Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Senge, P. [1990]. The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency, New York. Shane, S. [1997]. Who is publishing the entrepreneurship research? Journal of Management, 23(1), 83–95. Shane, S. [2001]. Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science, 47(9), 1173-1190. Shane, S. and Cable, D. [2002]. Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new vent ures. Management Science, 48(3), 364-381. Shane, S., and Venkataraman, S. [2000]. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 2, 217–226. Shapero, A. [1975] The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur, Psychology Today, 8, 83- 88. Smith, A. [1999]. The wealth of nations: Books I-III. Penguin, London. Smith, A. [1999]. The wealth of nations: Books IV-V. Penguin, London. Smith, B. [2003]. Ontology. In Floridi, L. (Ed.), Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information, Blackwell, Oxford. Smith, N. and Miner, J. [1983]. Type of entrepreneur, type of firm, and managerial motivation: Implications for organizational life cycle theory Strategic Management Journal, 4(4), 325-340. Sowa, J. [1999]. Knowledge representation: Logical, philosophical, and computational Foundations. Brooks Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CA. Downloaded 2007. www.jfsowa.com/krbook/inde x.htm. Stewart, W., Watson, W. and Garland, J. [1999]. A proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(2), 189-214. Steyaert, C. [2005]. Entrepreneurship: In between what? On the “frontier” as a discourse of entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2, 2-16. Steyaert, C. and Katz, J. [2004]. Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: Geographical, discursive and social dimensions. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, May, 179-196. 260
Stopford, J. and Baden-Fuller, C. [1994]. Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 521-536. Stuart, R. and Abetti, P. [1987]. Start-up vent ures: Towards the prediction of initial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 215-230. Surowiecki, J. [2005]. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few. Abacus. Londo n. Teece, D. [1986]. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collabor ation, licensing and p ublic policy. Research Policy 15, 285-305. Thornton, P. [1999]. The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 19-46. Timmons, J. and Spinelli, S. [2003]. New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21 st century. McGraw Hill, Boston. Tsai, W., MacMillan I. and Low, M. [1991]. Effects of strategy and environment on corporate venture success in industrial markets. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1), 9-28. Tyebjee, T. and Bruno, A. [1984]. A mode l of venture capitalist investment activity Management Science, 30(9), 1051-1066. US Chamber of Commerce. [2006]. Work, entrepreneurship and opportunity in 21 century America. Downloaded 2008. uschamber.com/NR/rdonlyres/.../21st_final.pdf. Van de Ven, A. Hudson, R. and Schroeder, D. [1984]. Designing new business startups: Entrepreneurial, organizational, and ecological considerations. Journal of Management 10(1), 87–107. Vesper, K. [1979]. New venture strategies. University of Washington, Washington. Virtanen, M. [1997]. The role of different theories in explaining entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the USASBE Annual National Conference, San Francisco, Ca. 1997. Downloaded 2007. www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/icsb/1997/pdf/09.pdf. Von Hippel, E. [1988]. The sources of innovation. Downloaded 2007. http://web.mit.edu/evhippe l/www/sources.htm. Wallerstein, I. [2004]. The uncertainties of knowledge. Temple University Press, Philadelphia. Watson, R. [1998]. The breakdown of Cartesian metaphysics. Hackett Publishing Co st 261
Page 1:
Mapp ing the aliran of the academic
Page 4 and 5:
2.5.2.1 Adolescent angst and acne 8
Page 6 and 7:
Tables of Graphics Table of Graphic
Page 8 and 9:
Attestation of Authorship I hereby
Page 10 and 11:
Gravitas The concept of gravitas im
Page 12 and 13:
Abstract In this study, I consider
Page 14 and 15:
others), this finding should not be
Page 16 and 17:
ehabilitated version of prejudice.
