Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
248 7. CONCLUSION<br />
The sense modality hierarchy does not only re ect the lexicalization<br />
sequence passive PVs follow, but also, which additional mean<strong>in</strong>gs along<br />
the sense modality hierarchy a passive PV can cover. For example <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Akatek</strong>, ab' `hear' is also used to cover the lower sense modalities of<br />
touch, taste, and smell, which have no dist<strong>in</strong>ct lexical realizations<br />
as is the case for example <strong>in</strong> English.<br />
The hierarchy also predicts that PVs higher up <strong>in</strong> the hierarchy are<br />
more likely to extend their mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the cognitive doma<strong>in</strong> than<br />
those on the lower end. In <strong>Akatek</strong> both il `see' and ab' `hear' extend<br />
their mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the cognitive doma<strong>in</strong>. Passive PVs that have acquired<br />
an additional cognitive mean<strong>in</strong>g are special matrix predicates.<br />
In <strong>language</strong>s with a complementation system, passive PVs can take<br />
at least two di erent complement types provided that the cognitive<br />
extension of passive PVs is universal (Hypothesis I).<br />
2. PVC types<br />
The di erentPVCtypes were described accord<strong>in</strong>g to their semantic<br />
and their structural characteristics and identi ed as one of six di erent<br />
complement types (Noonan, 1985): <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>complements</strong> (INDs),<br />
subjunctive <strong>complements</strong> (SUBs), paratactic <strong>complements</strong> (PARAs),<br />
<strong>in</strong> nitives (INFs), nom<strong>in</strong>alizations (NMLZs) and participles (PARTs).<br />
Ihave shown <strong>in</strong> chapter 3 that <strong>in</strong> English, there are more PVC types<br />
than the ones <strong>in</strong>vestigated. For example, I explicitly excluded whclauses,<br />
ad<strong>verb</strong>ial clauses and small clause constructions as well as participial<br />
adjunct clauses from the <strong>in</strong>vestigation. Exclud<strong>in</strong>g participial<br />
adjunct clauses from the <strong>in</strong>vestigation, i.e. Noonan's PART complement<br />
type, reduces the prospective typology of PVCs to ve complement<br />
types: IND, SUB, PARA, INF, and NMLZ.<br />
I described ve PVCtypes <strong>in</strong> English: NI-PVCs (INFs), <strong>in</strong>g-PVCs<br />
(INFs), PNOMs (NMLZs), to-PVCs (INFs) and that-PVCs (INDs).<br />
The non-PVC complement type INOM was added to the <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />
because on the one hand INOMs contrast well with PNOMs and on the<br />
other they share a number of structural and semantic characteristics<br />
with to-PVCs and that-PVCs. <strong>Akatek</strong> has two di erent types of PVC,<br />
referred to as type1 and type2. Type2 PVCs are NMLZs comparable to<br />
the NMLZ PNOMs <strong>in</strong> English. Type1 PVCs occur <strong>in</strong> two varieties, as<br />
INDs or as SUBs. They only di er <strong>in</strong> the complementizers they take.<br />
3. Interpretation of PVC types<br />
The goal of this study was to establish correlations between structural<br />
PVC types and two semantic types: events and propositions.