Untitled - Centrostudirpinia.it

524 GIANTS.
therefore to guess, that the sense of giant/ which we cannot
detect in Him till the 13th century, must nevertheless have lain
in it long before : it is by such double meaning that Hadubrant s
exclamation alter Hun! first acquires significance. When
Gotfried used hiune for giant, he must have known that Hiune
at that time also meant a Hungarian; and as little does the
distinctness of the
nationality rendered Hiini in OHG. glosses
exclude the simultaneous existence of a mythic meaning of the
word. It may have been vivider or fainter in this place or that :
thus, the ON. hunar is never convertible with iotnar and ]?ursar.
I will not touch upon the root here (conf. p. 529 note), but only
remark that one Eddie name for the bear is hunn, Sn. 179. 222 a
and ace. to Biorn Mn and liunbiorn = catulus ursinus (see Suppl.).
One AS. term for giant is ent, pi. entas : Alfred in his Orosius
p. 48 renders Hercules gigas by Ercol se ent. The poets like
to use the word, where ancient buildings and works are spoken
of: enta geweorc, enta rergeweorc (early work of giants), eald
entegeweoro/ Beow. 3356. 5431. 5554. Cod. exon. 291, 24.
476, 2. So the adj. : entischelm, Beow. 5955 ; Lipsius s glosses
also give eintisc avitus, what dates from the giants days of yore.
Our OHG. entisc antiquus does not agree with this in consonant-
gradation [t should be 2] ; it may have been suggested by the
Latin word, perhaps also by the notion of enti (end) ; another
form is antrisc antiquus (Graff 1, 387), and I would rather asso
ciate it with the Eddie inn aldni iotunn (grandsevns gigas), Seem.
23*46 b 84M89 b . The Bavarian patois has an intensive prefix
enz, enzio (Schmeller , 188), but this may have grown out of the
gen. of end, ent (Schm. 1, 77) ; or may we take this ent- itself in
the sense of monstrous, gigantic, and as an exception to the law
)f consonant-change ? They say both enterisch (Schm. 1, 77) and
enzerisch for monstrous, extraordinary. And was the Enzenlerc,
MS. 2, 10 b a giant s hill ? 1 and is the same root contained in
the proper names Anzo, Enzo, EnzincUnt (Fez, thes. iii. 3, 689 C
Enzawip (Meichelb. 1233.
1305), Enzeman (Ben. 325) ? If
Hunt alluded to Wends and Slavs, we may be allowed to
identify
s with the ancient Antes; as for the Indians, whom Hone
., however, spell it Emise-
)