Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
natural selection<br />
Fact 1. Populations can grow exponentially. Because<br />
reproductive groups <strong>of</strong> individuals can multiply, populations<br />
grow in curves, not in lines (see population). In a population<br />
<strong>of</strong> bacteria, one bacterium can produce two, but one<br />
million bacteria can produce two million bacteria during cell<br />
division. This allows populations to grow explosively. This<br />
will occur, <strong>of</strong> course, only in an unlimited environment. As<br />
Darwin wrote:<br />
There is no exception to the rule that every organic<br />
being naturally increases at so high a rate, that, if<br />
not destroyed, the earth would be covered by the<br />
progeny <strong>of</strong> a single pair. Even slow-breeding man<br />
has doubled in twenty-five years, and at this rate,<br />
in less than a thousand years, there would literally<br />
not be standing-room for his progeny. Linnaeus has<br />
calculated that if an annual plant produced only<br />
two seeds—and there is no plant so unproductive<br />
as this—and their seedlings next year produced two,<br />
and so on, then in twenty years there should be a<br />
million plants.<br />
Darwin did some calculations for the Origin <strong>of</strong> Species (incorrectly,<br />
as it turned out) on the reproductive rate and population<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> elephants in an unlimited environment:<br />
The elephant is reckoned the slowest breeder <strong>of</strong> all<br />
known animals, and I have taken some pains to estimate<br />
its probable minimum rate <strong>of</strong> natural increase;<br />
it will be safest to assume that it begins breeding<br />
when thirty years old, and goes on breeding till<br />
ninety years old, bringing forth six young in the<br />
interval, and surviving till one hundred years old; if<br />
this be so, after a period <strong>of</strong> from 740 to 750 years<br />
there would be nearly nineteen million elephants<br />
alive, descended from the first pair.<br />
Fact 2. Populations sometimes grow, and sometimes<br />
become smaller, but tend to remain stable. Therefore something<br />
must be preventing population growth, either by<br />
repressing reproduction or by causing death. Darwin wrote:<br />
Lighten any check, mitigate the destruction ever<br />
so little, and the number <strong>of</strong> the species will almost<br />
instantaneously increase to any amount.<br />
Darwin insisted on evidence, and on experimentation<br />
where possible. He dug and cleared a small plot <strong>of</strong> ground<br />
at his estate and laboriously marked each seedling that germinated.<br />
The total was 357. Of these, 295 seedlings died,<br />
mainly because slugs and insects ate them. He also counted<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> bird nests on his property in the spring <strong>of</strong><br />
1854 and again in the spring <strong>of</strong> 1855 and estimated that<br />
during the intervening winter nearly four-fifths <strong>of</strong> the birds<br />
had died.<br />
Fact 3. Resources are limited. Ultimately, if reproduction<br />
continued unabated, “the world could not contain” the <strong>of</strong>fspring,<br />
as Darwin wrote. However, resources are limited by<br />
much more than simply room in the world. Organisms need<br />
resources and ecosystem services that provide food, water,<br />
shelter, and oxygen, and process their wastes. Each kind <strong>of</strong><br />
organism is adapted to live in only a limited range <strong>of</strong> conditions;<br />
therefore, for a polar bear, it does not much matter<br />
how big the world is, but only how big the arctic is, and<br />
for species that are limited to a single island or mountain or<br />
swamp, the world is pretty small. The disparity between limited<br />
resources and exponential population growth in human<br />
societies had been famously pointed out by Malthus (see<br />
Malthus, Thomas), and Darwin simply applied it to nature:<br />
“It is the doctrine <strong>of</strong> Malthus applied with manifold force to<br />
the whole animal and vegetable kingdoms …”<br />
These three facts lead to Inference 1, which is the struggle<br />
for existence. In nearly all natural populations, there are<br />
not enough resources for all <strong>of</strong> the individuals to have all <strong>of</strong><br />
the resources they need. Today scientists say that competition<br />
occurs in nearly all natural populations nearly all <strong>of</strong> the<br />
time. Sometimes competition is strong enough that scientists<br />
can actually observe the struggle. In a jungle, vines grow<br />
over trees, and trees crowd together, as if they are fighting<br />
for access to the light. In a desert, the bushes are evenly<br />
spaced across the landscape, because there is not enough<br />
water for any bush to grow close to another bush. Predators<br />
fight over a kill, and birds chase one another out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
choice territories. But even when it cannot be seen, competition<br />
can be inferred. Competition is the unavoidable result<br />
<strong>of</strong> exponential population growth and limited resources. As<br />
Darwin wrote:<br />
Nothing is easier than to admit in words the truth <strong>of</strong><br />
the universal struggle for life, or more difficult—at<br />
least I have found it so—than constantly to bear this<br />
conclusion in mind … We behold the face <strong>of</strong> nature<br />
bright with gladness, we <strong>of</strong>ten see superabundance<br />
<strong>of</strong> food; we do not see or we forget, that the birds<br />
that are idly singing round us live on insects or<br />
seeds, and are thus constantly destroying life; or we<br />
forget how largely these songsters, or their eggs, or<br />
their nestlings, are destroyed by birds or beasts <strong>of</strong><br />
prey; we do not always bear in mind, that, though<br />
food may now be superabundant, it is not so at all<br />
seasons <strong>of</strong> each recurring year.<br />
Darwin’s theory <strong>of</strong> evolution by means <strong>of</strong> natural selection<br />
severely shook the complacency <strong>of</strong> European science,<br />
which had comfortably assumed the divine creation and<br />
long-term stability <strong>of</strong> species. His invention <strong>of</strong> ecology had<br />
at least as great an affect on scientific and popular thought.<br />
Many people thought <strong>of</strong> the natural world as God’s vast and<br />
orderly garden, full <strong>of</strong> life. Darwin showed the natural world<br />
to be violent and full <strong>of</strong> death. To his readers, Darwin had<br />
shaken their view <strong>of</strong> the world—and they had not even gotten<br />
past Chapter 3 (The Struggle for Existence) <strong>of</strong> the Origin!<br />
The poet Alfred, Lord Tennyson, reflected the sadness not<br />
only <strong>of</strong> the death <strong>of</strong> individuals but the extinction <strong>of</strong> species<br />
in his poem In Memoriam, which is the origin <strong>of</strong> the famous<br />
phrase “red in tooth and claw.” (Tennyson published the