30.06.2013 Views

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

Mapping the aliran of the academic discipline of entrepreneurship: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and frontiers, should have emerged at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century, or in<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r words at <strong>the</strong> very time when this disciplinarization <strong>of</strong> knowledges, this<br />

organization <strong>of</strong> knowledges into <strong>discipline</strong>s, was going on [Foucault, 2003a, p183].<br />

2.1.3.11 The process <strong>of</strong> exclusion , in regards to <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>, is more clear in 1976.<br />

The problem is now: Who is speaking, are <strong>the</strong>y qualified to speak, at what level is<br />

<strong>the</strong> statement situated, what set can it be fitted into, and how and to what extent<br />

does it conform to o<strong>the</strong>r forms and typologies <strong>of</strong> knowledge [Foucault, 2003a,<br />

p184].<br />

2.1.3.12 The 1976 exclusions allows for ontological issues, i.e. ‘what set can it be fitted<br />

into’, and <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uni versity-as-<strong>discipline</strong> meant that “a number <strong>of</strong><br />

epistemological obstacles could be removed” [Foucault, 2003b, p184]. This increased<br />

epistemological range conforms to <strong>the</strong> epistemic justification being part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong> as<br />

discussed earlier. The non-secular ‘orthodoxy’ <strong>of</strong> statement that had preceded <strong>the</strong><br />

emergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> university moved to an “orthology” [Foucault, 2003b, p184], (as in a<br />

discourse i.e. -logy) and increasingl y to a “for m <strong>of</strong> control that is now exercised on a<br />

disciplinary basis” [Foucault, 2003b, p184]. The <strong>discipline</strong> has taken a role as displayed in<br />

Model A, shown in Graphic 2a.<br />

2.1.3.13 The 1976 question on qualification posed by Foucault [2003b] <strong>of</strong>: ‘Who is<br />

speaking, are <strong>the</strong>y qualified to speak….?’ relates to <strong>the</strong> third external exclusion and <strong>the</strong><br />

first two internal exclusions expressed by Foucault in 1971. Truth is relative to <strong>the</strong><br />

perceived expertise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> statement. A measure <strong>of</strong> this perceived expertise is<br />

<strong>the</strong> citation and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> citation indexes to quantify this measure. The role <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> acceptability <strong>of</strong> knowledge within <strong>the</strong> <strong>discipline</strong>, will now be<br />

viewed with regards to citations, practitioners and intellectuals and how <strong>the</strong>se fit into <strong>the</strong><br />

Model A and into Foucault’s Triangle.<br />

2.1.4 Citations and good form - citation indexes.<br />

2.1.4.00 This section discusses <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> citation, as being good form, <strong>the</strong><br />

evolut ion, <strong>the</strong> uses and abuses, and <strong>the</strong> manner in which citations and citation inde xing<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!