24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Two different hypothetical Bateman gradients. The graph on the top<br />

represents the situation in most animal species, in which males provide<br />

little care for the <strong>of</strong>fspring, and can afford to produce many <strong>of</strong>fspring. Males<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten have no mates or <strong>of</strong>fspring, but when they do, increasing the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> mates increases reproductive success. Females nearly always have<br />

<strong>of</strong>fspring, but increasing the number <strong>of</strong> mates does not help to increase the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspring very much. The situation is reversed in the graph on the<br />

bottom, which represents the situation in broad-nosed pipefish, in which<br />

the males care for the <strong>of</strong>fspring.<br />

Males are <strong>of</strong>ten violent toward <strong>of</strong>fspring, though usually not<br />

toward their own. Male lions will <strong>of</strong>ten kill the cubs <strong>of</strong> a<br />

female he has just acquired. If the female expended time and<br />

resources nurturing the cubs, this would reduce her ability to<br />

nurture his <strong>of</strong>fspring. One-third <strong>of</strong> all deaths <strong>of</strong> infant gorillas<br />

are caused by a new dominant male killing them. Even though<br />

infanticide is much less common among humans than gorillas<br />

or lions, men tend to show less care toward stepchildren than<br />

toward their own children. According to behavioral scientists<br />

Martin Daly and Margo Wilson, “the truth about Cinderella”<br />

is that there is an evolutionary reason why stepchildren receive<br />

less care than biological children.<br />

Reproductive systems <strong>of</strong> most animals can be roughly<br />

classified into (1) monogamy, where one male and one female<br />

are mated for life or at least for a long time; (2) polygamy,<br />

which includes (2a) animal societies that have a dominant<br />

reproductive individual and (2b) promiscuity, where individuals<br />

mate with other individuals without forming even<br />

temporary pair bonds. Animal reproductive systems form a<br />

continuum among these categories:<br />

Monogamy. Among the explanations that have been<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered for monogamy are:<br />

• Expensive <strong>of</strong>fspring. Monogamy is advantageous only<br />

when neither the male nor the female could obtain greater<br />

reproductive success by finding more mates. This may<br />

happen when the <strong>of</strong>fspring are expensive and require<br />

considerable care during upbringing, as in humans and<br />

some birds. Human <strong>of</strong>fspring are notoriously expensive<br />

to produce, vulnerable at birth and during infancy, and<br />

dependent upon long years <strong>of</strong> training, particularly for<br />

social interactions. Social interactions may have been<br />

the primary stimulus for the evolution <strong>of</strong> language and<br />

<strong>of</strong> large brains (see intelligence, evolution <strong>of</strong>; language,<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong>). It would be uncommon without<br />

organized society or extended family structures for a single<br />

mother to raise children by herself, and even then it is<br />

extremely difficult.<br />

• Certainty <strong>of</strong> paternity. Within a monogamous couple, the<br />

male can be certain that he is the father. In many animal<br />

species, such as lions, the male will kill their mate’s <strong>of</strong>fspring<br />

if these <strong>of</strong>fspring were sired by other males. This<br />

may be in the interest <strong>of</strong> the male, but not <strong>of</strong> the female.<br />

Monogamy might help to prevent infanticide.<br />

Monogamy is an example <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the behavior patterns<br />

that humans call “virtues” and that turn out to provide an<br />

evolutionary advantage. Lifelong and strict monogamy, however,<br />

does not yield to this simple evolutionary explanation. In<br />

Monogamous Animal Species<br />

reproductive systems<br />

Category Scientific name Common name<br />

Invertebrates Lysiosquilla sulcata Mantis shrimp<br />

Reticulitermes flavipes Termite<br />

Birds Coragyps atratus Black vulture<br />

Corvus monedula Jackdaw<br />

Pygoscelis antarctica Chinstrap penguin<br />

Aceros undulatus Wreathed hornbills<br />

Cygnus columbianus<br />

bewickii<br />

Bewick’s swan<br />

Mammals Modoqua kirkii Kirk’s dik-dik<br />

(antelope)<br />

Peromyscus californicus California mouse<br />

Microtus ochrogaster Prairie vole<br />

Phodopus campbelli Djungarian hamster<br />

Hystrix indica Indian crested<br />

porcupine

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!