24.02.2013 Views

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

migrated into Europe and displaced the Neandertals during<br />

the interglacial period. The Neandertals were extinct by<br />

the time the most recent glaciation reached its maximum.<br />

Some anthropologists consider not just the genus Homo<br />

but the modern species H. sapiens to be children <strong>of</strong> the Ice<br />

Age, because the glacial advances forced previously scattered<br />

tribes to come in contact in southern Europe. This is the<br />

period <strong>of</strong> the great Cro-Magnon cave paintings <strong>of</strong> southern<br />

Europe.<br />

Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />

Bonnicksen, Thomas M. “The Great Cold.” Chap. 1 in America’s<br />

Ancient Forests: From the Ice Age to the Age <strong>of</strong> Discovery. New<br />

York: John Wiley, 2000.<br />

Broecker, Wallace S. “Was the Younger Dryas triggered by a flood?”<br />

Science 312 (2006): 1,146–1,147.<br />

Gould, Stephen Jay. “The freezing <strong>of</strong> Noah.” Chap. 7 in The Flamingo’s<br />

Smile: Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton, 1985.<br />

———. “The great Scablands debate.” Chap. 19 in The Panda’s<br />

Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton,<br />

1980.<br />

Macdougall, Doug. Frozen Earth: The Once and Future Story <strong>of</strong> Ice<br />

Ages. Berkeley: University <strong>of</strong> California Press, 2004.<br />

Petit, Rémy J., et al. “Hybridization as a mechanism <strong>of</strong> invasion in<br />

oaks.” New Phytologist 161 (2003): 151–164.<br />

Pielou, E. C. After the Ice Age: The Return <strong>of</strong> Life to Glaciated<br />

North America. Chicago: University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, 1992.<br />

Raymo, Maureen E., L. E. Lisiecki, and Kerim H. Nisancioglu. “Pliopleistocene<br />

ice volume, Antarctic climate, and the global δ 18 O<br />

record.” Science 313 (2006): 492-495.<br />

Scher, Howie D., and Ellen E. Martin. “Timing and climatic consequences<br />

<strong>of</strong> the opening <strong>of</strong> Drake Passage.” Science 312 (2006):<br />

428–430.<br />

Stanley, Steven M. Children <strong>of</strong> the Ice Age: How a Global Catastrophe<br />

Allowed Humans to Evolve. New York: Harmony Books, 1996.<br />

inbreeding depression See Mendelian genetics.<br />

inclusive fitness See altruism.<br />

Inherit the Wind See Scopes Trial.<br />

instinct See behavior, evolution <strong>of</strong>.<br />

intelligence, evolution <strong>of</strong> Intelligence is highly overrated.<br />

Most species do not have very much <strong>of</strong> it. Eighty percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> animal species are arthropods (see invertebrates,<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong>), which do not have high levels <strong>of</strong> intelligence<br />

and show no evolutionary trend toward increasing it.<br />

High levels <strong>of</strong> intelligence evolved in the few species that do<br />

have it as a result <strong>of</strong> special circumstances that are still not<br />

understood.<br />

Intelligence has proven impossible to define in a manner<br />

that all scientists can accept. If intelligence requires only a<br />

coordinated response to complex environmental factors, then<br />

plants have intelligence, as explained in the article by biologist<br />

Anthony Trewavas. Most scientists restrict the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

intelligence to animals, which have nervous systems. Human<br />

intelligence, evolution <strong>of</strong> 0<br />

intelligence includes consciousness, self-awareness, and the<br />

ability to form abstract concepts. <strong>Evolution</strong>ary scientists recognize<br />

a whole range <strong>of</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> animal intelligence.<br />

There are evolutionary reasons why intelligence has<br />

evolved only in animals. Microbes and protists (see archaebacteria;<br />

bacteria, evolution <strong>of</strong>; eukaryotes, evolution<br />

<strong>of</strong>) could not have evolved intelligence, since they are<br />

primarily single-celled. Plants and fungi could not evolve<br />

intelligence, which requires a nervous system for the acquisition,<br />

processing, and storage <strong>of</strong> information.<br />

In some groups <strong>of</strong> animals, such as the arthropods,<br />

a large body size and therefore a brain as large as that <strong>of</strong> a<br />

human is unlikely to evolve. But in many other animal lineages,<br />

intelligence could have evolved if it had provided a<br />

significant fitness advantage (see natural selection). The<br />

fact that high levels <strong>of</strong> intelligence have evolved so seldom<br />

during the history <strong>of</strong> animal life on Earth suggests that the<br />

circumstances that favor intelligence are rare. Therefore, as<br />

evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould (see Gould, Stephen<br />

Jay) pointed out, if complex life were to evolve all over<br />

again, it is unlikely that a human level <strong>of</strong> intelligence would<br />

evolve. Furthermore, science fiction notwithstanding, scientists<br />

should not expect to find highly intelligent life on every<br />

planet that is capable <strong>of</strong> supporting complex life. Gould<br />

strongly rejected the idea that structurally simpler organisms<br />

are evolving toward higher intelligence (see progress, concept<br />

<strong>of</strong>).<br />

High levels <strong>of</strong> intelligence require big brains, and big<br />

brains are very expensive. The human brain consumes a tremendous<br />

share <strong>of</strong> the food and oxygen that is available in<br />

the blood. Humans have an encephalization quotient, which<br />

compares human brain size with that <strong>of</strong> an average mammal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same size, <strong>of</strong> about 6. The encephalization quotient <strong>of</strong><br />

humans compared to other primates is about 3 (see allometry).<br />

Big brains, and high intelligence, are simply not worth<br />

the cost for most animal species.<br />

Biologists use the encephalization quotient rather than<br />

absolute brain size to compare animal species because brain<br />

size is correlated with body size. Big animals require bigger<br />

brains because their larger bodies have more sensory information<br />

to process (particularly the internal sensory information<br />

that informs the brain what is happening inside the body) and<br />

more muscles to control. In fact, beyond a certain size limit,<br />

centralized nervous control <strong>of</strong> a body may be biologically<br />

impossible. The largest dinosaurs appear to have had a somewhat<br />

large brain in their heads, that processed information<br />

to and from the front end, and a smaller swelling <strong>of</strong> the spinal<br />

cord near their tails, which processed information to and<br />

from the rear end. Nerve transmissions are rapid (particularly<br />

in nerve cells, or gray matter, that have fatty sheaths, or white<br />

matter) but apparently not rapid enough for the head end <strong>of</strong><br />

the dinosaur to take full control <strong>of</strong> the entire body.<br />

Intelligence is not perfectly correlated with brain size.<br />

Within the size range <strong>of</strong> the modern human brain, from about<br />

80 to over 120 cubic inches (1,200 to 2,000 cc), there appears<br />

to be no correlation between brain size and intelligence. Men<br />

have larger brains than women, on the average, but are also<br />

larger than women. Even when differences <strong>of</strong> body size are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!