that look like microorganisms<br />
(see photo on page 261). Although it is possible that they are<br />
crystal-like structures formed under lifeless conditions, they<br />
resembled Earth’s microorganisms so much that some observers<br />
could not resist believing them to be the fossils <strong>of</strong> once<br />
living cells.<br />
Since the initial announcement <strong>of</strong> the possible Martian<br />
microbes, enthusiasm for the discovery has diminished. The