Page 18 and 19:
1.1.1.03 The discipline’s influen
Page 20 and 21:
The suggestion herein is that merel
Page 22 and 23:
Nietzsche it comes to Foucault’s
Page 24 and 25:
introduced in the next section). I
Page 26 and 27:
1.2.03 This structure of this chapt
Page 28 and 29:
1.2.1.07 In this dissertation I am
Page 30 and 31:
1.2.3.01 Taking a n alternative int
Page 32 and 33:
1.3 Positionality 1.3.00 By conduct
Page 34 and 35:
dominate our world” [Rabinow, 199
Page 36 and 37:
1.4 Structure of this dissertation
Page 38 and 39:
arise if the construction of the di
Page 40 and 41:
without any reference to epistemic
Page 42 and 43:
2.1.1.06 The difference between an
Page 44 and 45:
2.1.1.11 Smith [2003], comments tha
Page 46 and 47:
2.1.2.03 Husserl used the term ‘i
Page 48 and 49:
2.1.2.12 However I believe that it
Page 50 and 51:
truth. ….. My problem is roughly
Page 52 and 53:
The division between true and false
Page 54 and 55:
have become a tool used in the exer
Page 56 and 57:
2.1.4.05 Conformity to form is a in
Page 58 and 59:
ejecting or accepting articles for
Page 60 and 61:
Graphic 2c Foucault’s Triangle -
Page 62 and 63:
[Foucault, 1980, p93]. If for some
Page 64 and 65:
2.2.2.03 External to bot h the disc
Page 66 and 67:
Foucault’s eventual reply to Gros
Page 68 and 69:
Graphic 2d Model B - Depicting four
Page 70 and 71:
In short, there is a problem of the
Page 72 and 73:
Graphic 2e Model B - Including effe
Page 74 and 75:
2.3.2.03 In Model B in Graphic 2e t
Page 76 and 77:
While Foucault [2004] does, in The
Page 78 and 79:
2.3.3.10 Given Leibniz’s ideas on
Page 80 and 81:
2.4 Ontologies 2.4.1 Ontologies as
Page 82 and 83:
ontologies, without such a simplist
Page 84 and 85:
of the epistemology followed, e.g.
Page 86 and 87:
thematic conceptualisation, or as p
Page 88 and 89:
Graphic 2i Model H3 - Showing the l
Page 90 and 91:
does discuss the various failings o
Page 92 and 93:
primary power have, a tertiary powe
Page 94 and 95:
2.5. Analysing the Discipline of En
Page 96 and 97:
• being apparent in the perceived
Page 98 and 99:
mass and it would appear that it wa
Page 100 and 101:
Later in 2001, Low suggested the em
Page 102 and 103:
2.5.2.2.06 O’Connor, Cherry and B
Page 104 and 105:
compared with overall trends struct
Page 106 and 107:
for each has also been dependent up
Page 108 and 109:
of clear segregation or differentia
Page 110 and 111:
2.5.3.08 Sciascia and De Vita [2004
Page 112 and 113:
articles that show a predominance o
Page 114 and 115:
structure to the episteme of manage
Page 116 and 117:
Venkataraman (1997) argues that ...
Page 118 and 119:
is being discussed is epistemically
Page 120 and 121:
discourse-objects as discussed in s
Page 122 and 123:
delimitations. Yet Foucault also of
Page 124 and 125:
3.1 Methodology 3.1.1 Position Stat
Page 126 and 127:
collection process which provided a
Page 128 and 129:
in ‘horses for courses’ or, to
Page 130 and 131:
work. However, it may be that for a
Page 132 and 133:
Philosophy ….. does not consist i
Page 134 and 135:
could be termed cross or inter-disc
Page 136 and 137:
3.2 Data Collection Processes / Met
Page 138 and 139:
3.2.1.05 However, a closer look at
Page 140 and 141:
Graphic 3a Bar chart of numbers of
Page 142 and 143:
collective 13,000 citations accordi
Page 144 and 145:
chronological sequence. This gave a
Page 146 and 147:
3.2.3.02 b. 3.2.3.04 Graphic 3f is
Page 148 and 149:
e) Some dual or more articles by on
Page 150 and 151:
