24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lascaux caves<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the original linguistic diversity persisted into<br />

historic times. Etruscan was apparently a language unrelated<br />

to any other, although the Roman eradication <strong>of</strong> Etruscan<br />

culture was so thorough that little evidence remains. A small<br />

enclave <strong>of</strong> Basque culture and language near the border <strong>of</strong><br />

France and Spain is unrelated to any other known language<br />

group.<br />

Another parallel between biological species and languages<br />

is extinction. Most <strong>of</strong> the original languages have<br />

become extinct, just as have most species. The universal use<br />

<strong>of</strong> English, and widespread use <strong>of</strong> other commercial languages<br />

such as Indonesian, has caused many <strong>of</strong> the younger<br />

generation to treat their ancestral languages more as curiosities<br />

than as identities. Deliberate cultural efforts are underway<br />

to keep many Native American languages alive; for example,<br />

the Tsalagi (Cherokee) tribal newspaper is mostly in English<br />

but <strong>of</strong>ten has a column or two in the Cherokee language and<br />

script. Similar efforts keep Welsh and Irish alive. There are<br />

very few (or perhaps no) people who speak only Cherokee,<br />

Welsh, or Irish. Such languages are the cultural equivalent <strong>of</strong><br />

endangered species in nature preserves. Manx Gaelic became<br />

extinct within the last century.<br />

Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />

Anderson, Stephen R. “A telling difference.” Natural History,<br />

November 2004, 38–43.<br />

Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca, et al. “Reconstruction <strong>of</strong> human evolution:<br />

Bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic<br />

data.” Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences USA 85<br />

(1988): 6,002–6,006.<br />

Christiansen, Marten H., and Simon Kirby, eds. Language <strong>Evolution</strong>.<br />

New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.<br />

Diamond, Jared M. “Bridges to human language.” Chap. 8 in The<br />

Third Chimpanzee: The <strong>Evolution</strong> and Future <strong>of</strong> the Human Animal.<br />

New York: HarperPerennial, 1992.<br />

Dunbar, Robin. Grooming, Gossip, and the <strong>Evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> Language.<br />

Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.<br />

Dunn, Michael, et al. “Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> ancient language history.” Science 309 (2005): 2,072–<br />

2,075.<br />

Laird, Charlton. The Miracle <strong>of</strong> Language. New York: Fawcett,<br />

1973.<br />

McCrone, John. The Ape That Spoke: Language and the <strong>Evolution</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> the Human Mind. New York: William Morrow, 1991.<br />

Miller, Ge<strong>of</strong>frey F. The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the<br />

<strong>Evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> Human Nature. New York: Doubleday, 2000.<br />

Olson, Steve. Mapping Human History: Discovering the Past through<br />

Our Genes. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.<br />

Pei, Mario. The Story <strong>of</strong> Language. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1949.<br />

Wade, Nicholas. “Among chimps and bonobos, the hand <strong>of</strong>ten does<br />

the talking.” New York Times, May 1, 2007, D3.<br />

Lascaux caves See Cro-Magnon.<br />

lateral gene transfer See horizontal gene transfer.<br />

Leakey, Louis S. B. (1903–1972) Kenyan Anthropologist<br />

Louis Seymour Bazett Leakey (see photo) had a tremendous<br />

impact on the scientific and popular understanding <strong>of</strong> human<br />

evolution. Born August 7, 1903, the son <strong>of</strong> English missionaries,<br />

Leakey grew up in Kenya. During his childhood he<br />

learned Kikuyu as fluently as English and was later initiated<br />

into the Kikuyu tribe. When he was 13, he discovered<br />

some stone tools and decided that he wanted to study the<br />

ancient people who had produced them. He went to Cambridge<br />

University, where he earned a degree in anthropology<br />

and archaeology in 1926. He conducted several expeditions<br />

in East Africa, which led to his Ph.D. in 1930. In 1936 he<br />

married Mary Nicol, a scientific illustrator, who would later<br />

make significant discoveries <strong>of</strong> her own (see Leakey, Mary).<br />

When Louis Leakey was unable to verify the location<br />

from which some <strong>of</strong> his fossils had been found, some anthropologists<br />

dismissed his claims, and his chance for an academic<br />

career in England were diminished. He and Mary returned<br />

to Kenya, where he later became a curator at what is now<br />

the Kenya National Museum. The position paid little but<br />

Louis Leakey examines a fossil fragment discovered by his son Richard<br />

at their base camp in Omo Valley, Ethiopia, in the late 0s. (Courtesy <strong>of</strong><br />

Kenneth Garrett, National Geographic Society)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!