30.06.2013 Views

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

some one decides in a planned manner, as per <strong>the</strong> assessment approach (Azjen's [1994]<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> planned behaviour), to start being entrepreneurial and / or is influenced by an<br />

event, as in Shapero's [1975] ‘entrepreneurial event’. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore <strong>the</strong> process approaches<br />

start to introduce a dynamic perspective <strong>of</strong> time, which <strong>the</strong> schools <strong>of</strong> thought micro and<br />

macro approaches seem to lack, providing a more static perspective. The lack <strong>of</strong> references<br />

to <strong>the</strong>se process approaches does tend to suggest that <strong>the</strong>y are not in <strong>the</strong> mainstream <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>academic</strong> thought regarding <strong>entrepreneurship</strong>.<br />

4.2.2 Trying Mintzberg’s approach<br />

4.2.2.00 Mintzbe rg, Ahlstrand, and Lampel [1998] developed a ‘schools <strong>of</strong> thought’<br />

model to strategic management. In this section I discuss my efforts to apply this same<br />

model to <strong>entrepreneurship</strong>.<br />

4.2.2.01 Mintzberg, Ahlstrand, and Lampel’s [1998] mode l comprises 10 ‘schools <strong>of</strong><br />

thought’ approaches to strategy: Design, Planning, Positioning, Entrepreneurial, Cognitive,<br />

Learning, Power, Culture, Environment and Configuration. It seemed that it could be<br />

pos sible to apply <strong>the</strong> same approaches to <strong>entrepreneurship</strong>. Indeed, when it came to<br />

applying this to illustrating sub-<strong>aliran</strong> it worked well - for a while.<br />

4.2.2.02 For <strong>the</strong> strategy linked articles in <strong>the</strong> <strong>aliran</strong>, it was not a prob lem. There were<br />

obvious links with articles by: Simon and March to cognitive; Potter to positioning;<br />

Schumpeter to environment; Weick, Prahalad and Hamel to learning; and so forth. Then<br />

<strong>the</strong> lines started to blur, March could be placed in both cognitive and learning; Chandler in<br />

both design and configuration. This is probably logical as <strong>the</strong>ir works (or how <strong>the</strong>ir works<br />

are perceived) could be said to cover both approaches to strategy.<br />

4.2.2.03 However, for <strong>the</strong> non-strategy linked articles, applying Mintzberg, Ahlstrand,<br />

and Lampel’s [1998] model for strategy to <strong>entrepreneurship</strong> did not seem to work. A lot <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> ethnic / race articles could be assigned to Culture or Environment, and quite a few<br />

articles could readily be placed into what was becoming a very over-crowded<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!