30.06.2013 Views

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.1 Developing a model <strong>of</strong> discourses and <strong>discipline</strong>s<br />

2.1.1 Ontic states, ontic knowledge, ontologies and <strong>discipline</strong>s.<br />

2.1.2 Discourse – <strong>the</strong> intermediate states<br />

2.1.3 Discip lines – power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> right<br />

2.1.4 Citations and good form<br />

2.1.00 This chapter focuses on <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a model to illustrate <strong>the</strong> differences<br />

between ontic states, discourses (discursive states) and <strong>discipline</strong>s (epistemic states), based<br />

on <strong>the</strong> varying de gree <strong>of</strong> conceptualisation or contextua lisation <strong>of</strong> knowledge. The<br />

taxonomy used in this dissertation and more particularly <strong>the</strong> inter-relationship between <strong>the</strong><br />

elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxonomy is illustrated graphically. A model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nesting <strong>of</strong> knowledge is<br />

developed where <strong>discipline</strong>s are nested within discourses which in turn are nested within<br />

ontic states. What is stressed is that epistemology is <strong>the</strong> contextualisation <strong>of</strong> ontological<br />

dom ains within <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>, whereas in <strong>the</strong> discourse <strong>the</strong>re is ‘an account <strong>of</strong>’ by way <strong>of</strong> a<br />

‘-logy’ <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationships that manifest <strong>the</strong>mselves in <strong>the</strong> discourse. The ontic state is a<br />

larger less-defined mass that can conceivably contain lost knowledge as well as knowledge<br />

that has not yet been accounted nor included in a ‘-logy’.<br />

2.1.1 Ontic states, ontic knowledge, ontologies and <strong>discipline</strong>s.<br />

2.1.1.00 This section clarifies <strong>the</strong> difference between ontic states and ontology and uses<br />

<strong>the</strong> entity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ontic state to work towards defining <strong>the</strong> entity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>, as an<br />

epistemic state.<br />

2.1.1.01 Heidegger uses <strong>the</strong> terms “logical, ontological and ontical” [Heidegger, 2002,<br />

p162] in order to try to de fine <strong>the</strong> various entities <strong>of</strong> knowledge. However, while he ties<br />

logic to truth and takes it out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> metaphysical realm <strong>of</strong> ontology, he fails to clearly<br />

define <strong>the</strong> difference between ontical and ontological.<br />

2.1.1.02 For a better idea <strong>of</strong> what is ontical, I refer to Primas’ discussion on ontic states.<br />

Ontic states describe all properties <strong>of</strong> a physical system exhaustively.<br />

(“Exhaustive” in this context means that an ontic state is “precisely <strong>the</strong> way it is”,<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!