Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...
Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...
Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and frontiers, should have emerged at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century, or in<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r words at <strong>the</strong> very time when this disciplinarization <strong>of</strong> knowledges, this<br />
organization <strong>of</strong> knowledges into <strong>discipline</strong>s, was going on [Foucault, 2003a, p183].<br />
2.1.3.11 The process <strong>of</strong> exclusion , in regards to <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>, is more clear in 1976.<br />
The problem is now: Who is speaking, are <strong>the</strong>y qualified to speak, at what level is<br />
<strong>the</strong> statement situated, what set can it be fitted into, and how and to what extent<br />
does it conform to o<strong>the</strong>r forms and typologies <strong>of</strong> knowledge [Foucault, 2003a,<br />
p184].<br />
2.1.3.12 The 1976 exclusions allows for ontological issues, i.e. ‘what set can it be fitted<br />
into’, and <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uni versity-as-<strong>discipline</strong> meant that “a number <strong>of</strong><br />
epistemological obstacles could be removed” [Foucault, 2003b, p184]. This increased<br />
epistemological range conforms to <strong>the</strong> epistemic justification being part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong> as<br />
discussed earlier. The non-secular ‘orthodoxy’ <strong>of</strong> statement that had preceded <strong>the</strong><br />
emergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> university moved to an “orthology” [Foucault, 2003b, p184], (as in a<br />
discourse i.e. -logy) and increasingl y to a “for m <strong>of</strong> control that is now exercised on a<br />
disciplinary basis” [Foucault, 2003b, p184]. The <strong>discipline</strong> has taken a role as displayed in<br />
Model A, shown in Graphic 2a.<br />
2.1.3.13 The 1976 question on qualification posed by Foucault [2003b] <strong>of</strong>: ‘Who is<br />
speaking, are <strong>the</strong>y qualified to speak….?’ relates to <strong>the</strong> third external exclusion and <strong>the</strong><br />
first two internal exclusions expressed by Foucault in 1971. Truth is relative to <strong>the</strong><br />
perceived expertise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> statement. A measure <strong>of</strong> this perceived expertise is<br />
<strong>the</strong> citation and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> citation indexes to quantify this measure. The role <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> acceptability <strong>of</strong> knowledge within <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>, will now be<br />
viewed with regards to citations, practitioners and intellectuals and how <strong>the</strong>se fit into <strong>the</strong><br />
Model A and into Foucault’s Triangle.<br />
2.1.4 Citations and good form - citation indexes.<br />
2.1.4.00 This section discusses <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> citation, as being good form, <strong>the</strong><br />
evolut ion, <strong>the</strong> uses and abuses, and <strong>the</strong> manner in which citations and citation inde xing<br />
39