05.08.2013 Views

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96 4. AKATEK, A `TYPICAL' MAYAN LANGUAGE<br />

nouns and adjectives, and locative and dative adpositions are su xed,<br />

while <strong>verb</strong>al predicates are pre xed. The transitive <strong>verb</strong> can alternatively<br />

also be su xed by set B.<br />

(13)<br />

Pre x Head Su x Dependent<br />

NVP -B NP/PRO/;<br />

LOC/DAT -B NP/PRO/;<br />

B- V<strong>in</strong>tr NP/PRO/;<br />

B- A-Vtr NP/PRO/;<br />

A-Vtr -B NP/PRO/;<br />

The structure and function of pronouns, nouns and <strong>verb</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong><br />

is presented <strong>in</strong> the next section. While pronouns and nouns are optional<br />

constituents of a sentence <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong>, the <strong>verb</strong>al complex is the only<br />

obligatory constituent of the clause.<br />

1.2. Pronouns, nouns and <strong>verb</strong>s. Historically, the pronom<strong>in</strong>al<br />

a xes of set A and set B <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s developed from a xation<br />

of <strong>in</strong>dependent pronouns to the <strong>verb</strong> (Robertson, 1992). As<br />

a result of this a xation, there are no <strong>in</strong>dependent pronouns <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong> family with the exception of some of the Kanjobalan<br />

<strong>language</strong>s, i.e. Jakaltek, <strong>Akatek</strong>, Chuj and Kanjobal (Craig, 1986).<br />

The syntax of these <strong>language</strong>s shows that they <strong>in</strong>novated third person<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent pronouns from noun classi ers. These pronouns can replace<br />

any lexical NP that has the ability to take a noun classi er. A<br />

noun classi er is a free morpheme preced<strong>in</strong>g a noun that belongs to<br />

one of the classes listed under the head<strong>in</strong>g `Mean<strong>in</strong>g' <strong>in</strong> Table 3. As<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> Table 3, the noun classi ers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong> are clearly derived<br />

from nouns (Zavala, 1992b). The third person pronouns are morphologically<br />

identical to the correspond<strong>in</strong>g noun classi ers, e.g. the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent pronoun for an animal is no' `it (animal)'. Semantically<br />

these pronouns encode third person as well as semantic features such<br />

as gender, material and consistency. In <strong>Akatek</strong>, the presence of third<br />

person pronouns is optional. The example below illustrates the NCL<br />

no' <strong>in</strong> pronoun function. As a pronoun no' replaces the possessor NP,<br />

an animal that occurred <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g discourse, and follows the<br />

possessed NP smul `his/her/its s<strong>in</strong>'.<br />

(14) tol ey-; s-mul no'<br />

COMP EX-B3 A3-crime PRO:animal<br />

`Because of his (the animal's) crime.'<br />

Penalosa & Say (1992)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!