Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...
Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...
Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>of</strong> sub-<strong>aliran</strong> and suitable presentation methods. However <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
heffalump described above began to suggest an approach that did not involve slotting<br />
articles into a sub-<strong>aliran</strong> or ontology, that had proved difficult. The representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
heffalump suggested that it may be <strong>the</strong> attempt to slot <strong>the</strong> articles into an ontology that was<br />
problematic, whereas what may be feasible was instead positioning <strong>the</strong> article in<br />
relationship to <strong>the</strong> interstices between <strong>the</strong> ontologies. Given <strong>the</strong> model developed in<br />
Graphic 2h <strong>the</strong> more subjective nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong> meant that <strong>the</strong> ontologies were not<br />
strongly defined and <strong>the</strong> relationship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sub-<strong>aliran</strong> toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> interstices<br />
suggested a different approach. This approach was undertaken and <strong>the</strong> results generated are<br />
discussed in <strong>the</strong> third chapter to <strong>the</strong> following Part Four on Empirics. The method in this<br />
approach involved reviewing <strong>the</strong> 476 texts and articles in <strong>the</strong> <strong>aliran</strong> and is described in<br />
section 4.2.3.06.<br />
3.2.5.08 Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hermeneutic app roach that is developed in Part Four is<br />
determining <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> overt construction in <strong>the</strong> various sub-<strong>aliran</strong> that I am taking to be<br />
<strong>the</strong> ontologies in <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>. As Schmidt [2006, p102] discusses: “The task <strong>of</strong><br />
hermeneutic understanding is to differentiate <strong>the</strong> legitimate prejudices from all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
illegitimate ones that need to be criticized and dropped”. Once I had resolved <strong>the</strong> issues <strong>of</strong><br />
ontological ide nt ification through greater use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interstices <strong>the</strong>n such process <strong>of</strong><br />
differentiation became substantially easier. The heffalump mode l I developed became<br />
something <strong>of</strong> a basis against which such construction could be compared to determine<br />
overt-ness. The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hermeneutic examination, as will be discussed in Part Four,<br />
did reveal some weaknesses in <strong>the</strong> heffalump model that meant that <strong>the</strong> model did need to<br />
be revised. These revisions, as will be discussed in Part Five, did actually contribute to a<br />
greater unde rstanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heffalump mode l and its application to <strong>the</strong><br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>.<br />
137