30.06.2013 Views

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Venkataraman (1997) argues that ...if <strong>entrepreneurship</strong> is to emerge as a legitimate<br />

soc ial science field, it needs to carve out a distinctive domain. It needs to have a<br />

conceptual framework that explains and predicts a set <strong>of</strong> empirical phenomena not<br />

explained b y o<strong>the</strong>r fields [Bennett, 2008, p7].<br />

While some <strong>academic</strong>s e.g. Dery and Toulouse, [1996] see a unified paradigm as sign <strong>of</strong><br />

maturity, or as per Venkataraman ‘a distinctive domain’ is necessary, it could be suggested<br />

that until <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong> gains greater maturity, through a solid epistemological foundation,<br />

along with ontologies that operates more independently from those influenced by o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>discipline</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> prospects at best may be to seeking a better differentiation and awareness<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> positioning <strong>of</strong> current ontologies on <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>’s grids <strong>of</strong> specifications, ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than a unified ontology. This process <strong>of</strong> differentiation may highlight <strong>the</strong> prejudice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

influencing bod ies. While an interdisciplinary role is admirable, any successful <strong>discipline</strong><br />

still must seek to evolve and sustain its own identity. Entrepreneurship as a <strong>discipline</strong><br />

needs <strong>entrepreneurship</strong> as a distinct domain, for its own sake, not for <strong>the</strong> management<br />

<strong>discipline</strong>, not for o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>discipline</strong>s such as economics or sociology, but at <strong>the</strong> same time<br />

acknowledging <strong>the</strong> interdisciplinary support that <strong>the</strong>se provide within <strong>the</strong> prejudices that<br />

<strong>the</strong>se contribute.<br />

2.5.4.11 Filion [1997] <strong>of</strong>fers one set <strong>of</strong> ontologies (or topics) that does seem to be less<br />

prejudiced than <strong>the</strong> ones discussed above.<br />

• Behavioural characteristics <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurs<br />

• Economic and demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> small business<br />

• Entrepreneurship and small business in developing country<br />

• The managerial characteristics <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurs<br />

• The entrepreneurial process<br />

• Venture creation<br />

• Business development<br />

• Risk capital and small business financing<br />

• Business management, recovery and acquisition<br />

• High technology firms<br />

• Strategy and growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entrepreneurial company<br />

• Strategic alliances<br />

• Corporate <strong>entrepreneurship</strong> or intrapreneurship<br />

• Family business<br />

• Self-employment<br />

• Incubators and <strong>entrepreneurship</strong> support systems<br />

• Networks<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!