Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ig bang<br />
make nests with horizontal combs on tree boughs or rocks.<br />
It is likely that A. mellifera evolved from bees with habits<br />
similar to those still found in A. florea. When the dwarf bee<br />
scout returns from a new food source, she performs a dance<br />
on the horizontal surface <strong>of</strong> the comb in which the straight<br />
run points directly toward the food. This intermediate evolutionary<br />
step in the evolution <strong>of</strong> the bee dance has in fact been<br />
observed.<br />
Another necessary step in the evolution <strong>of</strong> the bee dance<br />
would be for gravity (on the vertical honeycomb in the dark<br />
hive) to substitute for light (on the horizontal honeycomb on<br />
the rock or branch). A scientist performed an experiment in<br />
which a light bulb was placed in a honeybee hive. When a<br />
scout was dancing, the scientist turned on the light. The scout<br />
then altered the direction <strong>of</strong> her waggle dance to align to the<br />
light, rather than to gravity. Apparently the honeybee retains<br />
a primitive instinct to align its dance to the Sun, an instinct<br />
it has not used since it evolved the habit <strong>of</strong> making vertical<br />
honeycombs in the dark.<br />
The evolution <strong>of</strong> complex behavior patterns is slow and<br />
gradual and has not been observed to occur over short periods<br />
<strong>of</strong> time. However, as in the case <strong>of</strong> bee foraging behavior,<br />
some behavior patterns that scientists believe to have been<br />
present in the ancestors <strong>of</strong> honeybees can still be found, in<br />
honeybees or their close relatives.<br />
2. Fitness advantages <strong>of</strong> specific behaviors. The study<br />
<strong>of</strong> the fitness advantages conferred by natural selection upon<br />
behavior patterns is called sociobiology. Sociobiology has<br />
been particularly successful at explaining the fitness advantages<br />
<strong>of</strong> altruism, especially in social insects. Sociobiology<br />
has <strong>of</strong>ten explained the evolution <strong>of</strong> fixed action patterns,<br />
and <strong>of</strong> learning abilities. A central idea <strong>of</strong> sociobiology is that<br />
an understanding <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary basis <strong>of</strong> behavior in one<br />
animal species should provide insights into the behavior <strong>of</strong><br />
other species, including humans. As behavioral scientist Tim<br />
Friend says, “No matter where you look, just about every<br />
creature is obsessed with sex, real estate, who’s the boss, and<br />
what’s for dinner.”<br />
Sociobiology has proven controversial among scientists<br />
particularly when sociobiologists have attempted to explain<br />
the fitness advantage <strong>of</strong> specific human behavior patterns.<br />
Examples include religion and the fear <strong>of</strong> strangers (see religion,<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong>). Sociobiologists point to the universality<br />
<strong>of</strong> these behaviors, and the fitness advantages that would<br />
result from them. This implies, sociobiologists claim, that<br />
the specific behavior patterns are genetically based. Sociobiologists<br />
do not deny that learning and volition can modify or<br />
override these genetically based behaviors. Critics <strong>of</strong> sociobiology<br />
claim that natural selection has caused the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
a human brain that is so large and flexible that its ability to<br />
learn and modify human behavior far outweighs any residual<br />
genetic influence. To the critics, human behavior results from<br />
a genetically-based brain, but specific human behavior patterns<br />
have no genetic basis (see essay, “How Much Do Genes<br />
Control Human Behavior?”).<br />
Each species evolves its own set <strong>of</strong> behavioral patterns.<br />
Some behavioral patterns have evolved in more than one<br />
species because these patterns allow communication that is<br />
beneficial to more than one species. An example is Müllerian<br />
mimicry (see mimicry) in which dangerous prey all share a<br />
common set <strong>of</strong> warning coloration patterns (usually black<br />
alternating with white, yellow, orange, or red). Warning coloration<br />
alerts predators to leave these dangerous prey animals<br />
alone. More than one animal species can also share the ability<br />
to produce and recognize warning calls. Mammals have<br />
been seen to respond to bird calls that indicate the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> a predator.<br />
Behavior patterns may not be only a response to environmental<br />
conditions, but can contribute to those conditions. If<br />
some animals within a group learn a new behavior, it can give<br />
them a fitness advantage; the behavior can spread through the<br />
group, or the entire species, by a nongenetic learning process.<br />
This newly acquired behavior creates a situation in which<br />
there is a fitness advantage for any genetic variation that may<br />
make that behavior easier or more effective. A bird may learn<br />
to eat a new type <strong>of</strong> food, which is not an evolutionary modification.<br />
However, any mutant birds that had a genetically<br />
based preference for that new type <strong>of</strong> food, or beaks that<br />
allowed them to eat it more efficiently, would be favored by<br />
natural selection. This is gene-culture coevolution.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the greatest difficulties in studying the evolution<br />
<strong>of</strong> animal behavior is that humans tend to impute consciousness,<br />
volition, even intelligence, to practically every action,<br />
not only to the behavior <strong>of</strong> animals but even to storms and<br />
earthquakes. Even though scientists have demonstrated that<br />
many complex animal behaviors result from fixed action patterns<br />
modified by learning, human observers cannot help but<br />
imagine that these behaviors are conscious and purposeful.<br />
<strong>Evolution</strong>ary philosopher Daniel Dennett has focused attention<br />
on the conditions that would favor the evolution <strong>of</strong> true<br />
consciousness, as opposed to behavioral patterns that simply<br />
appear conscious to human observers.<br />
Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />
Alcock, John. Animal Behavior: An <strong>Evolution</strong>ary Approach. Sunderland,<br />
Mass.: Sinauer Associates, 2001.<br />
Dennett, Daniel. Kinds <strong>of</strong> Minds: Towards an Understanding <strong>of</strong> Consciousness.<br />
New York: Basic Books, 1997.<br />
Friend, Tim. Animal Talk: Breaking the Codes <strong>of</strong> Animal Language.<br />
New York: Free Press, 2004.<br />
Lorenz, Konrad. King Solomon’s Ring: New Light on Animal Ways.<br />
1952. Reprint. New York: Routledge, 2002.<br />
big bang See universe, origin <strong>of</strong>.<br />
biodiversity Biodiversity is the total number <strong>of</strong> species<br />
in the world, or within any limited place. Biodiversity is the<br />
product <strong>of</strong> evolution. <strong>Evolution</strong>ary scientists are interested in<br />
how the patterns <strong>of</strong> biodiversity differ from place to place,<br />
and how they have changed over the history <strong>of</strong> the Earth,<br />
because this gives them insight into how the evolutionary<br />
process works.<br />
The most general pattern <strong>of</strong> biodiversity is that the<br />
places on the Earth, and the times in Earth history, that have<br />
the most species are those with the highest temperature and<br />
greatest amount <strong>of</strong> moisture. Today this is represented by the