24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

vestigial characteristics Vestigial characteristics are traits<br />

<strong>of</strong> organisms that no longer have a useful primary function<br />

but are leftovers or vestiges <strong>of</strong> characteristics that had a useful<br />

primary function in evolutionary ancestors. They usually<br />

result from a process such as the following:<br />

1. A characteristic has an important function in an organism.<br />

For example, stamens in flowers produce pollen.<br />

2. As circumstances change, the characteristic is no longer<br />

important for the organism. natural selection no longer<br />

eliminates individuals that lack the full development<br />

<strong>of</strong> the characteristic. For example, flowers (at least, those<br />

with male function) need stamens but may not need all <strong>of</strong><br />

the stamens that they have.<br />

3. Mutations may cause incomplete development <strong>of</strong> the characteristic.<br />

For example, many flowers produce staminodes,<br />

which are sterile stamens—shafts that produce no pollen.<br />

This structure is now considered vestigial.<br />

4. If the vestigial structure represents no significant cost to<br />

the organism, then natural selection will not eliminate it.<br />

Also, in many cases, natural selection may be in the process<br />

<strong>of</strong> eliminating a vestigial characteristic but has not<br />

completed this process.<br />

It is always risky to call a characteristic useless because<br />

it is always possible to discover a use for the characteristic<br />

later. Critics <strong>of</strong> evolutionary science (see creationism) like<br />

to cite the example <strong>of</strong> the German anatomist Robert Wiedersheim<br />

who, in 1895, listed about a hundred organs which he<br />

considered vestigial in humans. Many <strong>of</strong> these organs turned<br />

out to have important functions (for example, tonsils) even<br />

though a person could in fact survive without them. The fact<br />

that a person can survive with only one leg (or none) does not<br />

prove that legs are useless. However, vestigial and useless are<br />

not the same thing; and it is not possible to so easily dispose<br />

<strong>of</strong> vestigial characteristics as evidence for evolution as the following<br />

examples indicate.<br />

V<br />

0<br />

Vestigial characteristics can be found at all levels <strong>of</strong><br />

organism structure and function:<br />

At the biochemical level. The DNA <strong>of</strong> eukaryotic organisms<br />

contains a large, sometimes prodigious, amount <strong>of</strong> noncoding<br />

DNA. In most eukaryotes, well over half <strong>of</strong> the DNA<br />

is noncoding—that is, it does not result in the production <strong>of</strong><br />

a protein. While some <strong>of</strong> this noncoding DNA has important<br />

functions, much <strong>of</strong> this DNA is vestigial. Pseudogenes, for<br />

example, are very similar in structure to true genes, but they<br />

do not have a promoter, therefore they are not used. They<br />

are old genes that the cell no longer uses. The cell has deleted<br />

the gene the same way a computer deletes a file—not by<br />

eliminating it entirely, but by deleting the information about<br />

how to find and use it (see DNA [raw material <strong>of</strong> evolution]).<br />

Much human DNA consists <strong>of</strong> instructions for making<br />

reverse transcriptase—an enzyme not used by humans but<br />

which is the remnant <strong>of</strong> the past activity <strong>of</strong> retroviruses.<br />

At the cellular level. Some cellular organelles, such as<br />

chloroplasts and mitochondria, are the simplified descendants<br />

<strong>of</strong> symbiotic bacteria (see symbiogenesis). Chloroplasts and<br />

mitochondria still have some <strong>of</strong> their own DNA and genes,<br />

and their own ribosomes, which allow them to produce proteins<br />

from their own genes. As they no longer have all <strong>of</strong><br />

the genes that they need for survival, they cannot live independently<br />

<strong>of</strong> the host cell. Many cell structures such as the<br />

endoplasmic reticulum did not arise by symbiosis; they function<br />

just fine without their own DNA or ribosomes, because<br />

the nucleus <strong>of</strong> the cell has all the genes, and the cytoplasm<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cell has all the ribosomes, necessary for the synthesis<br />

and activity <strong>of</strong> the endoplasmic reticulum. Chloroplasts and<br />

mitochondria are a transitional form—they have lost enough<br />

genes that they cannot live on their own, but they have not<br />

lost all <strong>of</strong> them. While their genes are, in fact, useful, these<br />

genes do not need to be in the chloroplasts and mitochondria<br />

themselves. Perhaps even more striking is the fact that the<br />

chloroplasts <strong>of</strong> some protists (such as din<strong>of</strong>lagellates) are the<br />

evolutionary descendants not <strong>of</strong> bacteria but <strong>of</strong> eukaryotic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!