Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
example <strong>of</strong> frequency-dependent selection is that <strong>of</strong> sex<br />
ratios (see sex, evolution <strong>of</strong>). If males are rare in a population,<br />
the average male will leave more <strong>of</strong>fspring than the<br />
average female. Conversely, rare females will leave more<br />
<strong>of</strong>fspring, on the average, than common males. Whichever<br />
sex is rare enjoys greater reproductive success. Frequencydependent<br />
selection is considered to be the main process by<br />
which most animal populations maintain an equal mix <strong>of</strong><br />
males and females.<br />
Limitations <strong>of</strong> Natural Selection<br />
Natural selection is not all-powerful. Below are examples <strong>of</strong><br />
limitations upon the power <strong>of</strong> natural selection:<br />
• Physical constraints. Natural selection cannot cause the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> characteristics that violate the laws <strong>of</strong> physics<br />
and chemistry. For example, natural selection cannot<br />
produce a large animal with skinny legs (see allometry).<br />
Also, the tallest trees in the world are about 350 feet<br />
(about 70 m) tall. Trees much taller than this are not possible,<br />
because there is a maximum height to which wood can<br />
conduct water, and the tallest redwoods may be very close<br />
to this maximum height. Large animals with wheels cannot<br />
evolve, for the wheel could not receive nutrition from the<br />
rest <strong>of</strong> the body through the axle.<br />
• Phyletic constraints. Once an evolutionary lineage has<br />
adopted a certain adaptation, this adaptation itself puts<br />
constraints on evolutionary change. It is not possible for<br />
an animal to have an exoskeleton and to be large. Once<br />
arthropods evolved exoskeletons (see invertebrates, evolution<br />
<strong>of</strong>), large size could no longer evolve in their lineage.<br />
• Absence <strong>of</strong> genetic variation. Natural selection can only<br />
choose from among the genetic characteristics that are<br />
available in the population. These characteristics arise by<br />
chance mutations.<br />
• Linkage <strong>of</strong> traits. Natural selection may be unable to select<br />
traits separately, if they are linked either on the same chromosome<br />
(as linkage groups; Mendelian genetics) or in<br />
development. In flowers, petal size and stamen size share<br />
developmental events, and natural selection cannot cause<br />
one to become bigger or smaller without the other.<br />
• Plasticity and dispersal. Organisms may respond to changes<br />
in environmental conditions by plasticity or acclimation,<br />
or by dispersal to a new location. These are ways in which<br />
individual organisms can avoid becoming the victims <strong>of</strong><br />
natural selection.<br />
• Post-reproductive individuals. Natural selection cannot<br />
eliminate harmful mutations that have their effect when all<br />
or most <strong>of</strong> the organism’s reproduction has been completed<br />
(see life history, evolution <strong>of</strong>). This is sometimes called<br />
the “kingpin principle,” based on a story about automobile<br />
manufacturer Henry Ford. He had his engineers study old<br />
Ford cars and find which part <strong>of</strong> the old cars was in the<br />
best condition. They reported that the kingpins were just<br />
like new. Ford told his factory managers to stop wasting<br />
their time making such good kingpins. There was no need<br />
for kingpins to last forever in a car that did not. Similarly,<br />
natural selection<br />
in organisms, there is no advantage for genes that promote<br />
the health and vigor <strong>of</strong> post-reproductive individuals.<br />
• The future. Natural selection cannot anticipate the future<br />
and prepare for it.<br />
• Group selection. Natural selection cannot favor characteristics<br />
that benefit the group but reduce the fitness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
individual that possesses them. Some adaptations result<br />
in harm for the individual (for example, worker bees that<br />
die after stinging a victim, and a mother spider that dies<br />
when her spiderlings eat her) but these are compensated<br />
by an increase in inclusive fitness (see altruism). When<br />
pathogens infect a host, natural selection may favor those<br />
selfish lineages <strong>of</strong> pathogens that reproduce most rapidly,<br />
even if the host dies as a result. Natural selection may<br />
work against such selfish pathogens if the death <strong>of</strong> the host<br />
results in the death <strong>of</strong> the entire pathogen population (see<br />
group selection) or if the illness <strong>of</strong> the host causes other<br />
hosts to stay away from the sick individual, thus preventing<br />
the dispersal <strong>of</strong> any pathogens <strong>of</strong> that population to new<br />
hosts (see evolutionary medicine). But natural selection<br />
cannot result in individuals sacrificing their own fitness<br />
within a population.<br />
Natural Selection Observed in Nature<br />
Below are just a few examples <strong>of</strong> natural selection that have<br />
been observed in nature.<br />
Stabilizing selection. <strong>Evolution</strong>ary biologists Arthur Weis<br />
and Warren Abrahamson studied insects that lay their eggs<br />
inside <strong>of</strong> plant stems. The grub releases a compound that<br />
causes the stem to produce a round swelling called a gall. The<br />
grub can develop, well fed, inside this gall. There are dangers<br />
from predators, however. Gall wasps can recognize galls and<br />
pierce their ovipositors into the gall, laying their eggs on the<br />
grub, and the wasp larvae eat the grub. Birds can also recognize<br />
galls and tear them open, to eat the protein-rich grub.<br />
Gall wasps prefer smaller galls; wasp parasitism therefore<br />
selects for larger galls. Birds prefer larger galls; bird predation<br />
therefore selects for smaller galls. The result is what looks<br />
like stabilizing selection for medium-sized galls but is actually<br />
a compromise <strong>of</strong> two processes <strong>of</strong> directional selection.<br />
Directional selection. Soapberry bugs (Jadera haematoloma)<br />
pierce fruits <strong>of</strong> certain plants with their long beaks.<br />
They are native to the keys <strong>of</strong> Florida, where they obtained<br />
their food from native balloon vines. After 1925, landscapers<br />
introduced the golden rain tree, an Asian relative <strong>of</strong> the balloon<br />
vine but with smaller fruits, into central Florida. Soapberry<br />
bugs began to use the new trees as a food source. In<br />
central Florida, natural selection favored bugs with shorter<br />
beaks. Over the next few decades, the central Florida bug<br />
populations evolved shorter beaks, while the bugs in the keys<br />
retained their long beaks. <strong>Evolution</strong>ary scientists Scott Carroll<br />
and Christin Boyd documented this change by examining<br />
bug collections that had been made before and after the<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> golden rain trees to central Florida.<br />
Diversifying selection. In populations <strong>of</strong> African blackbellied<br />
seedcrackers (a type <strong>of</strong> bird), individuals have either<br />
large or small beaks. These two beak sizes correspond to two