Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
96 4. AKATEK, A `TYPICAL' MAYAN LANGUAGE<br />
nouns and adjectives, and locative and dative adpositions are su xed,<br />
while <strong>verb</strong>al predicates are pre xed. The transitive <strong>verb</strong> can alternatively<br />
also be su xed by set B.<br />
(13)<br />
Pre x Head Su x Dependent<br />
NVP -B NP/PRO/;<br />
LOC/DAT -B NP/PRO/;<br />
B- V<strong>in</strong>tr NP/PRO/;<br />
B- A-Vtr NP/PRO/;<br />
A-Vtr -B NP/PRO/;<br />
The structure and function of pronouns, nouns and <strong>verb</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong><br />
is presented <strong>in</strong> the next section. While pronouns and nouns are optional<br />
constituents of a sentence <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong>, the <strong>verb</strong>al complex is the only<br />
obligatory constituent of the clause.<br />
1.2. Pronouns, nouns and <strong>verb</strong>s. Historically, the pronom<strong>in</strong>al<br />
a xes of set A and set B <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s developed from a xation<br />
of <strong>in</strong>dependent pronouns to the <strong>verb</strong> (Robertson, 1992). As<br />
a result of this a xation, there are no <strong>in</strong>dependent pronouns <strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong> family with the exception of some of the Kanjobalan<br />
<strong>language</strong>s, i.e. Jakaltek, <strong>Akatek</strong>, Chuj and Kanjobal (Craig, 1986).<br />
The syntax of these <strong>language</strong>s shows that they <strong>in</strong>novated third person<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent pronouns from noun classi ers. These pronouns can replace<br />
any lexical NP that has the ability to take a noun classi er. A<br />
noun classi er is a free morpheme preced<strong>in</strong>g a noun that belongs to<br />
one of the classes listed under the head<strong>in</strong>g `Mean<strong>in</strong>g' <strong>in</strong> Table 3. As<br />
shown <strong>in</strong> Table 3, the noun classi ers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong> are clearly derived<br />
from nouns (Zavala, 1992b). The third person pronouns are morphologically<br />
identical to the correspond<strong>in</strong>g noun classi ers, e.g. the<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent pronoun for an animal is no' `it (animal)'. Semantically<br />
these pronouns encode third person as well as semantic features such<br />
as gender, material and consistency. In <strong>Akatek</strong>, the presence of third<br />
person pronouns is optional. The example below illustrates the NCL<br />
no' <strong>in</strong> pronoun function. As a pronoun no' replaces the possessor NP,<br />
an animal that occurred <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g discourse, and follows the<br />
possessed NP smul `his/her/its s<strong>in</strong>'.<br />
(14) tol ey-; s-mul no'<br />
COMP EX-B3 A3-crime PRO:animal<br />
`Because of his (the animal's) crime.'<br />
Penalosa & Say (1992)