Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Encyclopedia of Evolution.pdf - Online Reading Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
0 biogeography<br />
Another problem with estimating biodiversity is the definition<br />
<strong>of</strong> species. Traditionally, biologists have classified organisms<br />
into the same species if they look the same. Most biologists<br />
now use the biological species concept, which defines species as<br />
populations that are reproductively isolated, that is, they cannot<br />
interbreed, even if they should be brought in contact with one<br />
another. Sometimes such biologically defined species may look<br />
the same to human observers, but they do not act the same in<br />
response to one another. The biological species concept is the<br />
preferred method because it allows the organisms themselves<br />
to indicate their distinctions. Each species represents a group <strong>of</strong><br />
genes that are well-adapted to work together; hybrids between<br />
two species are frequently inferior in their fitness, since the two<br />
sets <strong>of</strong> genes do not work well together. Natural selection favors<br />
the isolation <strong>of</strong> species from one another (see speciation).<br />
Reproductive isolation is not perfect. Interspecific hybrids are<br />
common; for example, many oak species are capable <strong>of</strong> interbreeding.<br />
Intergeneric hybrids are not unknown (for example,<br />
between mustards <strong>of</strong> the genus Brassica and radishes <strong>of</strong> the<br />
genus Raphanus, forming the hybrid genus Raphanobrassica)<br />
(see hybridization). However, hybrids are not as common<br />
as the species that produced them. Species distinctions, while<br />
imperfect, remain recognizable.<br />
Regardless <strong>of</strong> how species are defined, and how many<br />
species there are, human activity is rapidly destroying many<br />
thousands <strong>of</strong> them. These species may, or may not, be valuable<br />
to their ecological communities or to the human economy,<br />
and humans destroy them before finding out. The<br />
current rate <strong>of</strong> destruction far exceeds the ability <strong>of</strong> evolution<br />
to replace them. Humans destroy what they do not know and<br />
what they do not even know how to know.<br />
Further <strong>Reading</strong><br />
Bascompte, Jordi, et al. “Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate<br />
biodiversity maintenance.” Science 312 (2006): 431–433.<br />
Benton, Michael J. “Diversity, extinction and mass extinction.”<br />
Chap. 6 in When Life Nearly Died: The Greatest Mass Extinction<br />
<strong>of</strong> All Time. London: Thames and Hudson, 2003.<br />
Ertter, Barbara. “Floristic surprises in North America north <strong>of</strong> Mexico.”<br />
Annals <strong>of</strong> the Missouri Botanical Garden 87 (2000): 81–109.<br />
Available online. URL: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/floristic_surprises.html.<br />
Accessed 23 March 2005.<br />
Holt, John G., ed. Bergey’s Manual <strong>of</strong> Systematic Bacteriology. Four<br />
volumes. Baltimore, Md.: Williams and Wilkins, 1984–1989.<br />
Jaramillo, Carlos, et al. “Cenozoic plant diversity in the neotropics.”<br />
Science 311 (2006): 1,893–1,896.<br />
Llamas, Hugo. “All Species Foundation.” Available online. URL:<br />
http://www.all-species.org. Accessed 23 March 2005.<br />
May, Robert M. “How many species?” Philosophical Transactions <strong>of</strong><br />
the Royal Society <strong>of</strong> London Series B 330 (1990): 293–301; 345<br />
(1994): 13–20.<br />
———. “The dimensions <strong>of</strong> life on earth.” In Nature and Human<br />
Society. Washington D.C.: National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, 1998.<br />
Torsvik, V., J. Goksøyr, and F. L. Daae. “High diversity in DNA <strong>of</strong><br />
soil bacteria.” Applied Environmental Microbiology 56 (1990):<br />
782–787.<br />
Ward, Peter, and Alexis Rockman. Future <strong>Evolution</strong>: An Illuminated<br />
History <strong>of</strong> Life to Come. New York: Henry Holt, 2001.<br />
Wilmé, Lucienne, Steven M. Goodman, and Jörg U. Ganzhorn. “Biogeographic<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> Madagascar’s microendemic biota.” Science<br />
312 (2006): 1,063–1,065.<br />
Wilson, Edward O. The Future <strong>of</strong> Life. New York: Vintage, 2003.<br />
———. “The encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> life.” Trends in Ecology and <strong>Evolution</strong><br />
18: 77–80.<br />
biogeography Biogeography is the study <strong>of</strong> diversity through<br />
time and space; the study <strong>of</strong> where organisms live and how they<br />
got there. An understanding <strong>of</strong> biogeography is inseparable<br />
from evolutionary science. In fact, biogeography allowed some<br />
initial insights into the fact that evolution had occurred. In Origin<br />
<strong>of</strong> Species, Darwin noted that major groups <strong>of</strong> animals lived<br />
on certain continents, and not on others that had similar climates,<br />
because they had evolved on those continents (see Darwin,<br />
Charles; origin <strong>of</strong> species [book]). This insight from<br />
biogeography was also valuable to Wallace, who also discovered<br />
natural selection (see Wallace, Alfred Russel). Wallace’s<br />
discovery that the (primarily placental) mammals <strong>of</strong> Asia<br />
were very different from the (primarily marsupial) mammals <strong>of</strong><br />
New Guinea and Australia is still one <strong>of</strong> the best examples <strong>of</strong><br />
evolutionary biogeography (see mammals, evolution <strong>of</strong>).<br />
Biogeography generally does not deal with the effects <strong>of</strong><br />
global climatic alterations (for example, the buildup <strong>of</strong> oxygen<br />
in the atmosphere during Precambrian time), however important<br />
they have been in evolution. Instead, it deals with events<br />
and forces that have created geographic patterns. Probably the<br />
biggest process that has affected biogeography over the history<br />
<strong>of</strong> life on Earth has been continental drift. Continents have<br />
moved, coalesced into supercontinents, then split apart in different<br />
clusters. Continental coalescence brought different species<br />
into contact for the first time, allowing coevolution to<br />
produce new species; and subsequent splitting isolated them,<br />
allowing them to pursue separate evolutionary directions (see<br />
speciation). Continental movements are the major explanation<br />
for the biogeographic realms, which have largely separate<br />
sets <strong>of</strong> species. Using the classification system <strong>of</strong> biogeographer<br />
E. C. Pielou, these realms are (see figure on page 51).<br />
• Nearctic (North America)<br />
• Neotropical (Central and South America)<br />
• Palaearctic (Europe and western Asia including Mediterranean<br />
region)<br />
• Ethiopian (Africa south <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean region)<br />
• Oriental (eastern Asia)<br />
• Australasian (Australia and nearby islands)<br />
• Oceanian (Pacific islands)<br />
• Antarctic (Antarctica)<br />
Not only have the continents moved, but mountains<br />
have arisen and subsequently eroded away. Climatic changes<br />
have also created barriers such as deserts between populations<br />
that were once in contact with one another. Mountains<br />
and deserts can separate a population into two or more<br />
populations as surely as can an ocean. When populations<br />
are separated, one species can become many (see adaptive<br />
radiation), and different species can evolve similar adaptations<br />
independently <strong>of</strong> one another in each isolated region<br />
(see convergence).