30.06.2013 Views

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3.3.10 Given Leibniz’s ideas on app lying <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> laws <strong>of</strong> physics on non-physical<br />

items such as ideas, <strong>discipline</strong>s etc we can look a t <strong>discipline</strong>s following physical laws; laws<br />

<strong>of</strong> motion, laws <strong>of</strong> gravity, attraction and so forth. Gravitas gains similar properties to<br />

gravity. The practitioners could be ‘drawn’ (as in a physical attraction) to ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>discipline</strong> that more readily accepts <strong>the</strong> discontinuous experienced by <strong>the</strong> practitioner. It is<br />

this ‘drawing’ that is significant. Entrepreneurs, or nascent entrepreneurs, are not tied to<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>entrepreneurship</strong> and if <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong> is not representational <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> practitioners <strong>the</strong>re is nothing to stop practitioners finding that alternative <strong>discipline</strong>s<br />

display more representationality and compatibility.<br />

2.3.3.11 It is pos sible that practitioners more attracted by ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>discipline</strong> as in Mode l<br />

D in Graphic 2f where ‘Discipline C’ becomes representational <strong>of</strong> Practitioners ‘b'.<br />

‘Discipline C’ may be an emergent <strong>discipline</strong> or may be a relocation <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>discipline</strong>s<br />

such as ‘Discipline A’ or ‘Discipline B’. Somehow <strong>the</strong> savoir knowledges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

practitioner and connaissance knowledges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alternative <strong>discipline</strong> show a better<br />

compatibility? Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> acceptances <strong>of</strong> discontinuities within <strong>the</strong> original<br />

<strong>discipline</strong> have resulted in this movement is a moot question.<br />

2.3.3.12 This investigation will focus on <strong>the</strong> representationality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />

acceptability <strong>of</strong> knowledge into <strong>the</strong> episteme that collectively constitute <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>.<br />

When Foucault [in Dreyfus and Rabinow, 1983, p117] talks about crossing <strong>the</strong> ‘threshold<br />

<strong>of</strong> epistemologization’ I assume in this perspective that this relates to episteme ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

epistemology and, <strong>the</strong>refore, should not be mistaken for epistemic justification. The locus<br />

remains with <strong>the</strong> episteme. A clarification <strong>of</strong> epistemic justification and <strong>the</strong> separation <strong>of</strong><br />

ontology and epistemology is elabor ated in <strong>the</strong> next section 2.4.<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!