Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

from a process study, Management Science, 28, 1349-1364. Burgelman, R. [1984]. Designs for corporate entrepreneurship in established firms California Management Review, 26, 154-166. Burgelman, R. and Sayres, L. [1986]. Inside corporate innovation: Strategy, structure, and managerial skills. Free Press, New York Burns, T. and Stalke r, G. [1961]. The management of innovation. Tavistock, London. Carland, J., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. and Carland, J. [1984]. Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354-359. Carton, R. Hofer, C. and Meeks, M. [1998]. The entrepreneur and entrepreneurship: Operational definitions of their role in society. Paper presented at the annual International Council for Small Business conference, Singapore. Downloaded 2007. www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/icsb/1998/pdf/32.pdf. Chandler, A. [1962]. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. M.I.T. Press, C ambridge. Chomsky, N. and Foucault, M. [2006]. The Chomsky – Foucault debate on human nature. The New Press, New York. Christensen, C. [2003]. The innovator’s dilemma. Harper, New York. Clark, J. [2000]. Balancing qualitative & quantitative methodology in health services research: How can qualitative research methods best complement administrative data analysis? Downloaded 2008. http://www.nswphc.unsw.edu.a u/pd f/ShortCourseResMetJul06/PPts/MixedMethod sresources.pdf . Coase, R. [1937]. The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series, 4(16), 386-405. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. [1990]. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152. Collins, O. and Moore, D. [1964]. The enterprising man. East Lansing, M ichigan. Companys, Y. and McMullen, J. [2007]. Strategic entrepreneurs at work: The nature, discovery, and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Small Business Economics 28, 301–322. Cooke, P. [2004]. Regional knowledge capabilities, embeddedness of firms and industry 250
organisation: Bioscience megacentres and economic geography. European Planning Studies, 12(5), 625 – 641. Covin, J. and Slevin, D. [1986]. The development and testing of an organizational-level entrepreneurship scale. In Ronstadt, R., Homada y, J. Peterson, R and Vesper, K. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Babson College, Wellesley. Covin, J. and Slevin, D. [1988]. The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 217-234. Dery, R. and Toulouse, J. [1996]. Social structuration of the field of entrepreneurship: A case study. Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 13(4), 285-305. Desman, R. [1999)]. Enterprising persons: the sociopathology of entrepreneurs and professional criminals. Proceedings of the 44th ICSB World Conference, Naples, Italy. Downloaded 2008. www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/icsb/1999/63.pdf. Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P. [1983]. Michael Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Dubini, P. [1988]. Which venture capital backed entrepreneurs have the best chances of succeeding? Journal of Business Venturing, 4, 123–132. Drucker, P. [1984]. Innovation and entrepreneurship. Harper, New York. Echols, J. and Shadily, H. [1994]. Kamus Indonesia – Inggris: An Indonesian-English dictionary. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Eisenhardt, K. [1989]. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Eisenhardt, K. and Schoonhoven, C. [1990]. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. s emiconductor ve ntures, 1978–1988, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504–529. Etzko witz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. [2000]. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-23. Evans, D. and Leighton, L. [1989]. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79(3), 519-35. Filion, L. [1997]. From entrepreneurship to entreprenology. Downloaded 2006. http://www.greenwich.ac.uk/schools/business/entrepreneur/Resources/From%20En trepreneurship%20to%20Entreprenology.pdf. 251
Page 1:
Mapp ing the aliran of the academic
Page 4 and 5:
2.5.2.1 Adolescent angst and acne 8
Page 6 and 7:
Tables of Graphics Table of Graphic
Page 8 and 9:
Attestation of Authorship I hereby
Page 10 and 11:
Gravitas The concept of gravitas im
Page 12 and 13:
Abstract In this study, I consider
Page 14 and 15:
others), this finding should not be
Page 16 and 17:
ehabilitated version of prejudice.
