24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

0 Bates, Henry Walter<br />

advantage. The cystic fibrosis gene is particularly common<br />

in populations <strong>of</strong> European origin. Scientists have also suggested<br />

that the gene that promotes osteoporosis (calcium loss<br />

from bones in older adults) may confer resistance to the bacteria<br />

that cause tuberculosis.<br />

The possibility has also been raised that blood type proteins<br />

have been selected by disease resistance. The human<br />

ABO blood groups are determined by a gene on chromosome<br />

9. The gene codes for proteins that are in the membranes <strong>of</strong><br />

red blood cells. Allele A differs from allele B by seven nucleotides.<br />

Three <strong>of</strong> these nucleotide differences are neutral in their<br />

effect, while the other four result in amino acid differences in<br />

the blood protein. This is enough to allow the immune system<br />

to distinguish between blood protein A and blood protein B.<br />

Allele O results from a deletion, which prevents the production<br />

<strong>of</strong> the blood protein. Each person has two alleles for this<br />

group <strong>of</strong> blood proteins:<br />

• A person who carries two A alleles, or an A and an O<br />

allele, will have blood type A, since their red blood cells<br />

carry protein A.<br />

• A person who carries two B alleles, or a B and an O allele,<br />

will have blood type B, since their red blood cells carry<br />

protein B.<br />

• A person who carries one A and one B allele will have<br />

blood type AB, since their blood cells have both proteins.<br />

• Blood type O results from the absence <strong>of</strong> these blood<br />

proteins.<br />

This has long been considered an example <strong>of</strong> neutral<br />

genetic variation since the differences in blood type proteins<br />

are not known to have any adverse health effects, and since<br />

no benefit <strong>of</strong> one blood type over another has been proven.<br />

Populations in most parts <strong>of</strong> the world consist <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

blood types. The only major pattern seems to be that blood<br />

type O is relatively more common in populations <strong>of</strong> Native<br />

Americans than in other populations. Research has suggested<br />

that people with blood type AB are resistant to the bacterial<br />

disease cholera, while people with blood type O are susceptible<br />

to it. Although the blood proteins are found mainly on<br />

red blood cell membranes, they are also secreted in saliva,<br />

where they might function in preventing cholera. On the<br />

other hand, people with blood type O are more resistant to<br />

malaria and syphilis than those with the A and/or B proteins.<br />

If this is the case, scientists would expect that natural selection<br />

would make blood type AB very common in populations<br />

that frequently encounter cholera. This has not proven to be<br />

the case, perhaps because cholera is a disease <strong>of</strong> relatively<br />

recent origin. It did not reach Europe until the 18th century,<br />

and it may not have existed in Asia (its place <strong>of</strong> origin)<br />

very many centuries before that. Scientists would also expect<br />

blood type O to be more common in regions with malaria<br />

and syphilis. However, Native Americans did not encounter<br />

malaria until it was brought from the Old World in the 16th<br />

century, and the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> the New World origin <strong>of</strong> syphilis<br />

is controversial.<br />

What looks like neutral variation in blood group proteins<br />

may very well be left over from the past history <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

selection for disease resistance. As geneticist and science<br />

writer Matt Ridley wrote, “In a sense the genome is a written<br />

record <strong>of</strong> our pathological past, a medical scripture for each<br />

people and race.” Whether or not this turns out to be the case<br />

with blood group proteins, it has certainly happened with<br />

sickle-cell anemia, which evolutionary scientists still consider<br />

the best example <strong>of</strong> a balanced polymorphism.<br />

Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />

Dean, A. M. “The molecular anatomy <strong>of</strong> an ancient adaptive event.”<br />

American Scientist 86 (1998): 26–37.<br />

Pier, G. B., et al. “Salmonella typhi uses CTFR to enter intestinal epithelial<br />

cells.” Nature 393 (1998): 79–82.<br />

Ridley, Matt. Genome: The Autobiography <strong>of</strong> a Species in 23 Chapters.<br />

New York: HarperCollins, 1999.<br />

Bates, Henry Walter (1825–1892) British Naturalist Born<br />

on February 8, 1825, Henry Walter Bates was a British naturalist<br />

who specialized in collecting and studying insects. Bates<br />

befriended another British naturalist (see Wallace, Alfred<br />

Russel). In 1848 Bates and Wallace traveled together to the<br />

Amazon rain forest <strong>of</strong> South America, where both <strong>of</strong> them<br />

extensively collected insects and other animals. Wallace<br />

returned to England and then traveled to Indonesia, but Bates<br />

remained in the Amazon rain forest for 14 years.<br />

While studying Amazonian insects, Bates discovered that<br />

certain nonpoisonous species <strong>of</strong> heliconid butterflies had wing<br />

coloration patterns that resembled those <strong>of</strong> poisonous heliconid<br />

butterfly species. Since Bates’s initial discovery, numerous<br />

other examples <strong>of</strong> mimicry have been found. This type <strong>of</strong><br />

mimicry is now called Batesian mimicry. Bates’s discovery <strong>of</strong><br />

mimicry contributed significantly to Charles Darwin’s work<br />

on evolution. Darwin cited Bates’s discovery in later editions<br />

<strong>of</strong> Origin <strong>of</strong> Species (see Darwin, Charles; origin <strong>of</strong> species<br />

[book]). Bates and Darwin both maintained that such<br />

mimicry could not have resulted from the use and disuse <strong>of</strong><br />

the structures involved (see Lamarckism) and must have<br />

resulted from natural selection.<br />

Bates returned to England in 1862. He published an<br />

account <strong>of</strong> his work in the rain forest, The Naturalist on the<br />

River Amazons, in 1863. Bates continued scientific research<br />

and was elected a fellow <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society in 1881. His<br />

studies contributed to an understanding <strong>of</strong> biodiversity and<br />

<strong>of</strong> evolution, particularly <strong>of</strong> coevolution. He died February<br />

16, 1892.<br />

Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />

Beddall, Barbara G. Wallace and Bates in the Tropics: An Introduction<br />

to the Theory <strong>of</strong> Natural Selection, Based on the Writings <strong>of</strong><br />

Alfred Russel Wallace and Henry Walter Bates. London: Macmillan,<br />

1969.<br />

Beagle, HMS See Darwin, Charles.<br />

behavior, evolution <strong>of</strong> Behavior is the activity that results<br />

from the voluntary nervous activity <strong>of</strong> animals. Activities that<br />

are caused by purely metabolic or hormonal events are not<br />

considered behavior. Plants grow toward light. They do so<br />

because a hormone diffuses from the growing tip, primarily

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!