30.06.2013 Views

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In short, <strong>the</strong>re is a problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regime, <strong>the</strong> politics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientific statement<br />

[p112].<br />

The governing regime <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>, or <strong>the</strong> gatekeepers, restrict episteme and <strong>the</strong><br />

acceptability <strong>of</strong> knowledge into <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>s; Foucault sees suc h restriction as an issue<br />

where discontinuities arise. It is possible that <strong>the</strong> restrictions placed upon <strong>the</strong> episteme by<br />

<strong>the</strong> gatekeepers keep out knowledge that ‘should’ be part <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>. Somehow when<br />

this knowledge is eventually accepted it causes a sudden change in <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong> –<br />

something akin to Schumpeter’s ‘clusters’ <strong>of</strong> innovations.<br />

2.3.1.02 In section 2.2.3.07 <strong>the</strong> issue was raised <strong>of</strong> an author having a high level <strong>of</strong><br />

gravitas being able to have articles accepted by <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>. The implication was that<br />

this acceptance was due to <strong>the</strong> high level <strong>of</strong> gravitas and that a similar submission by an<br />

aut hor with lesser gravitas might not have had <strong>the</strong>ir work accepted. This was also<br />

mentioned by Judge et al [2007], cited in section 2.1.4.03 above. In section 2.1.3.06 <strong>the</strong><br />

metal pendulum was used to describe <strong>the</strong> possible movement between Right and Truth<br />

Effects that could delineate <strong>the</strong> boundary between discourse and <strong>discipline</strong>. The two ideas<br />

are connected in that <strong>the</strong> acceptance by <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong> <strong>of</strong> this, previously unaccepted,<br />

knowledge moves <strong>the</strong> pendulum and accordingly <strong>the</strong> boundary between <strong>discipline</strong> and<br />

discourse expands outwards, enlargening <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>. This movement is due to <strong>the</strong> force<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gravitas magnetically pulling on <strong>the</strong> pendulum, thus figuratively expanding <strong>the</strong><br />

boundary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>. Exclusionary resistance, from <strong>the</strong> gatekeepers, is a countering<br />

force.<br />

2.3.1.03 It was <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Leibniz in <strong>the</strong> seventeenth century who applied <strong>the</strong> emerging<br />

laws <strong>of</strong> physics to laws <strong>of</strong> metaphysics.<br />

The distinction be tween force and quantity <strong>of</strong> mot ion, is ra<strong>the</strong>r impor tant, not onl y<br />

in physics and mechanics, in order to find <strong>the</strong> true laws <strong>of</strong> nature and rules <strong>of</strong><br />

motion ….. , but also in metaphysics, in order to understand <strong>the</strong> principles better<br />

[Leibniz, 1991, p 20].<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!