Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Woese, Carl R.<br />
sociobiology provided an intellectual justification for oppression.<br />
At a 1978 meeting <strong>of</strong> the American Association for the<br />
Advancement <strong>of</strong> Science in Washington D.C., Wilson was<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the platform scientists at a discussion <strong>of</strong> human evolution.<br />
Protesters chanted, “Racist Wilson you can’t hide, we<br />
charge you with genocide!” A protester jumped up on stage<br />
with a pitcher <strong>of</strong> water and poured it all over Wilson, saying,<br />
“Wilson, you are all wet!” <strong>Evolution</strong>ary anthropologist<br />
Napoleon Chagnon helped push the protester <strong>of</strong>f the stage,<br />
and Stephen Jay Gould took the microphone to denounce<br />
the protesters’ tactics. Meanwhile Wilson just wiped <strong>of</strong>f the<br />
water and continued with the meeting. No one who has met<br />
Wilson can believe that he in any way condones the misuse <strong>of</strong><br />
sociobiology as a rationalization for political oppression.<br />
If anyone could handle the challenge <strong>of</strong> trying to bring<br />
together all fields <strong>of</strong> knowledge into a single unified structure,<br />
it would be Edward Wilson. His 1998 Consilience<br />
called for a return to original Enlightenment ideals for<br />
bridging the sciences and the humanities. College education<br />
is a smorgasbord <strong>of</strong> largely disconnected subjects that<br />
leaves undergraduates more annoyed than enlightened; the<br />
typical divisions <strong>of</strong> a newspaper (news, business, sports, leisure)<br />
are even more disconnected. Rather than to have science<br />
as just one area <strong>of</strong> study, equal perhaps to music, or<br />
as an occasional page in a newspaper, Wilson wants science,<br />
particularly evolutionary science, to be understood as the<br />
foundation <strong>of</strong> all human history and activity. Naturally this<br />
approach has drawn attacks from scholars in the humanities<br />
who do not want their field to be seen as a subset <strong>of</strong><br />
science. Wilson writes, “My truths, three in number, are<br />
the following: first, humanity is ultimately the product <strong>of</strong><br />
biological evolution; second, the diversity <strong>of</strong> life is the cradle<br />
and greatest natural heritage <strong>of</strong> the human species; and<br />
third, philosophy and religion make little sense without taking<br />
into account these first two conceptions.” Although Wilson<br />
admits his approach to consilience may be wrong, it is<br />
widely recognized as one <strong>of</strong> the most concise and organized<br />
attempts ever made.<br />
Wilson has received many <strong>of</strong> the highest awards that are<br />
available. There is no Nobel Prize for evolutionary biology,<br />
but Wilson has received the Crafoord Prize, the award given<br />
by the Royal Swedish Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences for areas not<br />
covered by the Nobel Prize, as well as the National Medal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Science in the United States. In addition to his two Pulitzer<br />
prizes, Wilson has received prestigious prizes in Japan,<br />
France, Italy, and Saudi Arabia and from world conservation<br />
organizations. As much as he cherishes these prizes, he is still<br />
very grateful for the teaching awards he has received from the<br />
students <strong>of</strong> Harvard University.<br />
Even though most people his age have decided to take it<br />
easy, Wilson still has major projects. His primary goal is to<br />
facilitate the formation <strong>of</strong> an “<strong>Encyclopedia</strong> <strong>of</strong> Life,” which<br />
will use modern technology to speed up the process <strong>of</strong> documenting<br />
the Earth’s rapidly disappearing biodiversity. His<br />
motto might be reflected in this quote, “Love the organisms<br />
for themselves first, then strain for general explanations, and,<br />
with good fortune, discoveries will follow. If they don’t, the<br />
love and the pleasure will have been enough.” Even though<br />
he is one <strong>of</strong> the most respected scientists <strong>of</strong> modern times, he<br />
will not hesitate to crouch down on the ground to look at an<br />
ant. He is still, at heart, a Boy Scout working on an insect<br />
merit badge.<br />
Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />
Cowley, Ge<strong>of</strong>frey. “Wilson’s world.” Newsweek, 22 June 1998, 58–<br />
62.<br />
MacArthur, Robert H., and Edward O. Wilson. Theory <strong>of</strong> Island<br />
Biogeography. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1967.<br />
Wilson, Edward O. Biophilia. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University<br />
Press, 1984.<br />
———. Consilience: The Unity <strong>of</strong> Knowledge. New York: Vintage<br />
Press, 1998.<br />
———. The Diversity <strong>of</strong> Life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University<br />
Press, 1992.<br />
———. “The encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> life.” Trends in Ecology and <strong>Evolution</strong><br />
18 (February 2003): 77–80.<br />
———. The Future <strong>of</strong> Life. New York: Vintage Press, 2002.<br />
———. Nature Revealed: Selected Writings, 1949–2006. Baltimore,<br />
Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.<br />
———. Naturalist. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1994.<br />
———. On Human Nature. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University<br />
Press, 1978.<br />
———. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard<br />
University Press, 1975.<br />
———, and William H. Bossert. A Primer <strong>of</strong> Population Biology.<br />
Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, 1971.<br />
———, and Bert Hölldobler. The Ants. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard<br />
University Press, 1990.<br />
Woese, Carl R. (1928– ) American Microbiologist, <strong>Evolution</strong>ary<br />
scientist Carl R. Woese (see photo on page 419) is<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the few scientists whose research has transformed the<br />
way scientists think about life and evolution. His work laid<br />
the foundation for the molecular study <strong>of</strong> evolution and for<br />
the tree <strong>of</strong> life. Born July 15, 1928, Woese studied physics<br />
as an undergraduate at Amherst College, and biophysics for<br />
his doctorate at Yale. He joined the microbiology faculty at<br />
the University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1964.<br />
Woese’s first major contribution was to demonstrate the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> using DNA to test hypotheses <strong>of</strong> evolutionary<br />
relatedness, rather than using visible anatomical structures<br />
(see DNA [evidence for evolution]). This is especially<br />
important for comparisons among prokaryotes such as bacteria,<br />
which have relatively few visible differences, and for<br />
comparing prokaryotes with more complex organisms such<br />
as humans. <strong>Evolution</strong>ary change leaves a record in the DNA,<br />
even when almost all visible differences between two species<br />
(for example, between a bacterium and a human) have<br />
vanished in evolutionary time. Woese was not the only scientist<br />
to think <strong>of</strong> using DNA to reconstruct evolutionary<br />
history, but very few other scientists attempted it, because<br />
in the 1970s the techniques were very laborious and slow.<br />
Techniques that had to be done by hand and required weeks<br />
<strong>of</strong> work are now automated and can be done overnight. It