Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
226 6. TYPOLOGY OF PERCEPTION VERB COMPLEMENTS<br />
a universal. This cognitive extension is a prerequisite for the occurrence<br />
of proposition denot<strong>in</strong>g PVC types. Furthermore, I took <strong>in</strong>to<br />
consideration clues provided by the PVC predicate (e.g. whether it expresses<br />
someth<strong>in</strong>g perceptible or not, or whether it describes a process<br />
as opposed to a state) and from the translation. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the results<br />
regard<strong>in</strong>g PVC types and their semantic <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>in</strong> English and<br />
<strong>Akatek</strong> (see Table 1), along with Correlations 1 and 2, which are repeated<br />
here for ease of reference from chapter 2, constituted a means to<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>guish event denot<strong>in</strong>g from proposition denot<strong>in</strong>g PVC types.<br />
Table 1. English and <strong>Akatek</strong> PVC systems<br />
Complement English <strong>Akatek</strong> Semantic<br />
types PVCs PVCs types<br />
IND that-PVC type1 (tzub'il) proposition (event)<br />
SUB | type1 (tol) proposition (event)<br />
INF to-PVC | proposition<br />
INF NI-PVC | event<br />
INF <strong>in</strong>g-PVC | event<br />
NMLZ PNOM type2 event<br />
(1) Correlation 1<br />
If the event denot<strong>in</strong>g PVC has a complementizer, then the<br />
proposition denot<strong>in</strong>g PVC also has a complementizer.<br />
(2) Correlation 2<br />
a. If a nite/ <strong>in</strong>dependentPVC denotes events, then a nite/<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent PVC also denotes propositions.<br />
b. If a non- nite/ dependent PVC denotes propositions,<br />
then a non- nite/ dependent PVC also denotes events.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>vestigation of di erent complement types for event denot<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and proposition denot<strong>in</strong>g PVCs <strong>in</strong> sections 2 and 3 is based on the<br />
typology of complementation presented <strong>in</strong> chapter 2. The complement<br />
types of this typology are reviewed <strong>in</strong> section 1. Languages <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />
<strong>in</strong> this chapter are Cayuga, Mohawk, Nez Perce, Japanese,<br />
Cambodian, Fijian, Malagasy, Russian, Modern Greek, the Albanian<br />
dialect Arberesh, Romance <strong>language</strong>s (French, Italian and Spanish),<br />
and German.<br />
1. PVC types<br />
The typology of complementation presented <strong>in</strong> chapter 2, section<br />
4, dist<strong>in</strong>guishes six complementtypes: <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>complements</strong> (INDs),