Page 18 and 19:
1.1.1.03 The discipline’s influen
Page 20 and 21:
The suggestion herein is that merel
Page 22 and 23:
Nietzsche it comes to Foucault’s
Page 24 and 25:
introduced in the next section). I
Page 26 and 27:
1.2.03 This structure of this chapt
Page 28 and 29:
1.2.1.07 In this dissertation I am
Page 30 and 31:
1.2.3.01 Taking a n alternative int
Page 32 and 33:
1.3 Positionality 1.3.00 By conduct
Page 34 and 35:
dominate our world” [Rabinow, 199
Page 36 and 37:
1.4 Structure of this dissertation
Page 38 and 39:
arise if the construction of the di
Page 40 and 41:
without any reference to epistemic
Page 42 and 43:
2.1.1.06 The difference between an
Page 44 and 45:
2.1.1.11 Smith [2003], comments tha
Page 46 and 47:
2.1.2.03 Husserl used the term ‘i
Page 48 and 49:
2.1.2.12 However I believe that it
Page 50 and 51:
truth. ….. My problem is roughly
Page 52 and 53:
The division between true and false
Page 54 and 55:
have become a tool used in the exer
Page 56 and 57:
2.1.4.05 Conformity to form is a in
Page 58 and 59:
ejecting or accepting articles for
Page 60 and 61:
Graphic 2c Foucault’s Triangle -
Page 62 and 63:
[Foucault, 1980, p93]. If for some
Page 64 and 65:
2.2.2.03 External to bot h the disc
Page 66 and 67:
Foucault’s eventual reply to Gros
Page 68 and 69:
Graphic 2d Model B - Depicting four
Page 70 and 71:
In short, there is a problem of the
Page 72 and 73:
Graphic 2e Model B - Including effe
Page 74 and 75:
2.3.2.03 In Model B in Graphic 2e t
Page 76 and 77:
While Foucault [2004] does, in The
Page 78 and 79:
2.3.3.10 Given Leibniz’s ideas on
Page 80 and 81:
2.4 Ontologies 2.4.1 Ontologies as
Page 82 and 83:
ontologies, without such a simplist
Page 84 and 85:
of the epistemology followed, e.g.
Page 86 and 87:
thematic conceptualisation, or as p
Page 88 and 89:
Graphic 2i Model H3 - Showing the l
Page 90 and 91:
does discuss the various failings o
Page 92 and 93:
primary power have, a tertiary powe
Page 94 and 95:
2.5. Analysing the Discipline of En
Page 96 and 97:
• being apparent in the perceived
Page 98 and 99:
mass and it would appear that it wa
Page 100 and 101:
Later in 2001, Low suggested the em
Page 102 and 103:
2.5.2.2.06 O’Connor, Cherry and B
Page 104 and 105:
compared with overall trends struct
Page 106 and 107:
for each has also been dependent up
Page 108 and 109:
of clear segregation or differentia
Page 110 and 111:
2.5.3.08 Sciascia and De Vita [2004
Page 112 and 113:
articles that show a predominance o
Page 114 and 115:
structure to the episteme of manage
Page 116 and 117:
Venkataraman (1997) argues that ...
Page 118 and 119:
is being discussed is epistemically
Page 120 and 121:
discourse-objects as discussed in s
Page 122 and 123:
delimitations. Yet Foucault also of
Page 124 and 125:
3.1 Methodology 3.1.1 Position Stat
Page 126 and 127:
collection process which provided a
Page 128 and 129:
in ‘horses for courses’ or, to
Page 130 and 131:
work. However, it may be that for a
Page 132 and 133:
Philosophy ….. does not consist i
Page 134 and 135:
could be termed cross or inter-disc
Page 136 and 137:
3.2 Data Collection Processes / Met
Page 138 and 139:
3.2.1.05 However, a closer look at
Page 140 and 141:
Graphic 3a Bar chart of numbers of
Page 142 and 143:
collective 13,000 citations accordi
Page 144 and 145:
chronological sequence. This gave a
Page 146 and 147:
3.2.3.02 b. 3.2.3.04 Graphic 3f is
Page 148 and 149:
e) Some dual or more articles by on
Page 150 and 151:
