Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

2.5.2.1 Adolescent angst and acne 85
2.5.2.3 Epistemologies - what Foucault missed 89
2.5.3 The authorities of delimitations – epistemic practices 93
2.5.4 Analysing the grids of specification – ontology and pr ejudice 98
2.5.5 Refining the issue of the investigation 103
Part Three: Methodology a nd methods 109
3.1 Methodology 110
3.1.1 Position statement 110
3.1.2 Foucauldian discourse analysis? 114
3.1.3 Phenomenology and hermeneutics 116
3.1.4 Mixed theories – justifying t he line age used 117
3.1.5 Time, three dimensionality and application issues 119
3.2 Data Collection Processes 122
3.2.1 The Web of Science episteme 122
3.2.2 Data collection processes – applying phenomenology 125
3.2.3 Analysis techniques and table layout 128
3.2.4 Problems encountered 133
3.2.5 Hermeneutics – de velop ing the aliran 134
Part Four: Empirics 138
4.1 Interpretation – Journals from the episteme 139
4.1.1 Preliminary observations 139
4.1.2 Double redundancy in my data collection process 141
4.1.3 Data collection summary – the 2,161 portal 145
4.1.4 Suggestions for ontologies 149
4.2 Searching for the ontology of entrepreneurship 153
4.2.1 Domains of reality and themes 153
4.2.2 Trying Mintzberg’s approach 156
4.2.3 Formal concepts analysis – developing the heffalump 157
4.3 The 87,060 aliran on entrepr eneurship 162
4.3.1 Pinpointing the emergence 163
4.3.2 From discourse to discipline 165
4.3.3 Social entrepreneurship – Barth's forgotten branch 168
4.3.4 Behaviouralism and methodologies 170
4.3.5 Innovation sub-aliran – a natural development 172
4.3.6 O ntological commitment and constructions 176
4.3.6.1 Corporate entrepreneuring sub-aliran 177
4.3.6.2 New Ventures and Corporate Ventur ing sub-aliran 180
4.3.6.3 O ntological Commitment? 185
4.3.7 Venture capital sub-aliran – where connaissance meets
savoir 187
iv