05.08.2013 Views

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. PVC TYPES 227<br />

subjunctive <strong>complements</strong> (SUBs), paratactic <strong>complements</strong> (PARAs) ,<br />

<strong>in</strong> nitives (INFs), nom<strong>in</strong>alizations (NMLZs) and participles (PARTs).<br />

INDs and SUBs are both sentence-like, SUBs di er from INDs <strong>in</strong><br />

mood. In PARAs, the notional subject of the complement is retrieved<br />

from the preced<strong>in</strong>g clause. PARAs can be used as <strong>in</strong>dependent sentences.<br />

As opposed to INDs and SUBs they cannot take complementizers.<br />

INFs are de ned as <strong>verb</strong>-likeentities that lack syntactic relations<br />

to their notional subject. NMLZs have the <strong>in</strong>ternal structure of noun<br />

phrases. NMLZs can occur with articles, case markers, and sometimes<br />

even a plural marker. PARTs have been excluded from the <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />

of PVCs <strong>in</strong> chapter 3. This chapter deals with Hypotheses I, V,<br />

and VI, which were developed <strong>in</strong> chapters 1 and 5:<br />

1. Hypothesis I<br />

Provided that at least one PV <strong>in</strong> a <strong>language</strong> has a cognitive<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g, all <strong>language</strong>s with a complementation system use at<br />

least two di erent types of PVC, one to express events and one<br />

to denote propositions.<br />

2. Hypothesis V<br />

PVC types higher up <strong>in</strong> the hierarchy, e.g. the IND types, are<br />

more likely to denote propositions, while PVC types lower <strong>in</strong><br />

the hierarchy, e.g. the NMLZ types, are more likely to denote<br />

events.<br />

3. Hypothesis VI<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g ve complement types of the typology of complementation,<br />

i.e. INDs, SUBs, PARAs, INFs, and NMLZs can<br />

function as PVCs, but PVC types are not restricted to these ve<br />

types.<br />

The cognitive extension of passive PVs is assumed to be a tentative<br />

universal, so that the focus of <strong>in</strong>vestigation for Hypothesis I lies on<br />

the existence of at least two di erent PVCtypes. The hierarchy of<br />

PVC types referred to <strong>in</strong> Hypothesis V is repeated here from chapter<br />

5 with the addition of the PARA type, which did not occur <strong>in</strong> English<br />

or <strong>Akatek</strong>:<br />

(3) IND > SUB > PARA > INF > NMLZ<br />

Hypothesis VI is based on evidence from English (chapter 3) and<br />

<strong>Akatek</strong> (chapter 5), and an example from Hausa presented <strong>in</strong> chapter<br />

2. Unfortunately, the available sources on Hausa did not provide<br />

me with su cient <strong>in</strong>formation on PVC types to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this<br />

chapter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!