24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

selfish genetic elements<br />

Sex chromosomes. In many species, the gender <strong>of</strong> an<br />

individual is determined by sex chromosomes. In humans,<br />

females have two X chromosomes, while males have an X<br />

and a Y chromosome, although in other species the pattern<br />

can be quite different (see sex, evolution <strong>of</strong>). The chromosome<br />

associated with males (in humans, the Y) is usually<br />

much smaller than the chromosome associated with<br />

females (in humans, the X). Consider what would happen<br />

if the X chromosome encodes a gene that produces a chemical<br />

that destroys the Y chromosome. An X chromosome<br />

that destroyed Y chromosomes would cause the reproductive<br />

cells to more commonly carry the X than the Y chromosome—resulting<br />

in a disproportionately large number <strong>of</strong><br />

female <strong>of</strong>fspring. From the viewpoint <strong>of</strong> the X chromosome,<br />

this could be advantageous. Since X chromosomes are inside<br />

<strong>of</strong> female cells two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the time and male cells only<br />

one-third <strong>of</strong> the time, an X chromosome that killed Y chromosomes<br />

might be passed on more efficiently into the next<br />

generation than an X chromosome that did not do so. The<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the spread <strong>of</strong> the dangerous X chromosome would<br />

be a population that consisted mostly <strong>of</strong> females, with few<br />

males.<br />

What process might be able to stop the spread <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dangerous X? Once again, it is possible that silencing factors<br />

in the nucleus might be involved. Another process,<br />

however, has apparently been the reduction in size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Y chromosome. Many <strong>of</strong> the genes in the Y chromosome<br />

have migrated to other chromosomes, with the result that<br />

the Y chromosome (in humans) now has very few genes.<br />

The Y chromosome, being smaller, has fewer sites upon<br />

which chemicals encoded by genes in the X chromosome can<br />

bind—that is, the Y chromosome has evolved to become a<br />

smaller target.<br />

In wood lemmings, some X chromosomes (denoted X*)<br />

are dominant feminizers: X*Y are female, not male. When<br />

an X*Y female mates with a normal XY male, one-fourth <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>of</strong>fspring will be YY and will never develop. As a result,<br />

two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the surviving <strong>of</strong>fspring will carry the X* chromosome,<br />

not the expected one-half. This allows the X*<br />

chromosome to spread through the rodent population. Once<br />

again, the frequency-dependent reproductive advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

rare males counteracts this trend.<br />

Meiotic drive. Meiotic drive can occur in two ways.<br />

First, it may occur when a chromosome that originated from<br />

either the mother or the father ends up in more than half <strong>of</strong><br />

the gametes produced by the <strong>of</strong>fspring. Second, it may occur<br />

when gametes with a chromosome either from the mother or<br />

the father are more successful at fertilization.<br />

The <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> the F 1 generation receive alleles from<br />

both the mother and the father. The pattern expected from<br />

Mendelian genetics is that half <strong>of</strong> the gametes produced by<br />

meiosis in these F 1 individuals will carry the paternal allele,<br />

and half will carry the maternal allele. This produces the<br />

familiar 3:1 ratio in the F 2 generation. In contrast, meiotic<br />

drive can cause the paternal allele or the maternal allele to be<br />

present in more than half <strong>of</strong> the gametes.<br />

One way this can happen is through what have been<br />

called “selfish centromeres.” During meiosis, protein<br />

strands pull the chromosomes apart so that each resulting<br />

cell receives a full set <strong>of</strong> chromosomes. Centromeres are<br />

segments <strong>of</strong> DNA in a chromosome to which these protein<br />

strands attach. A larger centromere might be able to link<br />

with more strands, allowing its chromosome to be preferentially<br />

pulled to one <strong>of</strong> the resulting cells. There is no<br />

advantage associated with this in the production <strong>of</strong> sperm<br />

or pollen, since spermatocytes in animals and microsporocytes<br />

in higher plants typically produce four sperm or<br />

pollen grains. That is, both the maternal and paternal chromosomes<br />

are assured <strong>of</strong> ending up in a male sex cell. In the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> eggs or ovules, however, a conflict <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

can arise that creates a situation that may favor selfish<br />

centromeres. During meiosis <strong>of</strong> oocytes in animals and<br />

megasporocytes in higher plants, only one egg or ovule is<br />

produced; the other two or three cells (polar cells) disintegrate.<br />

The chromosome with a bigger centromere (a selfish<br />

centromere) may be more likely to end up in the egg<br />

or ovule rather than being lost in a polar cell. Research<br />

by evolutionary biologist Lila Fishman has shown that, in<br />

hybridization between two species <strong>of</strong> monkeyflower (Mimulus<br />

guttatus and M. nasutus), the M. guttatus chromosomes<br />

get passed on in the ovules <strong>of</strong> hybrids much more<br />

effectively than do the M. nasutus chromosomes, perhaps<br />

because the M. guttatus chromosomes have better centromeres.<br />

About 10 percent <strong>of</strong> species have “B chromosomes,”<br />

which end up in reproductive cells more <strong>of</strong>ten than other<br />

chromosomes.<br />

Meiotic drive may also occur if the sperm or pollen with<br />

a chromosome from one <strong>of</strong> the original parents are more successful<br />

at fertilizing eggs or ovules than are the sperm or pollen<br />

that contain the chromosome from the other parent. This<br />

amounts to competition between sperm as they swim or pollen<br />

tubes as they grow through female cone tissue or the style<br />

<strong>of</strong> a flower. This is not likely to occur with eggs or ovules,<br />

since eggs and ovules are largely stationary. Paternal or<br />

maternal alleles may also promote the death <strong>of</strong> zygotes that<br />

contain the other allele.<br />

Gene-centered view <strong>of</strong> selection. <strong>Evolution</strong>ary biologist<br />

Richard Dawkins (see Dawkins, Richard) explains natural<br />

selection in terms <strong>of</strong> selfish genes. Genes are using cells as<br />

their vehicles for reproduction, and natural selection favors<br />

the most efficiently selfish genes.<br />

This viewpoint has been much criticized. Critics have<br />

pointed out that in very few cases can genes express themselves<br />

individually in the phenotype <strong>of</strong> the organism. Genes<br />

act in complex developmental pathways. When natural selection<br />

acts upon individuals (causing some to reproduce more,<br />

some less, some not at all) it has at best an extremely indirect<br />

effect on favoring one gene over another.<br />

At least two responses to these criticisms are possible.<br />

First, one <strong>of</strong> the ways in which selfish genes can get themselves<br />

most effectively passed on into the next generation is<br />

by cooperating with other genes. On the level <strong>of</strong> the individual,<br />

this happens frequently when the coevolution <strong>of</strong><br />

species produces symbiosis, and when it progresses as far as<br />

symbiogenesis. If individuals and species can cooperate with<br />

one another even though they are selfish, then genes should

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!