Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1. PVC TYPES 227<br />
subjunctive <strong>complements</strong> (SUBs), paratactic <strong>complements</strong> (PARAs) ,<br />
<strong>in</strong> nitives (INFs), nom<strong>in</strong>alizations (NMLZs) and participles (PARTs).<br />
INDs and SUBs are both sentence-like, SUBs di er from INDs <strong>in</strong><br />
mood. In PARAs, the notional subject of the complement is retrieved<br />
from the preced<strong>in</strong>g clause. PARAs can be used as <strong>in</strong>dependent sentences.<br />
As opposed to INDs and SUBs they cannot take complementizers.<br />
INFs are de ned as <strong>verb</strong>-likeentities that lack syntactic relations<br />
to their notional subject. NMLZs have the <strong>in</strong>ternal structure of noun<br />
phrases. NMLZs can occur with articles, case markers, and sometimes<br />
even a plural marker. PARTs have been excluded from the <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />
of PVCs <strong>in</strong> chapter 3. This chapter deals with Hypotheses I, V,<br />
and VI, which were developed <strong>in</strong> chapters 1 and 5:<br />
1. Hypothesis I<br />
Provided that at least one PV <strong>in</strong> a <strong>language</strong> has a cognitive<br />
mean<strong>in</strong>g, all <strong>language</strong>s with a complementation system use at<br />
least two di erent types of PVC, one to express events and one<br />
to denote propositions.<br />
2. Hypothesis V<br />
PVC types higher up <strong>in</strong> the hierarchy, e.g. the IND types, are<br />
more likely to denote propositions, while PVC types lower <strong>in</strong><br />
the hierarchy, e.g. the NMLZ types, are more likely to denote<br />
events.<br />
3. Hypothesis VI<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g ve complement types of the typology of complementation,<br />
i.e. INDs, SUBs, PARAs, INFs, and NMLZs can<br />
function as PVCs, but PVC types are not restricted to these ve<br />
types.<br />
The cognitive extension of passive PVs is assumed to be a tentative<br />
universal, so that the focus of <strong>in</strong>vestigation for Hypothesis I lies on<br />
the existence of at least two di erent PVCtypes. The hierarchy of<br />
PVC types referred to <strong>in</strong> Hypothesis V is repeated here from chapter<br />
5 with the addition of the PARA type, which did not occur <strong>in</strong> English<br />
or <strong>Akatek</strong>:<br />
(3) IND > SUB > PARA > INF > NMLZ<br />
Hypothesis VI is based on evidence from English (chapter 3) and<br />
<strong>Akatek</strong> (chapter 5), and an example from Hausa presented <strong>in</strong> chapter<br />
2. Unfortunately, the available sources on Hausa did not provide<br />
me with su cient <strong>in</strong>formation on PVC types to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this<br />
chapter.