- Page 1: Mapp ing the aliran of the academic
- Page 5 and 6: 4.3.8 Organizations, corporations,
- Page 7 and 8: Graphic 4c Detail extracted from Gr
- Page 9 and 10: Glossary Aliran The term aliran fro
- Page 11 and 12: Note on APA referencing style used
- Page 13 and 14: of the discipline based upo n the e
- Page 15 and 16: Part One: Introduction 1.1 Introduc
- Page 17 and 18: 1.1 Introducing the focus of this r
- Page 19 and 20: 1.1.1.06 Kilby [1971] describes the
- Page 21 and 22: 1.1.2 Philosophy 1.1.2.00 What is k
- Page 23 and 24: methodology I have developed could
- Page 25 and 26: 1.2. Epistemology: The theory of kn
- Page 27 and 28: epistemological approaches. While t
- Page 29 and 30: or exclusion is more clearly define
- Page 31 and 32: discipline (especially in regards t
- Page 33 and 34: 1.3.04 This is not to say that I am
- Page 35 and 36: 1.3.11 While later developments in
- Page 37 and 38: Part Two: Theoretical framework for
- Page 39 and 40: 2.1 Developing a model of discourse
- Page 41 and 42: ontology are conceptually applied t
- Page 43 and 44: I assume that the ontology within a
- Page 45 and 46: for an agent or a community of agen
- Page 47 and 48: even though the model in Graphic 2a
- Page 49 and 50: Atmanspacher, 2001] are the same as
- Page 51 and 52: Graphic 2b Foucault’s Triangle -
- Page 53 and 54:
and frontiers, should have emerged
- Page 55 and 56:
quality as expressed by Azar and Br
- Page 57 and 58:
2.1.4.08 Anecdotes are heard, in th
- Page 59 and 60:
2.2 The role of practitioners, inte
- Page 61 and 62:
2.2.1.04 Foucault’s definitions o
- Page 63 and 64:
2.2.2.01 The intellectual has been
- Page 65 and 66:
Dreyfus and Rabinow have described
- Page 67 and 68:
compatibility to this discipline. T
- Page 69 and 70:
2.3 Dynamic aspects of disciplines,
- Page 71 and 72:
2.3.1.04 As much as the physical la
- Page 73 and 74:
2.3.3 under dubious disciplines. Pa
- Page 75 and 76:
one” [Foucault, 1980, p109, also
- Page 77 and 78:
etween academics and practitioners,
- Page 79 and 80:
Graphic 2f Model D - Showing disjun
- Page 81 and 82:
• God is an uncreated substance;
- Page 83 and 84:
the type of epistemic justification
- Page 85 and 86:
Graphic 2g Model H - Depicting the
- Page 87 and 88:
Graphic 2h Model H2 - Showing the d
- Page 89 and 90:
the knowledge that is deemed accept
- Page 91 and 92:
should not imply any lesser status
- Page 93 and 94:
2.4.3.13 The elements of the theory
- Page 95 and 96:
My aim is to uncover the pr inc ipl
- Page 97 and 98:
2.5.2.1.02 This discursive conceptu
- Page 99 and 100:
However the emergence of a discipli
- Page 101 and 102:
successful entrepreneurs, or the ch
- Page 103 and 104:
unhelpful to practice. Much of this
- Page 105 and 106:
discipline as adolescent in 1988, t
- Page 107 and 108:
the processes developed by the indi
- Page 109 and 110:
2.5.3.06 Given the criticism levele
- Page 111 and 112:
entrepreneurship, even at Fabian’
- Page 113 and 114:
2.5.4.01 As discussed abo ve, the c
- Page 115 and 116:
2.5.4.07 The American Marketing Ass
- Page 117 and 118:
• Factors influencing venture cre
- Page 119 and 120:
(discussed in 2.3.3.04). If Foucaul
- Page 121 and 122:
2.5.5.11 In my model, ontology cove
- Page 123 and 124:
Part Three : Methodology and Method
- Page 125 and 126:
Heidegger, and secondly rather than
- Page 127 and 128:
is possible. This is not to say tha
- Page 129 and 130:
of this dissertation would have bee
- Page 131 and 132:
an elephant brings to mind Husserl
- Page 133 and 134:
offered by Schmidt as well as Lawlo
- Page 135 and 136:
qualitative, based pr imarily on my
- Page 137 and 138:
3.2.1.01 Initially I selected the W
- Page 139 and 140:
academic issue. There appeared to b
- Page 141 and 142:
