Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
comes from the unfertilized egg, rather than from the sperm;<br />
the cytoplasmic factors showed a pattern <strong>of</strong> inheritance that<br />
was passed on solely through the maternal line. This indicated<br />
that there was DNA in the cytoplasm, not just in the<br />
nucleus (see DNA [raw material <strong>of</strong> evolution]), and she<br />
had an idea where that DNA was located.<br />
All independently living cells (and most viruses as well)<br />
have genetic information encoded in DNA. In contrast, organelles<br />
(specialized structures within the cell) generally do not<br />
have their own DNA; their production and operation are<br />
dictated by the DNA in the cell’s nucleus. Margulis wrote a<br />
paper in 1967 in which she proposed that chloroplasts and<br />
mitochondria had and used their own DNA (see photosynthesis,<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong>; respiration, evolution <strong>of</strong>). The<br />
DNA was there because these organelles are the evolutionary<br />
descendants <strong>of</strong> bacteria that had merged with ancestral<br />
eukaryotic cells (see eukaryotes, evolution <strong>of</strong>). The bacteria<br />
remained, without killing their host cells; and the host cell<br />
lineages evolved processes that accommodated and made use<br />
<strong>of</strong> the bacteria. The bacteria became symbionts. If chloroplasts<br />
and mitochondria were merely cell structures, one would not<br />
expect them to have their own DNA. The chloroplasts evolved<br />
from photosynthetic bacteria (<strong>of</strong>ten called blue-green algae;<br />
see bacteria, evolution <strong>of</strong>) while the mitochondria evolved<br />
from aerobic bacteria that consumed organic materials.<br />
These symbiotic events happened more than a billion<br />
years ago. Frequently in cells, segments <strong>of</strong> DNA can<br />
move from one location to another (see horizontal gene<br />
transfer). Many <strong>of</strong> the genes <strong>of</strong> the mitochondria and<br />
chloroplasts were transposed from the symbiotic bacteria to<br />
the nuclei <strong>of</strong> the host cells. The simplified symbionts were<br />
now incapable <strong>of</strong> surviving on their own, and they became<br />
the chloroplasts and mitochondria that are today found<br />
only in eukaryotic cells.<br />
Though not accepted by many scientists at first, Margulis’s<br />
proposal <strong>of</strong> symbiogenesis quickly advanced in the<br />
scientific community. As better chemical and microscopic<br />
techniques became available, convincing evidence <strong>of</strong> the bacterial<br />
origin <strong>of</strong> chloroplasts and mitochondria emerged. Chloroplasts<br />
and mitochondria:<br />
• have their own DNA, which resembles bacterial DNA more<br />
than it resembles the DNA <strong>of</strong> eukaryotic chromosomes.<br />
• have ribosomes, which are structures that use genetic information<br />
in DNA to produce proteins. As a result, mitochondria<br />
and chloroplasts produce some <strong>of</strong> their own proteins.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> an important photosynthetic enzyme called<br />
rubisco, part <strong>of</strong> the enzyme (the large subunit, rbcL) is<br />
produced by the chloroplasts while the small subunit is<br />
produced by the ribosomes out in the chloroplast, using<br />
information now found in the nucleus.<br />
• reproduce themselves, rather than being constructed by<br />
the cell.<br />
In addition, some marine invertebrates consume algae<br />
but keep the algal chloroplasts alive in some <strong>of</strong> their cells.<br />
This strongly suggests that chloroplasts and mitochondria<br />
may have arisen in a similar way, as symbiotic bacteria that<br />
symbiogenesis<br />
lost most <strong>of</strong> their genetic independence—but not quite all <strong>of</strong><br />
it, thus betraying their symbiogenetic origins.<br />
As techniques became available to actually determine the<br />
sequence <strong>of</strong> nucleotides within DNA and other nucleic acids,<br />
it became possible to make comparisons between the DNA <strong>of</strong><br />
different species to determine their evolutionary relationships.<br />
Following the initial lead <strong>of</strong> Carl R. Woese <strong>of</strong> the University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Illinois (see Woese, Carl R.), biologists constructed a tree<br />
<strong>of</strong> life showing the branching patterns <strong>of</strong> evolution (see DNA<br />
[evidence for evolution]). The tree was based solely upon<br />
living species, from which DNA and RNA could be obtained.<br />
Mitochondrial genes turned out to be very close to aerobic<br />
bacteria on the tree <strong>of</strong> life, and not at all similar to the genes<br />
in the nuclei <strong>of</strong> the cells in which mitochondria live. Chloroplast<br />
genes turned out to more closely resemble cyanobacteria<br />
on the tree <strong>of</strong> life than the genes in the nuclei <strong>of</strong> the plant<br />
cells in which they now live. This is precisely what would be<br />
expected as confirmation <strong>of</strong> Margulis’s symbiogenetic theory<br />
<strong>of</strong> their origins.<br />
While nearly all biologists accept Margulis’s symbiogenetic<br />
explanation <strong>of</strong> the origin <strong>of</strong> chloroplasts and mitochondria,<br />
some <strong>of</strong> her subsequent proposals have not met with<br />
widespread acceptance. Perhaps the most famous example<br />
is her proposal that the motile structures <strong>of</strong> eukaryotic cells<br />
were originally symbiotic bacteria as well.<br />
Margulis uses the term undulipodia (“undulating feet”<br />
in Greek) to denote structures in eukaryotic cells that are<br />
usually called cilia and eukaryotic flagella. Cilia are hairlike<br />
structures on the outside <strong>of</strong> many eukaryotic cells, for example<br />
free-living protists, and the cells that line animal respiratory<br />
passages, and that have the power <strong>of</strong> movement. Cilia<br />
assist in the movement <strong>of</strong> protists such as Paramecium, and<br />
some small aquatic animals. Flagella are whiplike structures<br />
with which many eukaryotic cells can swim, for example protists<br />
like Euglena, and sperm cells. Many bacteria also have<br />
flagella with which they propel themselves, but the smaller<br />
rotary structure <strong>of</strong> bacterial flagella is totally unlike the more<br />
complex structure <strong>of</strong> eukaryotic flagella, which is why Margulis<br />
does not use the same term for both <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
Margulis has also pointed out similarity in composition<br />
between undulipodia and the mitotic spindle apparatus in<br />
eukaryotic cells. Before mitosis begins, chromosomes replicate;<br />
in mitosis, small protein strands in the spindle move the<br />
chromosomes into two groups, which then form the nuclei <strong>of</strong><br />
two cells. Margulis points out structural similarities between<br />
undulipodia and the spindle apparatus; and that eukaryotic<br />
cells do not have undulipodia and a spindle apparatus at the<br />
same time. This implies that, even though they now look and<br />
act very differently, undulipodia and the spindle apparatus<br />
evolved from the same ancestral structure.<br />
Margulis claims that the protein strands within undulipodia<br />
and within the spindle apparatus are the remnants <strong>of</strong><br />
spirochete bacteria. How might this have occurred? Today,<br />
there are examples <strong>of</strong> spirochete bacteria that burrow partway<br />
into protist cells. The protruding parts <strong>of</strong> the bacteria<br />
flap in a coordinated rhythm, propelling the protist cell.<br />
These protists, when viewed under the microscope, look just