Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
selfish genetic elements<br />
Sex chromosomes. In many species, the gender <strong>of</strong> an<br />
individual is determined by sex chromosomes. In humans,<br />
females have two X chromosomes, while males have an X<br />
and a Y chromosome, although in other species the pattern<br />
can be quite different (see sex, evolution <strong>of</strong>). The chromosome<br />
associated with males (in humans, the Y) is usually<br />
much smaller than the chromosome associated with<br />
females (in humans, the X). Consider what would happen<br />
if the X chromosome encodes a gene that produces a chemical<br />
that destroys the Y chromosome. An X chromosome<br />
that destroyed Y chromosomes would cause the reproductive<br />
cells to more commonly carry the X than the Y chromosome—resulting<br />
in a disproportionately large number <strong>of</strong><br />
female <strong>of</strong>fspring. From the viewpoint <strong>of</strong> the X chromosome,<br />
this could be advantageous. Since X chromosomes are inside<br />
<strong>of</strong> female cells two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the time and male cells only<br />
one-third <strong>of</strong> the time, an X chromosome that killed Y chromosomes<br />
might be passed on more efficiently into the next<br />
generation than an X chromosome that did not do so. The<br />
result <strong>of</strong> the spread <strong>of</strong> the dangerous X chromosome would<br />
be a population that consisted mostly <strong>of</strong> females, with few<br />
males.<br />
What process might be able to stop the spread <strong>of</strong> the<br />
dangerous X? Once again, it is possible that silencing factors<br />
in the nucleus might be involved. Another process,<br />
however, has apparently been the reduction in size <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Y chromosome. Many <strong>of</strong> the genes in the Y chromosome<br />
have migrated to other chromosomes, with the result that<br />
the Y chromosome (in humans) now has very few genes.<br />
The Y chromosome, being smaller, has fewer sites upon<br />
which chemicals encoded by genes in the X chromosome can<br />
bind—that is, the Y chromosome has evolved to become a<br />
smaller target.<br />
In wood lemmings, some X chromosomes (denoted X*)<br />
are dominant feminizers: X*Y are female, not male. When<br />
an X*Y female mates with a normal XY male, one-fourth <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>of</strong>fspring will be YY and will never develop. As a result,<br />
two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the surviving <strong>of</strong>fspring will carry the X* chromosome,<br />
not the expected one-half. This allows the X*<br />
chromosome to spread through the rodent population. Once<br />
again, the frequency-dependent reproductive advantage <strong>of</strong><br />
rare males counteracts this trend.<br />
Meiotic drive. Meiotic drive can occur in two ways.<br />
First, it may occur when a chromosome that originated from<br />
either the mother or the father ends up in more than half <strong>of</strong><br />
the gametes produced by the <strong>of</strong>fspring. Second, it may occur<br />
when gametes with a chromosome either from the mother or<br />
the father are more successful at fertilization.<br />
The <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> the F 1 generation receive alleles from<br />
both the mother and the father. The pattern expected from<br />
Mendelian genetics is that half <strong>of</strong> the gametes produced by<br />
meiosis in these F 1 individuals will carry the paternal allele,<br />
and half will carry the maternal allele. This produces the<br />
familiar 3:1 ratio in the F 2 generation. In contrast, meiotic<br />
drive can cause the paternal allele or the maternal allele to be<br />
present in more than half <strong>of</strong> the gametes.<br />
One way this can happen is through what have been<br />
called “selfish centromeres.” During meiosis, protein<br />
strands pull the chromosomes apart so that each resulting<br />
cell receives a full set <strong>of</strong> chromosomes. Centromeres are<br />
segments <strong>of</strong> DNA in a chromosome to which these protein<br />
strands attach. A larger centromere might be able to link<br />
with more strands, allowing its chromosome to be preferentially<br />
pulled to one <strong>of</strong> the resulting cells. There is no<br />
advantage associated with this in the production <strong>of</strong> sperm<br />
or pollen, since spermatocytes in animals and microsporocytes<br />
in higher plants typically produce four sperm or<br />
pollen grains. That is, both the maternal and paternal chromosomes<br />
are assured <strong>of</strong> ending up in a male sex cell. In the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> eggs or ovules, however, a conflict <strong>of</strong> interest<br />
can arise that creates a situation that may favor selfish<br />
centromeres. During meiosis <strong>of</strong> oocytes in animals and<br />
megasporocytes in higher plants, only one egg or ovule is<br />
produced; the other two or three cells (polar cells) disintegrate.<br />
The chromosome with a bigger centromere (a selfish<br />
centromere) may be more likely to end up in the egg<br />
or ovule rather than being lost in a polar cell. Research<br />
by evolutionary biologist Lila Fishman has shown that, in<br />
hybridization between two species <strong>of</strong> monkeyflower (Mimulus<br />
guttatus and M. nasutus), the M. guttatus chromosomes<br />
get passed on in the ovules <strong>of</strong> hybrids much more<br />
effectively than do the M. nasutus chromosomes, perhaps<br />
because the M. guttatus chromosomes have better centromeres.<br />
About 10 percent <strong>of</strong> species have “B chromosomes,”<br />
which end up in reproductive cells more <strong>of</strong>ten than other<br />
chromosomes.<br />
Meiotic drive may also occur if the sperm or pollen with<br />
a chromosome from one <strong>of</strong> the original parents are more successful<br />
at fertilizing eggs or ovules than are the sperm or pollen<br />
that contain the chromosome from the other parent. This<br />
amounts to competition between sperm as they swim or pollen<br />
tubes as they grow through female cone tissue or the style<br />
<strong>of</strong> a flower. This is not likely to occur with eggs or ovules,<br />
since eggs and ovules are largely stationary. Paternal or<br />
maternal alleles may also promote the death <strong>of</strong> zygotes that<br />
contain the other allele.<br />
Gene-centered view <strong>of</strong> selection. <strong>Evolution</strong>ary biologist<br />
Richard Dawkins (see Dawkins, Richard) explains natural<br />
selection in terms <strong>of</strong> selfish genes. Genes are using cells as<br />
their vehicles for reproduction, and natural selection favors<br />
the most efficiently selfish genes.<br />
This viewpoint has been much criticized. Critics have<br />
pointed out that in very few cases can genes express themselves<br />
individually in the phenotype <strong>of</strong> the organism. Genes<br />
act in complex developmental pathways. When natural selection<br />
acts upon individuals (causing some to reproduce more,<br />
some less, some not at all) it has at best an extremely indirect<br />
effect on favoring one gene over another.<br />
At least two responses to these criticisms are possible.<br />
First, one <strong>of</strong> the ways in which selfish genes can get themselves<br />
most effectively passed on into the next generation is<br />
by cooperating with other genes. On the level <strong>of</strong> the individual,<br />
this happens frequently when the coevolution <strong>of</strong><br />
species produces symbiosis, and when it progresses as far as<br />
symbiogenesis. If individuals and species can cooperate with<br />
one another even though they are selfish, then genes should