Mintzberg, Ahlstrand, and Lampel [1
Page 152 and 153:
Part Four: Empirics 4.1 Interpretat
Page 154 and 155:
4.1.1.02 The first interesting prel
Page 156 and 157:
number of mis-spellings and errors
Page 158 and 159:
Vo lu me: 34 Issue: 1 1956 20. Jour
Page 160 and 161:
4.1.3.02 The top 21 journals listed
Page 162 and 163:
various journals in Graphic 4a, whi
Page 164 and 165:
4.1.4.01 One important piece of val
Page 166 and 167:
epresentationality of the disciplin
Page 168 and 169:
4.2.1.02 Yet for ‘a rich field of
Page 170 and 171:
some one decides in a planned manne
Page 172 and 173:
4.2.3.03 I developed eight expressi
Page 174 and 175:
Graphic Eight expressions of what
Page 176 and 177:
4.3 The 87,060 aliran of entreprene
Page 178 and 179:
in France in the 18 th and 19 th ce
Page 180 and 181:
said that the seeds of genesis for
Page 182 and 183:
develop ment of the discipline. Inn
Page 184 and 185:
4.3.4 Behaviouralism and methodolog
Page 186 and 187:
4.3.5 Innovation sub-aliran - a nat
Page 188 and 189:
provided by Teece. A slightly diffe
Page 190 and 191:
innovation being correlated to a fi
Page 192 and 193:
Graphic 4m Zahra’s influence on t
Page 194 and 195:
4.3.6.2 New Ventures and Corporate
Page 196 and 197:
Grousbeck VENTURE entrepreneur: TSA
Page 198 and 199:
construct a greater corporate orien
Page 200 and 201:
4.3.6.3.01 In section 2.5.1.05 I di
Page 202 and 203:
governance of venture capital or ga
Page 204 and 205:
limited. Senge’s [1990] (20) text
Page 206 and 207:
narrower orientation of the firm or
Page 208 and 209:
on learning by ‘the firm’ where
Page 210 and 211:
ut also the degree of ‘being entr
Page 212 and 213:
Graphic 4s The small business sub-a
Page 214 and 215:
Graphic 4t LIGHT 1979 BORJAS 1986 R
Page 216 and 217:
4.3.10 Ethnic / immigrant sub-alira
Page 218 and 219:
ZHOU 1992 LIGHT 1995 PORTES 1995 BA
Page 220 and 221:
entrepreneurship is not defined by
Page 222 and 223:
Barney, 2004; Hitt, Ireland, Camp &
Page 224 and 225: 4.3.11.07 The reason that the strat
Page 226 and 227: individual domains, thus bringing i
Page 228 and 229: entrepreneur to the firm, while Cha
Page 230 and 231: • A greater emphasis between new-
Page 232 and 233: 5.1.09 A fascinating aspect of this
Page 234 and 235: Graphic 5b Three dimensional positi
Page 236 and 237: study (addressing the introverted a
Page 238 and 239: the discipline is indeed dubious ma
Page 240 and 241: 5.3.03 What has fur ther emerged fr
Page 242 and 243: 1995 INNOVATIO N KUHN 1962 - 1996 S
Page 244 and 245: DEVRIES 1977 J MANAGE STUD, V14 JN
Page 246 and 247: COHEN Cohen,West, Aiken 1983 BUS RE
Page 248 and 249: WALDINGER 1986 - 1988 CAPITALIS M E
Page 250 and 251: DOSI 1988 DUBINI 1988 DUNNE Roberts
Page 252 and 253: CHANDLER Takashi 1990 COHEN Leventh
Page 254 and 255: KALLEBERG Leicht 1991 ACAD MANAGE J
Page 256 and 257: HORNSBY JAFFE Naffziger, Kuratko, M
Page 258 and 259: PALICH Bagby 1995 J BUS VENTURING ,
Page 260 and 261: LANE Lyles, Salk 1998 MARKETIN G, V
Page 262 and 263: References Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D
Page 264 and 265: from a process study, Management Sc
Page 266 and 267: Foss, N., Klein, P., Kor, Y. and Ma
Page 268 and 269: Hisrich, R. and Peters, M. [1998].
Page 270 and 271: Light, I. [1972]. Ethnic enterprise
Page 272 and 273: Mulhall, S. [2005]. Routledge philo
Page 276: Inc., Indianapolis. Weber, M. [1992
show all

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?