Mintzberg, Ahlstrand, and Lampel [1
Page 152 and 153:
Part Four: Empirics 4.1 Interpretat
Page 154 and 155:
4.1.1.02 The first interesting prel
Page 156 and 157:
number of mis-spellings and errors
Page 158 and 159:
Vo lu me: 34 Issue: 1 1956 20. Jour
Page 160 and 161:
4.1.3.02 The top 21 journals listed
Page 162 and 163:
various journals in Graphic 4a, whi
Page 164 and 165:
4.1.4.01 One important piece of val
Page 166 and 167:
epresentationality of the disciplin
Page 168 and 169:
4.2.1.02 Yet for ‘a rich field of
Page 170 and 171:
some one decides in a planned manne
Page 172 and 173:
4.2.3.03 I developed eight expressi
Page 174 and 175:
Graphic Eight expressions of what
Page 176 and 177:
4.3 The 87,060 aliran of entreprene
Page 178 and 179:
in France in the 18 th and 19 th ce
Page 180 and 181:
said that the seeds of genesis for
Page 182 and 183:
develop ment of the discipline. Inn
Page 184 and 185:
4.3.4 Behaviouralism and methodolog
Page 186 and 187:
4.3.5 Innovation sub-aliran - a nat
Page 188 and 189:
provided by Teece. A slightly diffe
Page 190 and 191:
innovation being correlated to a fi
Page 192 and 193:
Graphic 4m Zahra’s influence on t
Page 194 and 195:
4.3.6.2 New Ventures and Corporate
Page 196 and 197:
Grousbeck VENTURE entrepreneur: TSA
Page 198 and 199:
construct a greater corporate orien
Page 200 and 201:
4.3.6.3.01 In section 2.5.1.05 I di
Page 202 and 203:
governance of venture capital or ga
Page 204 and 205:
limited. Senge’s [1990] (20) text
Page 206 and 207:
narrower orientation of the firm or
Page 208 and 209:
on learning by ‘the firm’ where
Page 210 and 211:
ut also the degree of ‘being entr
Page 212 and 213:
Graphic 4s The small business sub-a
Page 214 and 215: Graphic 4t LIGHT 1979 BORJAS 1986 R
Page 216 and 217: 4.3.10 Ethnic / immigrant sub-alira
Page 218 and 219: ZHOU 1992 LIGHT 1995 PORTES 1995 BA
Page 220 and 221: entrepreneurship is not defined by
Page 222 and 223: Barney, 2004; Hitt, Ireland, Camp &
Page 224 and 225: 4.3.11.07 The reason that the strat
Page 226 and 227: individual domains, thus bringing i
Page 228 and 229: entrepreneur to the firm, while Cha
Page 230 and 231: • A greater emphasis between new-
Page 232 and 233: 5.1.09 A fascinating aspect of this
Page 234 and 235: Graphic 5b Three dimensional positi
Page 236 and 237: study (addressing the introverted a
Page 238 and 239: the discipline is indeed dubious ma
Page 240 and 241: 5.3.03 What has fur ther emerged fr
Page 242 and 243: 1995 INNOVATIO N KUHN 1962 - 1996 S
Page 244 and 245: DEVRIES 1977 J MANAGE STUD, V14 JN
Page 246 and 247: COHEN Cohen,West, Aiken 1983 BUS RE
Page 248 and 249: WALDINGER 1986 - 1988 CAPITALIS M E
Page 250 and 251: DOSI 1988 DUBINI 1988 DUNNE Roberts
Page 252 and 253: CHANDLER Takashi 1990 COHEN Leventh
Page 254 and 255: KALLEBERG Leicht 1991 ACAD MANAGE J
Page 256 and 257: HORNSBY JAFFE Naffziger, Kuratko, M
Page 258 and 259: PALICH Bagby 1995 J BUS VENTURING ,
Page 260 and 261: LANE Lyles, Salk 1998 MARKETIN G, V
Page 262 and 263: References Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D
Page 266 and 267: Foss, N., Klein, P., Kor, Y. and Ma
Page 268 and 269: Hisrich, R. and Peters, M. [1998].
Page 270 and 271: Light, I. [1972]. Ethnic enterprise
Page 272 and 273: Mulhall, S. [2005]. Routledge philo
Page 274 and 275: Senge, P. [1990]. The fifth discipl
Page 276: Inc., Indianapolis. Weber, M. [1992
show all

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?