using ‘entrepreneur’ also gave
- Page 143 and 144:
a) Extract the list of 2,161 articl
- Page 145 and 146:
totals of the respective columns as
- Page 147 and 148:
EVANS Jovanovic 1989 VENKATARAMAN 1
- Page 149 and 150:
in the aliran in that the sub-alira
- Page 151 and 152:
of sub-aliran and suitable presenta
- Page 153 and 154:
4.1 Interpretation - Journals from
- Page 155 and 156:
epresentational of a form of peer a
- Page 157 and 158:
Graphic 4a JOURNAL NAME The top twe
- Page 159 and 160:
4.1.2.06 The ‘minor variations in
- Page 161 and 162:
4.1.3.04 It could seem that entrepr
- Page 163 and 164:
Graphic 4d List of journals produce
- Page 165 and 166:
Graphic 4g JOURNA L NAME List of th
- Page 167 and 168:
4.2 Searching for the Ontology of E
- Page 169 and 170:
4.2.1.06 These seemed to suggest so
- Page 171 and 172:
Entrepreneurial school of thought,
- Page 173 and 174:
texts were reviewed in this manner,
- Page 175 and 176:
Graphic 4j My Heffalump - A graphic
- Page 177 and 178:
distinguish between the term ‘cor
- Page 179 and 180:
Barth’s article is a study on soc
- Page 181 and 182:
position that Schumpeter attributed
- Page 183 and 184:
Graphic 4k The aliran articles that
- Page 185 and 186:
Tregidga [2008] “case studies can
- Page 187 and 188:
experience, while probably qualifyi
- Page 189 and 190:
characteristic of the individual en
- Page 191 and 192:
4.3.6.1 Corporate entrepreneuring s
- Page 193 and 194:
upo n connaissance knowledge. ‘Co
- Page 195 and 196:
to place the interstices that curre
- Page 197 and 198:
4.3.6.2.04 Similar research finding
- Page 199 and 200:
and new ventures. While this orient
- Page 201 and 202:
the ‘eligibility to participate a
- Page 203 and 204:
4.3.8 Organizations, corporations,
- Page 205 and 206:
KEATS Hitt 1988 COVIN Slevin 1988 E
- Page 207 and 208:
discussion on the shape of the entr
- Page 209 and 210:
4.3.8.3 Small businesses and entrep
- Page 211 and 212:
Graphic 4r A 2 x 2 matrix depicting
- Page 213 and 214:
4.3.8.3.05 While this section has f
- Page 215 and 216:
immigrant sub-aliran that are discu
- Page 217 and 218:
‘enterprising’ as being more in
- Page 219 and 220:
it a soft target of study. Yao [in
- Page 221 and 222:
Graphic 4w MILLER Friesen 1982 BURG
- Page 223 and 224:
corporate entrepreneurship and stra
- Page 225 and 226:
Graphic 4x Positioning the strategi
- Page 227 and 228:
Part Five: Conclusion 5.1 Reviewing
- Page 229 and 230:
5.1.04 The second significant point
- Page 231 and 232:
Graphic 5a The Heffalump model revi
- Page 233 and 234:
placed into the heffalump mode l as
- Page 235 and 236:
5.2 Can entrepreneurship be conside
- Page 237 and 238:
5.2.08 The ‘being’ of entrepren
- Page 239 and 240:
5.3 Contributions and future resear
- Page 241 and 242:
Appendix One: The high gravitas art
- Page 243 and 244:
MCCLELLAND 1969 HORNADAY Aboud 1971
- Page 245 and 246:
BROCKHAUS 1980 LIEBERSON 1980 MAIDI
- Page 247 and 248:
MILLER Friesen 1984 RACIAL STUD, V7
- Page 249 and 250:
BIRCH 1987 BLAU 1987 DOIG Hargrove
- Page 251 and 252:
DIERICKX Cool 1989 V10 MANAGE SCI,
- Page 253 and 254:
ROM ER 1990 ROURE Keeley 1990 SAHLM
- Page 255 and 256:
LARSON 1992 ADMIN SCI QUART, V37 NA
- Page 257 and 258:
Rosen ECON, V102 LIGHT 1994 HDB EC
- Page 259 and 260:
BATES 1997 BIRKINSHAW 1997 BURT 199
- Page 261 and 262:
PUTNAM 2000 V43 BOWLING ALONE COLLA
- Page 263 and 264:
Bantel, K. and Jackson, S. [1989].
- Page 265 and 266:
organisation: Bioscience megacentre
- Page 267 and 268:
Gartner, W., Bird, B. and Starr, J.
- Page 269 and 270:
Achieving publishing synergies. Pap
- Page 271 and 272:
strategic management. Strategic Man
- Page 273 and 274:
Penguin Books. Redford, D and Trigo
- Page 275 and 276:
Stopford, J. and Baden-Fuller, C. [